S-ESP and Ring Block in Circümcision Surgery (S-ESP: Sacral Erectör Spinae Plane Block).

NCT06136000 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2024-04-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Although it is not known exactly when and where circumcision was first performed, it is claimed that it was first performed by the Egyptians, according to various beliefs and traditions. Circumcision is the surgical removal of the skin surrounding the glans penis in pediatric male patients and is the most commonly performed surgery in boys (4). Because the foreskin is sensitive and the pain threshold is low, patients experience severe pain in the postoperative period. Various analgesic methods have been developed to reduce this pain. Sacral surgery has started to be used in adult patients in recent years, but there is not enough information about its application in pediatric patients. Sacral erector spinae plane block is on the agenda. While sacral erectör spinae plane block was first applied in gender reassignment and pilonidal sinus surgery in adults, it was also applied to a small extent in hypospadias and anoplasty surgery in pediatric patients. In some studies, circumcision surgery involves the root and distal parts of the penis. It has been emphasized that ring blocks applied with anesthesia also have an analgesic effect. Our aim in this study was to compare the effect of S-ESPB and ring block on postoperative Face, Legs, Movement, Crying, Avocative Behavioral Scale pain scores in pediatric patients undergoing circumcision surgery and to compare the number of patients who required rescue analgesia, the time until the first rescue analgesia, possible complications, and parental satisfaction (a Likert scale will be used).

In this study, we found that sacral erectör spinae plane block is different from the ring block applied in routine practice in circumcision surgery. We think that postoperative analgesic effectiveness will be higher.

Our aim in this study was to compare the effect of sacral erectör spinae plane block and ring block on postoperative Face, Legs, Movement, Crying, Avocative Behavioral Scale pain score in pediatric patients undergoing circumcision surgery and to compare the number of patients who required rescue analgesia secondarily, the time until the first rescue analgesia, possible complications and parental satisfaction (Likert scale will be used).

Conditions

  • Pain
  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

OTHER

Sacral erectör spinae plane block

Group S will be placed on their side. Asepsis is fifth in the transverse plane under antisepsis standards. high-frequency linear USG probe into the spinous process . The USG probe will be shifted caudally to visualize the first and second median sacral crest. The USG probe is then placed on the second medial It will be placed 3-4 cm lateral to the sacral apex and the mid-sacral apex will be imaged. On the USG screen, from top to bottom, erector spinae muscle, multifidus muscle and sacral intermediate The crest will be displayed. 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered in a total volume of 0.5ml/kg (maximum 20 cc ) by applying negative aspiration with the in-plane technique with a 50 mm Stimuplex A needle.

OTHER

Ring Block

The patient is under general anesthesia. Before the surgical procedure begins, the pediatric surgeon administers 0.5ml/kg (maximum 20cc) 0.25% bupivacaine to the base of the root of the penis with a 25-gauge needle at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Konya City Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
4 Years
Max Age
16 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-12-19
Primary Completion
2024-04-15
Completion
2024-04-15

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06136000 on ClinicalTrials.gov