Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 2) (NCT NCT06220604)
NCT ID: NCT06220604
Last Updated: 2026-07-07
Results Overview
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0 =no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,= 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,= 0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,= 0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
731 participants
Week 16
2026-07-07
Participant Flow
The trial enrolled 731 participants, of which 723 participants were evaluable for efficacy.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
STARTED
|
82
|
322
|
327
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
COMPLETED
|
74
|
307
|
309
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
15
|
18
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
STARTED
|
74
|
307
|
309
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
COMPLETED
|
74
|
299
|
303
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
8
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Death
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Other
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Adverse Event
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16)
Non-Compliance With Study Drug
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16 - 24)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 2)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=82 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
JNJ-77242113
n=322 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=327 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Total
n=731 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=20 Participants
|
45.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.78 • n=20 Participants
|
45.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.22 • n=40 Participants
|
46.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.56 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
235 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
55 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
218 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
223 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
496 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
102 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
70 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
279 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
279 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
628 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
15 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
65 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
274 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
265 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
604 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
14 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
24 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
193 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0 =no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,= 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,= 0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,= 0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
|
8.6 Percentage of participants
|
70.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (\>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
|
1.2 Percentage of participants
|
57.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, \>1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
|
1.2 Percentage of participants
|
36.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (\>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 4 and 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16
Week 4
|
3.7 Percentage of participants
|
16.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16
Week 16
|
9.9 Percentage of participants
|
77.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (\>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 8 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 8
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
25.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=81 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
|
1.2 Percentage of participants
|
31.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had baseline ss-IGA score \>=2. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=268 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2
|
18.6 Percentage of participants
|
74.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 8 and 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline PSSD symptom score \>0. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Week 8
|
1.4 Percentage of participants
|
9.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Week 16
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
21.6 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the stud and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline in PSSD itch score \>=4. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=60 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=256 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Week 16
|
15.0 Percentage of participants
|
60.2 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Week 4
|
5.0 Percentage of participants
|
21.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 16 and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,\>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score=more severe disease.Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
70.9 Percentage of participants
|
55.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
68.8 Percentage of participants
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 16 and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, \>1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
36.9 Percentage of participants
|
17.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
21.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 16 and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (\>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
77.8 Percentage of participants
|
61.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
82.8 Percentage of participants
|
67.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 16 and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (\>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
57.5 Percentage of participants
|
34.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
65.0 Percentage of participants
|
43.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 16 and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Weeks 16 and 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 16
|
31.9 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Week 24
|
33.4 Percentage of participants
|
16.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline PSSD symptom score \>0. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=282 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
|
21.6 Percentage of participants
|
12.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data.
A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=77 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=309 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=311 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
|
-5.76 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 12.643
|
-20.44 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 13.892
|
-17.87 Percentage of BSA
Standard Deviation 14.627
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data.
Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=77 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=309 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=311 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
|
-5.54 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.640
|
-16.93 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.479
|
-14.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.872
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data.
Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=77 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=309 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=311 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
|
-27.21 Percent change
Standard Deviation 37.785
|
-85.01 Percent change
Standard Deviation 22.500
|
-74.58 Percent change
Standard Deviation 27.102
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline sPGA-G score \>=2. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=106 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2
|
28.6 Percentage of participants
|
77.4 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline hf-PGA score \>=2. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a \>=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=34 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=144 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
|
72.2 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: Analysis population=all participants who randomized at Week 0 in study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had baseline mNAPSI score \>0. 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed)=number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1=onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2=pitting, and 3=nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present), and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=39 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=135 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
|
12.2 Percent change
Standard Deviation 116.72
|
-40.6 Percent change
Standard Deviation 58.00
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline f-PGA score \>=2. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=104 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
|
13.6 Percentage of participants
|
51.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=263 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
|
-6.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.60
|
-35.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.89
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=263 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
|
-6.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.02
|
-40.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.70
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline sign score \>0. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=70 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=297 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >0
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
15.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline GenPS-SFQ item 2 score \>=2 and a baseline sPGA-G score \>=3. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=37 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
|
70.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=80 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=317 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
|
13.8 Percentage of participants
|
53.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arm only.
