Compare Wound Sampling Methods Efficacy in Microbiology Culture

NCT06460025 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 131

Last updated 2024-06-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Slough was a visible indicator of biofilm, which was the most available specimen from acute and chronic wounds. However, studies believed that slough were poorly accurate, and that the Levine swab was more recommended for sampling bacterial culture. This study aimed to compare slough with swab sample and analyze the consistency.

Conditions

  • Microbial Colonization
  • Infected Wound
  • Slough

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-10-01
Primary Completion
2023-10-01
Completion
2025-05-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06460025 on ClinicalTrials.gov