Hair Removal: Intense Pulsed Light Versus Diode Laser
NCT06179186 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48
Last updated 2025-08-27
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two hair removal techniques: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and Diode Laser in woman underarm. .
Main Questions:
* Determine the thread count in a 4cm² quadrant in the central axillary region before each session, 4-6 weeks after the last session and at follow-up 30 weeks after the last session;
* Measure the thickness of the hair before each session, 4-6 weeks after the last session and at follow-up 6 months after the last session;
* Compare the level of pain during procedures;
* Evaluate the volunteer's level of satisfaction after the end of the sessions programmed by the study;
* Evaluate quality of life and self-image before and after the end of the sessions programmed by the study;
* Evaluate the maintenance of results 6 months after the last procedure performed.
Researchers will compare IPL and Diode laser to see if hair removal is similar at short and long time course.
The IPL treatment will be applied to one axilla. The 800nm Diode Laser treatment will be applied to the other axilla. Treatment allocation will be randomized for each participant. Participants will undergo monthly sessions for four months, totaling four treatments. Follow-up assessments will occur 30 days and 6 months after the final session.
Conditions
- Hair Removal
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Intense Pulsed Light
The axilla will be treated with intense pulsed light, being right or left, depending upon randomization.
- DEVICE
-
Diode Laser
The axilla will be treated with diode laser, being right or left, depending upon randomization.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Nove de Julho
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Christiane Pavani, PhD · University of Nove de Julho
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2024-11-30
- Completion
- 2024-11-30
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Low Fluence 1064nm Laser Hair Reduction for Pseudofolliculitis Barbae in Skin Types IV, V, VI
NCT00402129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Photodynamic Therapy for Permanent Hair Removal
NCT00371930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
A Prospective Multi-Center Study of a Novel Dual-Wavelength Laser for Hair Removal
NCT02536092 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Combined 755nm Alexandrite Laser With Bipolar RF for Hair Reduction
NCT02465788 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Trio Laser Module for Hair Removal Treatment
NCT04599751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of an Ultra-speed Picosecond Laser for Treating Tattoos
NCT03386760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of GentleMax Pro™/GentleMax Pro Plus™
NCT04975243 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of LightSheer Duet 805nm HS Handpiece
NCT01801202 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Using LEORTEC-300 System For Hair Removal Treatment
NCT00348257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060 nm Diode Laser (Flanks)
NCT03756168 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Picosecond and Nanosecond Q-switched Lasers for Tattoo Removal
NCT01973166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the LightSheer HS Hand Piece as Compared to the LightSheer ET Hand Piece for the Intended Use of Hair Removal and Permanent Hair Reduction
NCT00657085 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Safety and Efficacy of 1064-nm Picosecond Laser With Microlens Array for Pore Tightening; a Pilot Study
NCT04471948 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of the Me Mini Device for Hair Removal
NCT02912013 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Split-tattoo Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of 670nm Picosecond Laser Versus 755 nm for Tattoo Removal
NCT02912507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tattoo Particles: Picosecond Laser Versus Nanosecond Laser
NCT06431464 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Efficacy and Safety of 1565-nm Non-ablative Fractional Laser Versus Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Enlarged Facial Pores
NCT05360043 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of a 1064-nm Fractional Picosecond Laser Versus IPL in Facial Rejuvenation
NCT07122310 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Red and Infrared Photobiomodulation in Rhinoplasty at a Single Centre
NCT07033039 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long-Pulsed Dye Laser and Intense Pulsed Light for Skin Rejuvenation.
NCT00375141 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Polylevolactic Acid Injection Combined With 1565nm Non-ablative Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Striae Distensae
NCT05827913 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Single-Center Open-Label Study of 1064 nm for Nonablative Skin Rejuvenation
NCT03421691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 755nm Alexandrite Laser Versus Nanosecond 755nm Alexandrite
NCT01811017 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Device for Hair Removal
NCT01057134 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Study of Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Durations Using a Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser for Tattoo Removal
NCT02244554 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA