Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effects of Chiropractic in a Population With High Central Adiposity (NCT NCT06208163)
NCT ID: NCT06208163
Last Updated: 2026-05-08
Results Overview
The number of adults attending the on-site screening who are eligible to participate, divided to the total number of adults attending the on-site screening. This assesses 'Eligibility'
COMPLETED
NA
18 participants
From lab arrival to completion of on-site screening (up to 15 minutes)
2026-05-08
Participant Flow
Recruitment began on November 11, 2024, and ended on September 4, 2025. Participants were recruited via word of mouth, flyers, social media posts, trial registries, and newspaper advertisements.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Chiropractic Care
6 weeks of chiropractic care
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The Effects of Chiropractic in a Population With High Central Adiposity
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Chiropractic Care
n=18 Participants
6 weeks of chiropractic care
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.77 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02 • n=41 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black/African American
|
7 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · White/European
|
7 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Latino/Hispanic
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Asian
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Mixed
|
2 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
18 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
38.62 kg/meters squared
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16 • n=41 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From lab arrival to completion of on-site screening (up to 15 minutes)The number of adults attending the on-site screening who are eligible to participate, divided to the total number of adults attending the on-site screening. This assesses 'Eligibility'
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=19 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Potential Participants Who Are Eligible.
|
0.95 Proportion
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of lifestyle restriction window to lab arrival (up to 24 hours)The number of participants complying with 24hr and 3hr pre-baseline lifestyle restrictions, divided by the total number of participants. This assesses 'Compliance'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=18 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Complying With Pre-baseline Lifestyle Restrictions
|
1.00 Proportion
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From enrollment to completion of baseline assessments (up to 2 hours)The number of participants able to complete baseline assessments as directed, divided by the total number of participants. This assesses 'Tolerability'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=18 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Able to Tolerate the Assessments
|
0.94 Proportion
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of treatment (up to 6 weeks)Population: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to their initial chiropractic session and therefore were not prescribed a care plan.
The number of participants prescribed a chiropractic care plan that attended ≥80% of their chiropractic sessions, divided by the total number of participants prescribed a chiropractic care plan. This assesses 'Adherence'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Adhering to Their Prescribed Care Plan
|
0.87 Proportion
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From enrollment to end of treatment (up to 6 weeks)Number of participants enrolled who attend the final assessment session, divided by the total number of participants enrolled. This assesses 'Retention'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=18 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Retained in the Study
|
0.78 Proportion
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in self-reported autonomic function per the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31) survey. The COMPASS-31 is a 31-item questionnaire that evaluates ANS functioning across 6 domains: 1) orthostatic intolerance (4-items), 2) vasomotor (3-items), 3) secretomotor (4-items), 4) gastrointestinal (12-items), 5) bladder (3-items), and 6) pupillomotor (5-items). The domains are weighted, and the sum of the weighted sub-scores yields a total raw score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater autonomic dysfunction with total raw scores ≥20 suggested to reflect moderate-to-severe autonomic dysfunction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in COMPASS-31 Raw Scores
ΔCOMPASS-31 (2 weeks)
|
-5.95 raw scores on a scale
Interval -7.63 to -4.28
|
|
Changes in COMPASS-31 Raw Scores
ΔCOMPASS-31 (6 weeks)
|
-4.89 raw scores on a scale
Interval -6.61 to -3.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in perceived stress levels per the 10-item NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). NIH Toolbox negative emotion measures utilize a 7-day recall period, 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=never, 2=almost never, 3=sometimes, 4=fairly often, 5=very often). Total raw scores can range from 10 to 50. Raw scores are converted to standardized uncorrected T-scores (mean=50, SD=10) using conversion tables available in the online scoring instructions (https://www.healthmeasures.net/). Higher scores indicate greater levels of perceived stress with T-scores ≥60 deemed 'potentially problematic'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in PSS-10 T-scores
ΔPSS-10 (2 weeks)
|
-5.42 T-score
Interval -8.69 to -2.15
|
|
Changes in PSS-10 T-scores
ΔPSS-10 (6 weeks)
|
-3.57 T-score
Interval -6.87 to -0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in self-reported cognitive function per the 8-item PROMIS Cognitive Function (PROMIS-Cog 8) survey. It uses a 7-day recall period and relevant 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Total raw scores can range from 8 to 40. Raw scores are converted to a standardized T-score (mean=50, SD=10) using conversion tables available in the scoring instructions at the PROMIS® website (https://www.healthmeasures.net/). Lower scores indicate greater functional impairment with standard benchmarks for mild (T-score = 40 to 45), moderate (T-score = 30 to 40), or severe (T-score \<30) impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in PROMIS-Cog 8 T-scores
