Ultrasound Guided Versus Land-mark Method for Spinal Anesthesia in Super Obesity Parturients
NCT06410820 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2026-02-25
Summary
This study will investigate whether an ultrasound-assisted technique is better than a classical land-mark technique to facilitate spinal anesthesia in the sitting position in super obese pregnant women with BMI ≥ 50 who will undergo elective cesarean section.
The primary objective of this study is the rate of successful dural puncture at the first attempt. It was assumed that ultrasound could facilitate neuraxial blockade in super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2), pregnant women, according to the Who classification, whose topographic anatomy is difficult.
Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Procedure/Surgery: Ultrasound method group
In the operating room, all of the patients will receive standard monitoring. Scans will be made in logiditunal parasagittal and transverse midline views with ultrasound. Needle entry sites in the L2-L3 and L3-L4 intervals will be determined as the intersection of the longiditunal and transverse lines. When the spinal puncture operator is outside the room, Needle entry sites were marked for both groups.After skin marking, the pregnant woman will be asked to remain still and a subarachnoid puncture will be performed immediately. Spinal anesthesia will be administered with injection of intrathecal bupivacaine.
- DEVICE
-
Landmark method group
In the Landmark group, the injection site will be determined using the traditional method of palpating the posterior superior iliac spine.When the spinal puncture operator is outside the room, Needle entry sites were marked for both groups.After skin marking, the pregnant woman will be asked to remain still and a subarachnoid puncture will be performed immediately. Spinal anesthesia will be administered with injection of intrathecal bupivacaine.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Karaman Training and Research Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ayşegül Bilge, MD · Karaman TRH
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-05-16
- Primary Completion
- 2025-11-28
- Completion
- 2025-11-28
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasonography Versus Palpation for Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT03792191 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Non Obese Obstetric Patients
NCT01440400 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Ultrasound in Obstetric Anesthesia Central Blocks
NCT06761222 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Gestational Weight Gain on Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery
NCT07326644 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Surgery
NCT04612998 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Utility of Ultrasound in Identification of Midline and Placement of Epidural in Severely Obese Parturients
NCT03100968 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Anesthesia Techniques in Elective Cesarean Deliveries
NCT07295080 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Recovery Quality After Cesarean Section: Comparing Erector Spinae and Retrolaminar Blocks Using Turkish Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score in a Turkish Cohort (ObsQoR-11T)
NCT07181902 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Ultrasound Versus Palpation for Spinal Anesthesia Success
NCT03679663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesia Methods in Elective Cesarean Section Surgeries
NCT06425718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Risk Assessment of Obese Parturient Underwent Cesarean Section(CS) Delivery Under Different Anesthesia Ways
NCT03002636 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Atelectasis by Lung Ultrasonography in Cesarean Sections
NCT04591327 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Different Altitude Levels on Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section Surgery
NCT05715476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Best Incision in Cesarean Section of Obese Women
NCT06032637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Delivery
NCT06010602 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Relationship Between Analgesia Techniques and Post-cesarean Recovery Quality
NCT05181358 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does Ultrasound of the Spine Improve Labor Epidurals/Spinal Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients?
NCT01243216 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Injection Rate of Local Anesthetic in Caesarean Section
NCT05091294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambulation With Labor Epidural in Obese Women
NCT04504682 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guidance for Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia
NCT02436109 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
General or Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
NCT05727449 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Cesarean Section
NCT05117307 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision for Cesarean Section in Morbidly Obese Women
NCT02692729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Evaluation of Two Anatomic Landmarks in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: the Posterior Superior Iliac Spine VS Iliac Crest
NCT06711601 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Aneasthesia Used for Cesarean Section
NCT02987192 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA