Trial Outcomes & Findings for Home Safety Intervention (NCT NCT06216327)

NCT ID: NCT06216327

Last Updated: 2026-08-28

Results Overview

Ability to recruit 40 Veterans in one year. Count represents number of participants recruited within one year.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

40 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

through study completion, an average of one year

Results posted on

2026-08-28

Participant Flow

The study used adaptive pilot testing in three phases. Phase 1 (Oct 2024-Mar 2025) recruited Veterans from the Rocky Mountain Regional VA. Phase 2 (Mar-Apr 2025) expanded to VHA VISN 19. No unique challenges were found, however interviews with participants suggested the intervention was too long. In Phase 3 (Apr-Jun 2025), focus shifted to firearm storage, reducing intervention time and increasing acceptability.

40 veterans consented to participate in the study. 3 discontinued enrollment prior to their baseline visit (2 unable to contact after consent, 1 due to time).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention Arm
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Baseline Visit (Time Point 0)
STARTED
40
Baseline Visit (Time Point 0)
COMPLETED
37
Baseline Visit (Time Point 0)
NOT COMPLETED
3
30 Day Follow up (4 Weeks)
STARTED
37
30 Day Follow up (4 Weeks)
COMPLETED
36
30 Day Follow up (4 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Intervention Arm
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Baseline Visit (Time Point 0)
Lost to Follow-up
2
Baseline Visit (Time Point 0)
Withdrawal by Subject
1
30 Day Follow up (4 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
1

Baseline Characteristics

Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=37 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
n=31 Participants • Ethnicity was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Age, Continuous
55 Years
n=31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=31 Participants • Birthsex was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants
n=31 Participants • Birthsex was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
n=31 Participants • Race was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants
n=31 Participants • Ethnicity was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • Ethnicity was collected for all 37 participants who attended their baseline (0 day) visit.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: through study completion, an average of one year

Ability to recruit 40 Veterans in one year. Count represents number of participants recruited within one year.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=40 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Feasibility: Number of Participants Recruited Within One Year
40 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: approximately 4 weeks

\>80% of participants attend their 4 week follow up. Count represents number of participants who completed their 4 week follow up visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=40 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Feasibility: Number of Participants Who Attend Their 4 Week Follow Up
36 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks

Population: At day of intervention delivery - day 0, 35 participants who attended the baseline visit had available data for this measure. At 4 weeks, 34 participants who attended their 4 week visit had available data.

\>80% with score greater than 23 (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8). 8 items, each with 4 answer options (1-4) on a Likert Scale. Likert options are different for each item. Score range is 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=35 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Acceptability: Number of Participants With CSQ Scores ≥24
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
31 Participants
Acceptability: Number of Participants With CSQ Scores ≥24
4 weeks
28 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended their 4 week visit were analyzed.

Count of participants who deemed the intervention acceptable via a qualitative evaluation of participant's experiences during the intervention. Assessed using the Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (NEII): A 16-item semi-structured qualitative interview that helps participants evaluate the process and outcome of interventions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Acceptability: Number of Participants Who Reported the Intervention to be Acceptable
36 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

Count represent the number of participants who reported feeling "Comfortable" or "Very comfortable". "How comfortable did you feel engaging in the discussion?" Likert responses: * Very uncomfortable * Uncomfortable * Neither * Comfortable * Very comfortable

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention Discussion to be Comfortable/Very Comfortable
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
31 Participants
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention Discussion to be Comfortable/Very Comfortable
4 weeks
35 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks

Population: 30 participants reported having medications and thus were included in analysis.

Count represent the number of participants who reported that their interaction was "Very helpful" or "Extremely helpful". "How helpful was your interaction in making decisions about medication storage and safety?" Likert responses: * Not at all * Slightly helpful * Moderately helpful * Very helpful * Extremely helpful

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=30 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Very Helpful/Extremely Helpful in Medication Storage Decisions
4 weeks
18 Participants
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Very Helpful/Extremely Helpful in Medication Storage Decisions
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
18 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks

Population: 19 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week visits and reported having a firearm in the home were included in analysis.

Count represent the number of participants who reported that their interaction was "Very helpful" or "Extremely helpful". "How helpful was your interaction in making decisions about firearm storage?" Likert responses: * Not at all * Slightly helpful * Moderately helpful * Very helpful * Extremely helpful

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=19 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Very Helpful/Extremely Helpful in Firearm Storage Decisions
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
10 Participants
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Very Helpful/Extremely Helpful in Firearm Storage Decisions
4 weeks
14 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks

Population: 19 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week visits and reported having a firearm in the home were included in analysis.

