Trial Outcomes & Findings for Expediting Access to Services for Equity (NCT NCT06291246)

Of the 33 participants (16 Family Units \[FU\]) who met initial eligibility and signed informed consent, 31 participants (15 FUs) completed Baseline and remained eligible for randomization. Of those eligible, 6 participants (3 FUs) did not continue following randomization and did not receive any exposure to a study intervention. Data are reported below for the 25 participants (12 FUs) exposed to a study intervention.

Data are reported separately for Caregivers and Children.

The date of initiation (date 2) of autism-specific intervention will be the date that families report the first session with a therapist following the diagnosis (date 1). Time will be calculated as the number of days elapsed between these two dates (date 2 - date 1).

Scores on the General Well-Being Schedule will be used to measure caregiver well-being. Total scores range from 0-110. Higher scores are indicative of more positive well-being. There are 3 proposed scoring cut-points: 0-60 reflects "severe distress", 61-72 reflects "moderate distress", and 73-110 reflects "positive well-being).

The Early Learning Composite from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) will be used to measure developmental functioning. The Early Learning Composite (ELC) is a standardized composite score derived from the 5 subtests measured on the MSEL. It has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate stronger performance.

The Adaptive Behavior Assessment Scale, Third Edition (ABAS-3) will be used to measure adaptive functioning. The ABAS-3 assesses 3 domains of adaptive behavior, including Conceptual, Social, and Practical. The General Adaptive Composite (GAC) is a composite score derived from the 4 domains. It has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate stronger adaptive behavior skills.

The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a 4 question survey that assesses a participant's experience with or thoughts about the intervention's appropriateness. A scaled score can be created by averaging the item-level responses. Scaled score values range from 1 to 5. Cut-off scores or norms for interpretation are not yet available; however, higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a 4 question survey that assesses a participant's experience with or thoughts about the intervention's feasibility. A scaled score can be created by averaging the item-level responses. Scaled score values range from 1 to 5. Cut-off scores or norms for interpretation are not yet available; however, higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a 4 question survey that assesses a participant's experience with or thoughts about the intervention's acceptability. A scaled score can be created by averaging the item-level responses. Scaled score values range from 1 to 5. Cut-off scores or norms for interpretation are not yet available; however, higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.