Electromiographic Evaluation and Skeletal Parameters of Patients Requiring Orthodontic Treatment
NCT06485375 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2024-07-03
Summary
The relationship between form and function within the craniofacial complex has been investigated by several Authors. However, there is still controversy regarding the different electromyographic activation patterns of the elevator muscles of the jaw. One particularly contentious area of enquiry is whether it is facial morphology that determines the strength of muscle activation, or whether a strong musculature can influence skeletal growth processes.
In light of the aforementioned considerations, the objective of the current clinical observational study was to investigate the potential correlation between the electromyographic activity of selected masticatory muscles (masseter, anterior temporalis and suprahyoid) and the craniofacial morphology of subjects under examination, with a particular focus on elucidating the mechanical advantage derived from different sagittal relationships between the maxillae. The electromyographic evaluation is carried out before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment (T0).
Conditions
- Skeletal Malocclusion
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
EMG
Disposable bipolar surface electrodes will be used. The patient's skin will be clean with cotton gauze soaked in alcohol before electrodes placement to reduce skin impedance. The operator will palpate the muscle belly while the patient clenches his teeth and will position surface electrodes in parallel to the muscular fibres. Doing so the position of the electrodes results as follows: Masseters electrodes will be fixed parallel to the exocanthion-gonion line and with the upper pole of the electrode under the tragus-labial commissural line. Temporalis electrodes will be positioned along the anterior margin of the muscle (corresponding to the frontoparietal suture). Suprahyoid muscles electrodes will be placed in the submental area nearly 1 cm posterior to the mental symphysis, paramedian to the midline and lightly diverging. A reference electrode will be applied to the forehead of the patient.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Pavia
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Andrea Scribante, DDS, PhD, MSc · University of Pavia
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 6 Years
- Max Age
- 25 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-03
- Primary Completion
- 2024-09-15
- Completion
- 2024-09-25
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency
NCT04863404 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Two Skeletally Anchored Force Mechanics for Skeletal Class II Correction in Growing Patients
NCT04884022 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Facilitated by Micro-osteoperforation in Adolescent Patients With Skeletal Maxillary Constriction
NCT03772379 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Transverse Maxillary Expansion With AMCOP Preformed Appliances
NCT06864949 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Interceptive Maxillary Expansion to Relief Anterior Crowding in the Mixed Dentition
NCT06187337 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary and Mandibular Arch Response to RME: a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02798822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Discomfort During Maxillary Expansion
NCT03757468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Smile Esthetics in Orthodontically Treated Patients With Bimaxillary-dentoalveolar Protrusion
NCT03074370 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation of Postural Exercises in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders
NCT06707467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Stability of Tooth-borne vs Bone-borne Maxillary Expansion: A Parallel Cohort Study
NCT06916299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Response After Maxillary Orthopedic Expansion in Class II Growing Subjects
NCT03159962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Extraction Vs Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment on Vertical Facial Dimension
NCT04151875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Neuromuscular Bite vs Physiotherapy in TMD Patients
NCT02946645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
NCT06573996 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Response of Individuals With Class II Malocclusion
NCT00248014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Treating Growing Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Maxillary Constriction
NCT06762418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Models Versus Plaster Ones.
NCT03714932 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT03976635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction Using 0.018-inch Versus 0.022-inch Slot Brackets in Adults
NCT04468295 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Measurements Made on Images Taken From the Mouth for Dental Arches
NCT03648515 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Speech-language Skills of Orthodontic Residents Through the Use of the "Interdisciplinary Orofacial Examination Protocol for Children and Adolescents"
NCT06887660 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Quantification of the Differences in the Diagnostic Relationships Between Centric Occlusion Versus Maximum Intercuspation in Adult Orthodontic Patients : A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06220955 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Efficiency for Three Different Aligning Archwires During Initial Orthodontic Leveling
NCT04387578 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA