Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adapting and Implementing the I-HoME Intervention in Caregivers of Patients With ADRD (NCT NCT06488157)

NCT ID: NCT06488157

Last Updated: 2025-08-27

Results Overview

Feasibility was measured by the percentage of caregivers who enrolled in the study out of all eligible participants.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

15 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Recruitment (7 months)

Results posted on

2025-08-27

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention (I-HoME)
Participants receive video visits with a nurse practitioner for up to six visits every 2 weeks to address symptom management and care needs. I-HoME: Video visits with a nurse practitioner for up to six visits every 2 weeks to address symptom management and care needs
Overall Study
STARTED
15
Overall Study
COMPLETED
15
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Adapting and Implementing the I-HoME Intervention in Caregivers of Patients With ADRD

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention (I-HoME)
n=15 Participants
Participants receive video visits with a nurse practitioner for up to six visits every 2 weeks to address symptom management and care needs. I-HoME: Video visits with a nurse practitioner for up to six visits every 2 weeks to address symptom management and care needs
Age, Continuous
68.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.93 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
Highest Education Completed
Some high school
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Highest Education Completed
High School or GED
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Highest Education Completed
Some College
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Highest Education Completed
College degree
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
Highest Education Completed
Post-graduate but no degree
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Highest Education Completed
Graduate Degree
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
Annual Household Income Range
$25,000 or less
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Annual Household Income Range
$25,001 to $50,000
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
Annual Household Income Range
$50,001 to $75,000
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Annual Household Income Range
$75,001 or greater
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
Relationship to Patient
Spouse/partner
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
Relationship to Patient
Child
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
Relationship to Patient
Relative
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
Relationship to Patient
Friend
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Relationship to Patient
Paid Caregiver
0 Participants
n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Recruitment (7 months)

Population: All participants who we reached out to and were eligible for our study, including those who refused to participate or were unreachable over multiple attempts, were included in the number of participants analyzed for this measure.

Feasibility was measured by the percentage of caregivers who enrolled in the study out of all eligible participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Participants
n=41 Participants
This measure represents the recruitment rate for all participants.
Feasibility, as Measured by the Percentage of Caregivers Who Enroll in the Study
37 percentage of all eligible participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At the end of the intervention or at 12 weeks, whichever is earlier

Feasibility was measured by dividing the number of tele-visits conducted by the number of tele-visits that could have been conducted, then multiplying by 100. This measure shows the adherence of the intervention arm to the tele-visits. The percentage is calculated for the group rather than the individual patient.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Participants
n=90 Tele-visits
This measure represents the recruitment rate for all participants.
Feasibility, as Measured by the Percentage of Tele-visits Conducted
95.5 percentage of tele-visits conducted

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks

Population: This measure was not collected because, after completing the first phase of the study, we found it was not relevant to the participants in the clinical trial.

Change in behavioral and psychosocial symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in the patient, as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Scale is from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more severe BPSD.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 week

Population: The number of participants analyzed at each time point varied because: A caregiver was ineligible to participate due to their care recipient passing away. A caregiver missed the tele-visit session on that particular week.

Mean caregiver depression score, as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8. Scale is from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Participants
n=15 Participants
This measure represents the recruitment rate for all participants.
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Baseline
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Week 2
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Week 4
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Week 6
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Week 8
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.15
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Week 10
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.74
Mean Caregiver Depression Score, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Week 12
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants analyzed at each time point varied because: A caregiver was ineligible to participate due to their care recipient passing away. A caregiver missed the tele-visit session on that particular week.

Mean caregiver anxiety score, as measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7. Scale is from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Participants
n=15 Participants
This measure represents the recruitment rate for all participants.
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Baseline
5.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.25
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Week 2
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.17
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Week 4
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.77
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Week 6
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.96
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Week 8
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.94
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Week 10
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.49
Mean Caregiver Anxiety Score, as Measured by General Anxiety Disorder-7
Week 12
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.33

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants analyzed at each time point varied because: A caregiver was ineligible to participate due to their care recipient passing away. A caregiver missed the tele-visit session on that particular week.

Mean caregiver burden score, as measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - short version. Scale is from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating higher caregiver burden.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Participants
n=15 Participants
This measure represents the recruitment rate for all participants.
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Baseline
16.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.54
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Week 2
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.43
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Week 4
10.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.90
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Week 6
9.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.17
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Week 8
9.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.02
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Week 10
10.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.33
Mean Caregiver Burden Score, as Measured by the Zarit Burden Interview - Short Version
Week 12
10.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.00

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks

Population: The number of participants analyzed at each time point varied because: A caregiver was ineligible to participate due to their care recipient passing away. A caregiver missed the tele-visit session on that particular week.

Mean caregiver perception of patient's pain score, as measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale behavioral assessment. Scale is from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Participants
n=15 Participants
This measure represents the recruitment rate for all participants.
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Week 10
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.62
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Baseline
5.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.99
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Week 2
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Week 4
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Week 6
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.02
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Week 8
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
Mean Caregiver Perception of Patient's Pain Score, as Measured by the Doloplus 2 Scale Behavioral Assessment
Week 12
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.08

Adverse Events

Intervention (I-HoME)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Veerawat Phongtankuel

Weill Cornell Medicine

Phone: 212-746-7000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place