Comparison Of Outcomes After Knee Arthroplasty Using Posterior-Substituting Versus Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses

NCT06170931 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2024-12-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Total knee replacement is used in the treatment of patients with knee arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and other knee disorders. Today, there are basically two designs; It cuts the posterior cruciate ligament (PS) and protects the posterior cruciate ligament (CR). Although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better, research on this subject has increased recently. the investigators aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other. Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately. WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees.

Conditions

  • Total Knee Arthroplasty

Interventions

PROCEDURE

posterior cruciate ligament-retaining prostheses

Posterior cruciate ligament protective approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis

PROCEDURE

posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses

Posterior cruciate ligament transection approach in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Bezmialem Vakif University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-04-14
Primary Completion
2023-09-20
Completion
2024-07-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06170931 on ClinicalTrials.gov