ΔPROMIS-Cog 8 (6 weeks)
|
2.21 T-score
Interval -0.35 to 4.76
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-Cog 8 T-scores
ΔPROMIS-Cog 8 (2 weeks)
|
3.69 T-score
Interval 1.21 to 6.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in self-reported health per the T-scored PROMIS-29 subscales (physical function, social participation, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance). It uses a 7-day recall period and relevant 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always).Total raw scores can range from 4 to 20. Raw subscale scores are converted to a standardized T-score (mean=50, SD=10) using conversion tables available in the scoring instructions at the PROMIS® website (https://www.healthmeasures.net/). Lower scores on physical function, and social participation subscales indicate greater functional impairment with standard benchmarks for mild (T-score = 40 to 45), moderate (T-score = 30 to 40), or severe (T-score \<30) impairment. Higher scores on the anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance subscales indicate greater severity of symptoms with standard benchmarks for mild (T-score = 55 to 60), moderate (T-score = 60 to 70), and severe (T-score \>70) symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Physical Function (2 weeks)
|
1.02 T-score
Interval -1.8 to 3.84
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Physical Function (6 weeks)
|
2.31 T-score
Interval -0.6 to 5.21
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Social Participation (2 weeks)
|
-1.34 T-score
Interval -4.06 to 1.38
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Social Participation (6 weeks)
|
2.61 T-score
Interval -0.24 to 5.45
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Anxiety (2 weeks)
|
-2.05 T-score
Interval -6.21 to 2.11
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Anxiety (6 weeks)
|
-2.43 T-score
Interval -6.69 to 1.82
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Depression (2 weeks)
|
-1.49 T-score
Interval -3.43 to 0.46
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Depression (6 weeks)
|
0.11 T-score
Interval -1.9 to 2.13
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Fatigue (2 weeks)
|
-0.88 T-score
Interval -5.18 to 3.42
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Fatigue (6 weeks)
|
-1.92 T-score
Interval -6.29 to 2.45
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Sleep Disturbance (2 weeks)
|
-1.21 T-score
Interval -4.14 to 1.72
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale T-scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Sleep Disturbance (6 weeks)
|
-3.90 T-score
Interval -6.89 to -0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Change in self-reported pain levels per the raw scored PROMIS-29 subscales (pain intensity). This subscale uses a 7-day recall period and is a single item scored on a 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale Raw Scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Pain Intensity (2 weeks)
|
-0.58 Raw score
Interval -1.22 to 0.07
|
|
Changes in PROMIS-29 Subscale Raw Scores
ΔPROMIS-29 Pain Intensity (6 weeks)
|
0.28 Raw score
Interval -0.37 to 0.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in ECG-derived root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) during rest, stress, and recovery. RMSSD is a time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) metric used to assess cardiac-related parasympathetic activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in RMSSD
ΔRMSSD at rest (2 weeks)
|
-4.72 msec
Interval -13.28 to 4.35
|
|
Changes in RMSSD
ΔRMSSD at rest (6 weeks)
|
1.27 msec
Interval -8.13 to 10.67
|
|
Changes in RMSSD
ΔRMSSD during stress (2 weeks)
|
-3.39 msec
Interval -7.75 to 0.97
|
|
Changes in RMSSD
ΔRMSSD during stress (6 weeks)
|
-4.22 msec
Interval -8.64 to 0.2
|
|
Changes in RMSSD
ΔRMSSD during recovery (2 weeks)
|
-1.60 msec
Interval -7.02 to 3.81
|
|
Changes in RMSSD
ΔRMSSD during recovery (6 weeks)
|
-0.79 msec
Interval -6.47 to 4.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in impedance cardiography (ICG)-derived pre-ejection period (PEP) during rest, stress, and recovery. PEP is a time-domain metric used to assess cardiac-related sympathetic activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in PEP
ΔPEP during recovery (2 weeks)
|
-3.28 msec
Interval -11.8 to 5.24
|
|
Changes in PEP
ΔPEP during recovery (6 weeks)
|
-0.29 msec
Interval -8.82 to 8.25
|
|
Changes in PEP
ΔPEP at rest (2 weeks)
|
1.89 msec
Interval -2.42 to 6.2
|
|
Changes in PEP
ΔPEP during stress (6 weeks)
|
1.99 msec
Interval -3.24 to 7.22
|
|
Changes in PEP
ΔPEP at rest (6 weeks)
|
-0.13 msec
Interval -4.88 to 4.62
|
|
Changes in PEP
ΔPEP during stress (2 weeks)
|
-0.29 msec
Interval -5.41 to 4.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeksPopulation: Note: Of the 18 enrolled participants, 3 and 4 withdrew or were withdrawn prior to the 2- and 6-week assessments, respectively.
Changes in salivary-derived secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) levels at rest. Salivary-derived sIgA is a measure of mucosal immune function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Potential Participants
n=15 Participants
All potential participants who attended the on-site screening session.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in sIgA
ΔsIgA (2 weeks)
|
-75.70 µg/mL
Interval -115.0 to -36.6
|
|
Changes in sIgA
ΔsIgA (6 weeks)
|
-54.10 µg/mL
Interval -94.0 to -14.3
|
Adverse Events
Chiropractic Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Chiropractic Care
n=18 participants at risk
6 weeks of chiropractic care
|
|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Elevated BP
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment to completion of baseline assessments (up to 2 hours)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place