Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
NCT06305975 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2024-05-09
Summary
This study aims to investigate the effect of two peritoneal entry techniques on intraoperative and post-operative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon. Patients will be randomized to either blunt fascial or veress needle peritoneal entry. Insufflation times, failed entries, complications and post-operative pain scores will be collected.
The investigators hypothesize that the blunt entry technique will be associated with shorter insufflation times and similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with the veress needle entry technique.
Primary Objective: To evaluate the insufflation times and success upon peritoneal entry according to peritoneal entry technique.
Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the surgical outcomes and patients pain scores according to peritoneal entry technique.
Conditions
- Laparoscopic Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Blunt fascial abdominal entry
Blunt fascial entry technique description: a 5 mm incision is made in the umbilicus. Next, a curved Kelly forceps is used to open the fascia, and, if possible, the peritoneum. The Kelly forceps are then used to expand the opening to a 10 mm diameter. A 5 mm trocar is placed into the fascial hole and used to quickly insufflate the abdomen to 15 mm Hg. Once the abdomen is fully insufflated, a 10 mm trocar is placed using optical guidance.
- PROCEDURE
-
Veress needle abdominal entry
Veress needle abdominal entry technique description: a 5 mm incision is made in the umbilicus. Next, a Veress needle is used to enter the peritoneal cavity and inflate the abdomen to 15 mm Hg. Once the abdomen is fully insufflated, a 10 mm trocar is placed using optical guidance.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Raanan Meyer, MD · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-03-22
- Primary Completion
- 2025-03-01
- Completion
- 2025-03-01
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Retrospective Study With Prospective Follow-Up of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Utilizing the Bard Sepramesh IP Composite
NCT01305473 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Prospective Trial on the Occurrence of Laparoscopic Trocar Site Hernias
NCT01240434 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Versius or Laparoscopic TransAbdominal Inguinal Hernia REpair
NCT05262374 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh
NCT01355939 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03342040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): Laparoscopic Assisted Transvaginal Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01398215 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)
NCT01080599 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Ventral Hernia Repair: a Single Institution Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03133715 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Prospective Multicenter Study Primary Onlay- Mesh After Elective Median Laparotomy in Patients With BMI ≥ 27
NCT01507870 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT05472987 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Closed Suction Drain vs no Drain on Symptomatic Seroma Formation After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03563092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open Versus Robotic-assisted Ventral Hernia Repair, Short and Long-term Outcome
NCT05906017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preemer Trial - Prophylactic Mesh Versus no Mesh in the Midline Emergency Laparotomy Closure for Prevention of Incisional Hernia: a Multi Center, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04311788 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair with Routine Defect Closure Using Su2ura® Approximation Device
NCT04986917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Mesh Repair of Ventral Hernia: Comparison to Conventional Mesh Repair
NCT00532870 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Trial of a Bio-absorbable Mesh in Challenging Laparoscopic Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02712398 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Hybrid and Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02542085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT03490266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Versius or Laparoscopic Abdominal Hernia REpair
NCT05253586 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
The Mesh-RTL Project, for Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT04134455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02396940 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA