MedTrace Logo

Comparing Outcomes of Non-surgical Versus Surgical Treatment of Shoulder Fractures With Different Shoulder Replacements

NCT06444828 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2024-12-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The optimal treatment of complex shoulder fracture is controversial. In general, non-surgical treatment is recommended for older patients, but results are often unsatisfying. Therefore different surgical approaches have been tried to improve outcomes for this group of patients. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has shown promising results for these types of fractures and changes in the design of the implant might improve outcomes further. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of complex shoulder fractures after non-surgical versus surgical treatment and compare two different types of implants.

Conditions

  • Proximal Humeral Fracture
  • Humeral Head Fracture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Non-operative

Non-operative treatment versus operative treatment (surgery)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Region of Southern Denmark

    collaborator OTHER

  • University of Southern Denmark

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Klaus Hanisch · University of Southern Denmark

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
60 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-01
Primary Completion
2025-09-01
Completion
2026-09-01

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06444828 on ClinicalTrials.gov