Count represents the number of participants who reported that their interaction was "Respectful" or "Very respectful". "To what extent was this intervention respectful of your values as a firearm owner? Likert responses: * Very disrespectful * Disrespectful * Neither * Respectful * Very respectful

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=19 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Respectful/Very Respectful of Their Values as Firearm Owners
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
19 Participants
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Respectful/Very Respectful of Their Values as Firearm Owners
4 weeks
17 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

"On a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 indicates complete trust and 0 indicates complete distrust (so 5 would indicate that you neither trust, nor distrust), Please indicate your level of trust in the VA healthcare system?" Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Trust in the VA Healthcare System
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
Average Participant Trust in the VA Healthcare System
4 weeks
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

"On a scale of 0 to 10, I want to ask you about whether you find the following safety measures to be important. Someone who answers 0 does not consider them to be important at all, while someone who answers 10 considers them to be extremely important. It is important to securely store medications when I or someone in my household has had recent thoughts of suicide." Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Medication Storage When Someone is Suicidal
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
7.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Medication Storage When Someone is Suicidal
4 weeks
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

"On a scale of 0 to 10, I want to ask you about whether you find the following safety measures to be important. Someone who answers 0 does not consider them to be important at all, while someone who answers 10 considers them to be extremely important. It is always important to securely store medications even if someone is not at risk for suicide in the home." Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Medication Storage Always
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
5.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Medication Storage Always
4 weeks
6.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

"On a scale of 0 to 10, I want to ask you about whether you find the following safety measures to be important. Someone who answers 0 does not consider them to be important at all, while someone who answers 10 considers them to be extremely important. It is important to securely store firearms when I or someone in my household has had recent thoughts of suicide." Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Firearm Storage When Someone is Suicidal
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
9.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Firearm Storage When Someone is Suicidal
4 weeks
9.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

"On a scale of 0 to 10, I want to ask you about whether you find the following safety measures to be important. Someone who answers 0 does not consider them to be important at all, while someone who answers 10 considers them to be extremely important. It is always important to store firearms securely in a locked space, or with a locking device, even if someone is not at risk for suicide in the home." Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Firearm Storage Always
4 weeks
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Firearm Storage Always
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

"On a scale of 0 to 10, I want to ask you about whether you find the following safety measures to be important. Someone who answers 0 does not consider them to be important at all, while someone who answers 10 considers them to be extremely important. It is always important to securely store firearms unloaded even if someone is not at risk for suicide in the home." Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Unloaded Firearm Storage Always
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
7.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.7
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Unloaded Firearm Storage Always
4 weeks
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery - day 0

Population: 20 participants reported having a firearm in the home at day of intervention delivery (day 0) and thus were included in analysis.

"One thing some people consider doing to reduce risk of suicide or injury for themselves and others in their household is to securely store all firearms. On a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is not at all, and 10 is completely, how would you rate your readiness to \[make a change\] like that?" Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=20 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Readiness to Securely Store All Firearms
4.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery at visit #1 (day 0)

Population: 30 participants reported having medications in the home at day of intervention delivery (day 0) and thus were included in analysis.

"One thing some people consider doing to reduce risk of suicide or injury for themselves and others in their household is to securely store all medications. On a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is not at all, and 10 is completely, how would you rate your readiness to \[make a change\]?" Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=30 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Readiness to Securely Store All Medications
3.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: 19 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week visit and reported having a firearm in the home were included in analysis

Number of firearms in household: Answer range: 0 to 10,000

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=19 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Number of Firearms in Household
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
2.7 firearms
Standard Deviation 2.8
Average Number of Firearms in Household
4 weeks
6.1 firearms
Standard Deviation 14.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended their 4 week visit were analyzed.

Count represents number of participants who said 'very often' or 'always'. "To what extent have you had difficulty remembering to take your medications in the past month?" Likert responses: * Never * Rarely * Sometimes * Very Often * Always

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Who Forget to Take Their Medications Often/Always
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: 19 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week visits and reported being a firearm owner were included in analysis.

Changes in whether household firearms are present in a participant's home from day of intervention delivery (day 0) to 4 weeks. Count represents the number of participants who reported having at least 1 firearm in their home.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=19 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants With Firearms Present in the Home
4 weeks
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Firearms Present in the Home
Day of intervention delivery (day 0)
18 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: This measure was only administered to participants who reported having firearms in the home and was the owner of at least 1 of those household firearms. At day of intervention delivery (day 0), 17 participants reported owning at least one firearm in their home. At the 4-week follow-up, 14 participants reported owning at least one firearm in their home.

Changes in whether household firearms are stored securely. Count represents number of participants who had 'all' firearms locked. "Are any firearms in or around your home currently stored locked?" Answers: * Yes, all of them are locked * Yes, some of them are locked * None of them are locked * I'm not sure * Decline to respond

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=17 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Securely Storing All Firearms
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
8 Participants
Number of Participants Securely Storing All Firearms
4 weeks
7 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week follow up visits were analyzed.

Changes in whether present medication are all stored securely. Count represents the number of participants who stored 'all' of their medications locked. "Are the medications in your home currently stored locked? (Examples include using a locked cabinet or box)" Answer options: * Yes, all of the medications in my home are locked up * Yes, some of the medications in my home are locked up * None of the medications in my home are locked up * I'm not sure

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Securely Storing All Medications
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
0 Participants
Number of Participants Securely Storing All Medications
4 weeks
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: 19 participants who attended both their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and 4 week visits and reported having a firearm in the home were included in analysis.

"On a scale of 0 to 10, to what extent do you keep your firearms to protect yourself or your loved ones from other people? Someone who answers 0 does not consider themselves to keep firearms for protection, while someone who answers 10 considers that their firearms are absolutely required for protection." Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=19 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Importance of Firearm Ownership for Protection
Day of intervention delivery (day 0)
6.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
Average Importance of Firearm Ownership for Protection
4 Weeks
6.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0)

Population: 20 participants reported having a firearm in the home at day of intervention delivery (day 0) and thus were included in analysis.

"One of the safest things someone can do while they're going through a difficult time is to store their firearms outside of the home with someone they trust. On a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is not at all, and 10 is completely, how would you rate your readiness to \[make a change\] like that?" Answer range: 0-10

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=20 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Average Participant Readiness to Store Firearms Outside of the Home With Someone They Trust
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.47

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: This measure was only asked to participants who reported having firearms in the home and some or all of the firearm(s) in the home were locked. 11 participants met this criteria at their day of intervention delivery (day 0) and thus were analyzed. At 4 weeks, 10 participants met this criteria and thus were analyzed for this measure.

Count of people who said they do not have access to the key/combination for their locked firearm. "For the firearms in your home that are locked, who has access to the keys or number combinations that would be needed to access them?" Answer options: * You * Your spouse or partner * Children under the age of 18 years * Children 18 years of age or older * A friend * A neighbor * Other:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=11 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants Who Do Not Have Access to Locked Firearm(s)
4 weeks
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Do Not Have Access to Locked Firearm(s)
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: The presence of ammunition in the home was only asked to participants who stated there were firearms in the home and that they were the owner of at least 1 of the firearms in the home. At baseline, 17 participants were asked about presence of ammunition in the home. At 4 weeks, 14 participants were asked about presence of ammunition in the home.

Changes from day of intervention delivery (day 0) to 4 weeks in whether household ammunition is present. The presence of ammunition in the home was only asked to participants who stated there were firearms in the home and that they were the owner of at least 1 of the firearms in the home. Count represents number of participants who reported having ammunition in the home.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=17 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants With Ammunition in the Home
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Ammunition in the Home
4 weeks
12 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks

Population: This measure was only asked to participants who reported that there were firearms in the home, that they were the owner of at least 1 of the firearms in the home, and that there was ammunition in the home. At baseline, 14 participants were asked about ammunition storage. At 4 weeks, 12 participants were asked about ammunition storage.

Count of participants who reported having 'all' ammunition in the home securely locked. This measure was only asked to participants who reported that there were firearms in the home, that they were the owner of at least 1 of the firearms in the home, and that there was ammunition in the home. "Is ammunition in or around your home currently stored in a locked place, such as a locked cabinet?" Answer options: * Yes, all of the ammunition is locked * Yes, some of the ammunition is locked * None of the ammunition is locked * I'm not sure * No ammunition is in my home

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=14 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants With All Ammunition Locked
Day of intervention delivery - day 0
7 Participants
Number of Participants With All Ammunition Locked
4 weeks
6 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 8 weeks

Population: All 36 participants who attended their 4 week follow up were analyzed.

Count of participants who have a naloxone prescription (yes/no). Verified through each participant's electronic health record.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=36 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants With Naloxone Prescription in Participant Electronic Health Record
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 8 weeks

Population: 22 participants accepted a medication return envelope and were thus analyzed for this measure.

Verification of returned medication safety envelope (yes/no). Count represents number of participants who utilized their medication return envelope.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Arm
n=22 Participants
There is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Number of Participants With Verified Return of Medication Safety Envelope
5 Participants

Adverse Events

Intervention Arm

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Joseph Simonetti

Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center

Phone: (720) 723-6491

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place