Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluating the Impact of Synthetic Cooling Agents in Combustible Cigarettes on Smoking Perceptions and Use (NCT NCT06230159)
NCT ID: NCT06230159
Last Updated: 2026-06-03
Results Overview
Before participant recruitment began, chemical content analysis of 3 cigarettes of each study condition was performed. We used liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) to extract nicotine, WS-3, WS-23, and menthol from cigarette samples and quantified these analytes using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
Approximately 3 months prior to start of participant recruitment
2026-06-03
Participant Flow
2 participants were enrolled in the study but withdrew prior to randomization.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Synthetic Cooling - Non-Menthol - Menthol
Participants smoke a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 1, a non-menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Synthetic Cooling - Menthol - Non-Menthol
Participants smoke a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 1, a menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a non-menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Non-Menthol - Synthetic Cooling - Menthol
Participants smoke a non-menthol cigarette on visit 1, a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 2, and a menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Non-Menthol - Menthol - Synthetic Cooling
Participants smoke a non-menthol cigarette on visit 1, a menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 3
|
Menthol - Synthetic Cooling - Non-Menthol
Participants smoke a menthol cigarette on visit 1, a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 2, and a non-menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Menthol - Non-Menthol - Synthetic Cooling
Participants smoke a menthol cigarette on visit 1, a non-menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Visit 1
STARTED
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
|
Visit 1
COMPLETED
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
|
Visit 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Visit 2
STARTED
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
|
Visit 2
COMPLETED
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
|
Visit 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Visit 3
STARTED
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
|
Visit 3
COMPLETED
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
|
Visit 3
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Synthetic Cooling - Non-Menthol - Menthol
Participants smoke a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 1, a non-menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Synthetic Cooling - Menthol - Non-Menthol
Participants smoke a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 1, a menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a non-menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Non-Menthol - Synthetic Cooling - Menthol
Participants smoke a non-menthol cigarette on visit 1, a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 2, and a menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Non-Menthol - Menthol - Synthetic Cooling
Participants smoke a non-menthol cigarette on visit 1, a menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 3
|
Menthol - Synthetic Cooling - Non-Menthol
Participants smoke a menthol cigarette on visit 1, a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 2, and a non-menthol cigarette on visit 3
|
Menthol - Non-Menthol - Synthetic Cooling
Participants smoke a menthol cigarette on visit 1, a non-menthol cigarette on visit 2, and a cigarette with synthetic cooling agents on visit 3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Visit 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluating the Impact of Synthetic Cooling Agents in Combustible Cigarettes on Smoking Perceptions and Use
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Population
n=32 Participants
Full population of participants assessed at baseline.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
25.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
22 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Cigarettes Smoked per Day
|
18.3 cigarettes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.5 • n=20 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Approximately 3 months prior to start of participant recruitmentPopulation: Only the study products were analysed for this aim, no participant data was included
Before participant recruitment began, chemical content analysis of 3 cigarettes of each study condition was performed. We used liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) to extract nicotine, WS-3, WS-23, and menthol from cigarette samples and quantified these analytes using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=3 Cigarette rod
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=3 Cigarette rod
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=3 Cigarette rod
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cigarette Chemical Contents
Nicotine
|
22.86 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
22.30 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
21.42 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Cigarette Chemical Contents
WS-3
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
3.17 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Cigarette Chemical Contents
WS-23
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Cigarette Chemical Contents
Menthol
|
1.64 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 mg/g of tobacco rod
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After completion of study cigarette smoking session (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit. 1 Participant excluded for their synthetic cooling agent study visit as their forced choice task was not recorded.
At each study visit, after the participant has smoked the study cigarette, the participant must choose between smoking the study cigarette again, or smoking one of their own, usual brand cigarettes. Within each arm, the proportion of participants who opt to continue smoking the study cigarette will be reported. This will measure if demand for the study cigarettes is great enough to overcome the desire for the participant's own preferred cigarettes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=29 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Impact of Cooling Effects on Demand Via the Forced Choice Task
|
9 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During study cigarette smoking session (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit. 1 Participant was excluded for their cigarette with synthetic cooling agents visit as topography measures were not recorded. 1 Participant was excluded for their menthol cigarette visit as accurate topography measures were not recorded.
Will be measured with a topography device that records frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs. These measures are combined to inform overall cigarette puff behavior. Greater frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs suggest greater abuse liability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=29 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=29 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abuse Liability Via Puff Topography - Total Smoking Time
|
255.00 seconds
Standard Deviation 78.59
|
280.41 seconds
Standard Deviation 85.08
|
236.49 seconds
Standard Deviation 83.85
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During study cigarette smoking session (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit. 1 Participant was excluded for their cigarette with synthetic cooling agents visit as topography measures were not recorded. 1 Participant was excluded for their menthol cigarette visit as accurate topography measures were not recorded.
Will be measured with a topography device that records frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs. These measures are combined to inform overall cigarette puff behavior. Greater frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs suggest greater abuse liability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=29 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=29 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abuse Liability Via Puff Topography - Average Puff Duration
|
1.60 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
1.62 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
1.68 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During study cigarette smoking session (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit. 1 Participant was excluded for their cigarette with synthetic cooling agents visit as topography measures were not recorded. 1 Participant was excluded for their menthol cigarette visit as accurate topography measures were not recorded.
Will be measured with a topography device that records frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs. These measures are combined to inform overall cigarette puff behavior. Greater frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs suggest greater abuse liability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=29 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=29 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abuse Liability Via Puff Topography - Average Flow Rate
|
25.18 mL/s
Standard Deviation 7.72
|
25.92 mL/s
Standard Deviation 7.38
|
25.13 mL/s
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During study cigarette smoking session (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit. 1 Participant was excluded for their cigarette with synthetic cooling agents visit as topography measures were not recorded. 1 Participant was excluded for their menthol cigarette visit as accurate topography measures were not recorded.
Will be measured with a topography device that records frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs. These measures are combined to inform overall cigarette puff behavior. Greater frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs suggest greater abuse liability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=29 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=29 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abuse Liability Via Puff Topography - Average Inter-Puff Interval
|
20.05 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
21.94 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
20.34 seconds
Standard Deviation 9.32
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During study cigarette smoking session (Week 1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit. 1 Participant was excluded for their cigarette with synthetic cooling agents visit as topography measures were not recorded. 1 Participant was excluded for their menthol cigarette visit as accurate topography measures were not recorded.
Will be measured with a topography device that records frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs. These measures are combined to inform overall cigarette puff behavior. Greater frequency, duration, and flow rate of cigarette puffs suggest greater abuse liability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=29 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=29 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abuse Liability Via Puff Topography - Average Puff Volume
|
38.17 mL
Standard Deviation 16.12
|
39.60 mL
Standard Deviation 15.86
|
39.97 mL
Standard Deviation 16.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post study cigarette smoking session (Week1, Week 2, Week 3)Population: 1 Participant excluded for non-compliance during their study visits (all 3 study products). 1 Participant excluded as records were unclear as to what product was used during their single study visit.
Participants will complete the Appeal and Sensory Quality questionnaire after smoking each study cigarette. This questionnaire will ask participants to rate each study cigarette for appeal characteristics such as liking, willingness to use again, flavor intensity, pleasantness of taste, etc. on a scale of 0 (not at all)-100(extremely). Higher scores indicate greater liking, willingness to use again, flavor intensity, etc.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Menthol cigarette
|
Non-menthol Cigarette
n=30 Participants
Non-menthol cigarette
|
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
n=30 Participants
Cigarette with synthetic cooling agents
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Dislike
|
33.97 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.53
|
35.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.66
|
39.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.45
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Use Again
|
60.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.36
|
49.23 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.89
|
47.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.52
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Sweet
|
42.93 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.80
|
24.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.04
|
33.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.61
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Smooth
|
68.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.21
|
44.23 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.99
|
56.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.11
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Bitter
|
22.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.39
|
42.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.82
|
33.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.40
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Cool
|
64.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.23
|
14.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.00
|
48.90 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.27
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Strong
|
57.63 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.81
|
63.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.39
|
54.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.72
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Like
|
58.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.00
|
53.57 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.39
|
52.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.95
|
|
Cigarette Appeal
Harsh
|
28.43 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.43
|
50.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.75
|
36.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.94
|
Adverse Events
Menthol Cigarette
Cigarette With Synthetic Cooling Agents
Non-menthol Cigarette
Usual Brand Cigarette
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Alayna Tackett
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place