The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=77 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16
|
-3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.15
|
-9.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.74
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with non-missing data for this outcome measure after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. Participants with missing assessments were not included, as no further imputation was applied for missing data. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured that is higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=77 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=309 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Anxiety
|
-4.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.71
|
-4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.21
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Depression
|
-3.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
-3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.59
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Fatigue
|
-4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
-4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.85
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Physical function
|
3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.95
|
2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Sleep disturbance
|
-2.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.88
|
-3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.46
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Social roles and activity
|
3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.21
|
5.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.60
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Pain interference
|
-3.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.38
|
-7.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.38
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 16 and 24Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline DLQI score \>1. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
The DLQI was a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=317 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=318 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
Week 16
|
53.0 Percentage of participants
|
39.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 16 and 24 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
Week 24
|
59.0 Percentage of participants
|
45.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Analysis population only included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 in the study and were evaluable for efficacy analysis, and had a baseline PSSD symptom score \>0. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data after applying predefined intercurrent event rules. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (\>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Placebo Followed by JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16, and then crossed-over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 milligrams (mg) tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 2: JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=282 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
Arm 3: Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score of 0 at Week 24 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
|
21.6 Percentage of participants
|
13.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 24 up to Week 160Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 24 up to Week 160Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 24 up to Week 160Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 160Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 160Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): Placebo
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): Placebo to JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): JNJ-77242113 200 mg
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): Deucravacitinib 6 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): Placebo
n=82 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16 during placebo-controlled period. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 16.
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 16 during placebo-controlled period.
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=327 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 16 during placebo-controlled period.
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): Placebo to JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=74 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during placebo-controlled period crossed over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet orally QD from Week 16 up to Week 24 in active-controlled period. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24.
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=307 participants at risk
Participants who received JNJ-77242113 and placebo matching to deucravacitinib during placebo-controlled period continued to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24 during active-controlled period.
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=309 participants at risk
Participants who received deucravacitinib and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 during placebo-controlled period continued to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24 during active-controlled period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina Pectoris
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.32%
1/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.33%
1/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary Artery Disease
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal Fistula
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal Obstruction
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.32%
1/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infective Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.65%
2/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.33%
1/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head Injury
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus Injury
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.33%
1/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal Burn
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.33%
1/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.32%
1/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign Neoplasm of Bladder
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast Cancer
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Keratoacanthoma
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant Melanoma in Situ
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.32%
1/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular Accident
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.32%
1/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep Apnoea Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.31%
1/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): Placebo
n=82 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally once daily (QD) from Week 0 to Week 16 during placebo-controlled period. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 16.
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=322 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 0 to Week 16 during placebo-controlled period.
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-16): Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=327 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 0 to Week 16 during placebo-controlled period.
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): Placebo to JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=74 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during placebo-controlled period crossed over to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet orally QD from Week 16 up to Week 24 in active-controlled period. Participants also received placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24.
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): JNJ-77242113 200 mg
n=307 participants at risk
Participants who received JNJ-77242113 and placebo matching to deucravacitinib during placebo-controlled period continued to receive JNJ-77242113 200 mg tablet and a placebo matching to deucravacitinib capsule orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24 during active-controlled period.
|
Active Controlled Period (Week 16-24): Deucravacitinib 6 mg
n=309 participants at risk
Participants who received deucravacitinib and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 during placebo-controlled period continued to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg capsule and a placebo matching to JNJ-77242113 tablet orally QD from Week 16 to Week 24 during active-controlled period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.3%
6/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
5.9%
19/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
10.1%
33/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
8.1%
6/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
4.9%
15/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
5.8%
18/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
3.7%
3/82 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
2.5%
8/322 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
6.1%
20/327 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
2.7%
2/74 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
2.6%
8/307 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
5.8%
18/309 • Placebo-controlled period: Week 0 up to Week 16; Active-controlled period: Week 16 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.
|
Additional Information
Global Medical Head Dermatology
Janssen Research and Development, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days to allow for filing of a patent application.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER