Comparison of Three Different Surgical Approaches on the Functional Outcome After Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT06141928 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2023-11-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aimed to determine differences in functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty between a group of patients operated on using a direct lateral approach, an anterolateral minimally invasive approach, and a posterior approach to the hip joint.

Arthroplasty is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in orthopedics and is also considered the gold standard for treating the final stage of osteoarthritis. There are several different approaches, but there are still conflicting studies that talk about the benefits of a particular approach. There is an insufficient number of scientific, prospective studies that monitor the basic functional and rehabilitation parameters, which are also indicators of the success of the performed procedure.

Conditions

  • Total Hip Arthroplasty
  • Functional Recovery

Interventions

OTHER

Functional recovery analysis

Functional recovery analysis with force evaluator \& tester

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Special Hospital for Orthopedics Biograd na Moru

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Clinic for Orthopedics Lovran

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Antea Buterin, MD · Clinic OL

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-01
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • Croatia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06141928 on ClinicalTrials.gov