Jet Injectors Versus Conventional Anesthetic Technique in Children
NCT06314984 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 76
Last updated 2024-03-18
Summary
This clinical study was conducted to compare the needleless Comfort-in jet injector device and the conventional needle technique in terms of
1. Pain level during the administration of local anesthesia in children.
2. Their effectiveness during pulpotomy procedures in primary molars.
Whether comfort-in jet injector device will achieve sufficient anesthesia for the procedures undertaken during pulpotomy or not when compared to the conventional technique and the pain levels of both techniques during the anesthesia step.
Conditions
- Anesthesia
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Group I A (Conventional needle syringe)
The injection site was isolated using cotton roll and the topical anesthesia (Benzocaine 4%) was applied to the injection site and left for 3-5 minutes then the injection was done in the mandible by the conventional needle syringe \[Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block\].
- OTHER
-
Group I B (Conventional needle syringe)
The injection site was isolated using cotton roll and the topical anesthesia (Benzocaine 4%) was applied to the injection site and left for 3-5 minutes then the injection was done in the maxilla by the conventional needle syringe \[Infiltration\].
- DEVICE
-
Group II A (Comfort-in Jet Injector)
The injection site was isolated using a cotton roll and the topical anesthesia (Benzocaine 4%) was applied to the injection site and left for 3-5 minutes then the injection was done in the mandible by the needleless Comfort-in jet injector \[Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block\].
- DEVICE
-
Group II B (Comfort-in Jet Injector)
The injection site was isolated using cotton roll and the topical anesthesia (Benzocaine 4%) was applied to the injection site and left for 3-5 minutes then the injection was done in the maxilla by the needleless Comfort-in jet injector \[Infiltration\].
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 4 Years
- Max Age
- 7 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-07-21
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-15
- Completion
- 2023-03-21
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Electronic vs. Conventional Syringes: Impact on Pediatric Pain and Anxiety
NCT07045116 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Efficacy of Various Pain Alleviating Methods in Reducing Pain in Children During Intraoral Local Anaesthetic Injections
NCT05564442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Perception of Dental Local Anesthesia Using "DentalVibe Comfort System" in a Group of Egyptian Children
NCT03033628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of the Comfort-In Needle Free Injection System During Palatal Infiltrative Anesthesia
NCT06606587 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Local Anesthesia With Computerized Device for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients
NCT05531435 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Local Anesthesia Techniques on Children's Dental Treatment Experience
NCT07106138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Using Camouflaged Dental Syringe
NCT06116994 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Pain Score of Needleless Jet Injector and Conventional Needle Injection for Teeth Extraction Anesthesia (Split Mouth Technique).
NCT06934512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Intraosseous Anesthesia Osteocentral With Electronic Assistance to Injection With Conventional Anesthesia
NCT04629924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Perception With a Comfort-ın Jet Injection and Conventional Dental Injection
NCT04682080 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Controlled Local Anesthesia in Children
NCT02025140 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparative Evaluation Between the Effectiveness of Vibration Assisted Syringe and Conventional Syringe
NCT04215055 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Intraligament vs IANB Anesthesia in Children Using Electronic Syringe
NCT07095946 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Pre-Warming of Local Anesthesia in Reducing Pain Perception During Injection in Children
NCT06519838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Perception of Needle-free System
NCT04653974 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of Intraosseous Anesthesia Performed With the SleeperOne5 Computer-Controlled Device and Conventional Mandibular Nerve Block on Behavior and Pain Control During Anesthesia Administration in Children Aged 5-9
NCT07198997 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs. Conventional Anesthesia for Primary Tooth Extractions in Pediatric Patients
NCT07087028 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Approaches of Delivering Local Dental Anesthesia on Pain Perception in Children.
NCT05338983 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Needle-free Injection System During Palatal Anesthesia
NCT05166291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Local Anesthesia With Needle-free Injection System
NCT04028271 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Vibrasthetic Device on Pain Reduction During Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients
NCT07306650 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Reduction Using Vibration and Topical Anesthesia
NCT06804616 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Applying a Small Procedure Prior to Injection/Vaccination Reduces Pain Experiences in Child Patients
NCT06313788 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of External Cold and Vibration (Buzzy Device) Versus the Conventional Technique on Pain Perception During Local Anesthesia Injection in Children.
NCT05067218 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Different Methods for Reducing Buccal Infiltration Local Anesthesia Injection Pain
NCT06290531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA