Trial Outcomes & Findings for LA-CEAL 4.0: Wearable Sensor Project (NCT NCT06086028)
NCT ID: NCT06086028
Last Updated: 2025-10-17
Results Overview
The proportion of days in concordance was calculated based on responses to two questions. The first question seeks to determine if participants accurately understand their biometric data and will ask "how stressed are you today?" (Scale 1-10 a score of 6+ was coded as "high stress"). The second question seeks to determine if participants attended to the information regarding their stress level and will ask "did you complete a self-care activity today?" (yes = 1 /no = 0). Concordance was coded when participants either a) reported a high level of stress and engaged in self-care or b) when participants reported low levels of stress and did not engage in self-care. Percentage of days in concordance was calculated for both 21-day feedback periods (immediate versus delayed).
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
6 weeks
2025-10-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Immediate Then Delayed Arm
The participants received immediate access to the data from the wearable sensor for 21 days. On day 22, all of the data from the wearable sensor was hidden from the participant (delayed) until after the second 21-day feedback period. Wrist worn sensor: Biostrap collected biometrics such as the following: (1) sleep pattern/ quality; (2) steps, activity, calories; (3) heart rate/ HRV; (4) respiratory rate.
|
Delayed Then Immediate Arm
The participants began the first 21-day feedback period with their data from the wearable sensor hidden (delayed feedback). On day 22 the wearable sensor changed to become available in real time (immediate feedback) for the second 21-day feedback period. Wrist worn sensor: Biostrap collected biometrics such as the following: (1) sleep pattern/ quality; (2) steps, activity, calories; (3) heart rate/ HRV; (4) respiratory rate.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
37
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Immediate Then Delayed Arm
The participants received immediate access to the data from the wearable sensor for 21 days. On day 22, all of the data from the wearable sensor was hidden from the participant (delayed) until after the second 21-day feedback period. Wrist worn sensor: Biostrap collected biometrics such as the following: (1) sleep pattern/ quality; (2) steps, activity, calories; (3) heart rate/ HRV; (4) respiratory rate.
|
Delayed Then Immediate Arm
The participants began the first 21-day feedback period with their data from the wearable sensor hidden (delayed feedback). On day 22 the wearable sensor changed to become available in real time (immediate feedback) for the second 21-day feedback period. Wrist worn sensor: Biostrap collected biometrics such as the following: (1) sleep pattern/ quality; (2) steps, activity, calories; (3) heart rate/ HRV; (4) respiratory rate.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Immediate Then Delayed Arm
n=40 Participants
The participants will receive immediate access to the data from the wearable sensor for 21 days. On day 22 all of the data from the wearable sensor will be hidden from the participant (delayed) until after the second 21-day feedback period. Wrist worn sensor: Biostrap collects biometrics such as the following: (1) sleep pattern/ quality; (2) steps, activity, calories; (3) heart rate/ HRV; (4) respiratory rate.
|
Delayed Then Immediate Arm
n=40 Participants
The participants begin the first 21-day feedback period with their data from the wearable sensor hidden (delayed feedback). On day 22 the wearable sensor changes to become available in real time (immediate feedback) for the second 21-day feedback period. Wrist worn sensor: Biostrap collects biometrics such as the following: (1) sleep pattern/ quality; (2) steps, activity, calories; (3) heart rate/ HRV; (4) respiratory rate.
|
Total
n=80 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
0 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
37 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
37 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
74 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
2 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
5 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.51 • n=40 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
44.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.28 • n=39 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
45.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.40 • n=79 Participants • 1 participant in delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
36 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
72 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
3 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
7 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
2 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
1 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
1 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
0 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
14 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
16 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
30 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
21 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
21 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
42 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
1 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
1 Participants
n=39 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
3 Participants
n=79 Participants • 1 participant in the delayed access start arm did not respond to this question
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=80 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Cross-over design. 71 participants were monitored during both immediate and delayed information periods.
The proportion of days in concordance was calculated based on responses to two questions. The first question seeks to determine if participants accurately understand their biometric data and will ask "how stressed are you today?" (Scale 1-10 a score of 6+ was coded as "high stress"). The second question seeks to determine if participants attended to the information regarding their stress level and will ask "did you complete a self-care activity today?" (yes = 1 /no = 0). Concordance was coded when participants either a) reported a high level of stress and engaged in self-care or b) when participants reported low levels of stress and did not engage in self-care. Percentage of days in concordance was calculated for both 21-day feedback periods (immediate versus delayed).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Days in Concordance Comparing Immediate Information Period With Delayed Information Period
|
0.49 % of days concordant
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.50 % of days concordant
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline - 6 weeksPopulation: 57 participants responded to the burnout scale on baseline and 6 weeks follow-up assessment. For this outcome measure, the burnout scale was given at baseline and at 6 weeks follow up, it was not reassessed at crossover, so the investigators didn't calculate the scale for the conditions assessed for each arm to be reported separately.
The investigators measured the change in the burnout score in all participants between baseline and 6 weeks follow-up. Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS-MP) is a 22-item survey that covers 3 areas: Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and low sense of Personal Accomplishment (PA). Each subscale includes multiple questions with frequency rating choices of Never (0), A few times a year or less, Once a month or less, A few times a month, Once a week, A few times a week, or Every day (6). The total score is calculated by summing the three sub-scales and ranges from 0-132 with high scores reflecting higher symptoms of burnout and low scores reflecting fewer symptoms of burnout.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=57 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=57 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Burnout Score From Baseline to Follow-up (Pre/Post Sensor Data Collection)
|
38.82 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.48
|
35.54 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.24
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline - 6 weeksPopulation: 57 participants responded to the burnout scale on baseline and 6 weeks follow-up assessment. For this outcome measure, the total burnout score was given at baseline and at 6 weeks follow up, it was not reassessed at crossover, so the investigators didn't calculate the score for the conditions assessed for each arm to be reported separately.
The investigators measured the mean in the total burnout score of the immediate then delayed arm to the delayed then immediate arm. Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS-MP) is a 22-item survey that covers 3 areas: Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and low sense of Personal Accomplishment (PA). Each subscale includes multiple questions with frequency rating choices of Never (0), A few times a year or less, Once a month or less, A few times a month, Once a week, A few times a week, or Every day (6). The total score is calculated by summing the three sub-scales and ranges from 0-132 with high scores reflecting higher symptoms of burnout and low scores reflecting fewer symptoms of burnout.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=32 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=25 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean in Total Burnout Score of Immediate Then Delayed Arm to Delayed Then Immediate Arm
|
-2.03 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.61
|
-4.88 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.01
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline - 6 weeksPopulation: 74 participants responded to the depression questionnaire at both baseline and 6 weeks follow-up. For this outcome measure, the depression score was given at baseline and at 6 weeks follow up, it was not reassessed at crossover, so the investigators didn't calculate the score for the conditions assessed for each arm to be reported separately.
The investigators compared the mean in total depression score of immediate then delayed arm to delayed then immediate arm. The score is a 2-item depression screener (Patient Health Questionnaire-revised). The range is from 0 to 6. The high scores reflect higher symptoms of depression, and low scores reflect fewer symptoms of depression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=38 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=36 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean in Total Depression Score of Immediate Then Delayed Arm to Delayed Then Immediate Arm
|
0.08 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.17 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline - 6 weeksPopulation: 74 participants responded to the anxiety question at baseline and 6 weeks follow-up assessments. For this outcome measure, the total anxiety score was given at baseline and at 6 weeks follow up, it was not reassessed at crossover, so the investigators didn't calculate the score for the conditions assessed for each arm to be reported separately.
The investigators compared the mean in total anxiety score of immediate then delayed arm to delayed then immediate arm. The score is a 2-item anxiety screener (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale- revised). The range is from 0 to 6. The high scores reflect higher symptoms of anxiety, and low scores reflect fewer symptoms of anxiety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=38 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=36 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean in Total Anxiety Score of Immediate Then Delayed Arm to Delayed Then Immediate Arm
|
-0.05 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
-0.06 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline - 6 weeksPopulation: 73 participants responded to the resilience questions on baseline and 6 weeks follow-up assessments. For this outcome measure, the total resilience score was given at baseline and at 6 weeks follow up, it was not reassessed at crossover, so the investigators didn't calculate the score for the conditions assessed for each arm to be reported separately.
The investigators compared the mean in total resilience score of immediate then delayed arm to delayed then immediate arm. The score is a 4-item brief resilient coping scale. The range is from 4 to 20. The high scores reflect higher resilience, and low scores reflect lower resilience.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=38 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=35 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean in Total Resilience Score of Immediate Then Delayed Arm to Delayed Then Immediate Arm
|
0.42 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
0.71 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Cross-over design. 69 participants monitored during both immediate and delayed information periods.
The investigators measured the change in the participant sleep efficiency score in all participants between the 2 conditions to compare the difference across the conditions. Sleep efficiency score is measured via the wearable sensor. It is comprised of the following information: sleep duration (end-start), minutes in light sleep, minutes in deep sleep, stages of sleep (e.g. REM), arousal count. The range is from 0 to 100. Higher sleep efficiency scores reflect better quality sleep. Low sleep efficiency scores reflect poor quality of sleep
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=69 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=69 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean on Participant Sleep Score Between Immediate Information Period and Delayed Information Period
|
79.11 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.88
|
77.21 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.35
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Cross-over design. 69 participants monitored in both immediate and delayed information periods.
Activity level was measured by number of steps and distance measured by the wearable sensors. Higher scores reflect more activity while lower scores reflect less activity. An average of the daily activity level scores was calculated for each information period. Biostrap company calculated the activity score using the activity distribution over the course of a 24-hour window, emphasizing consistent physical activity of 500 steps per hour during 12 unique hours. There are no scale ranges for this activity score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=69 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=69 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean on Participant Activity Level Score Between Immediate Information Period and Delayed Information Period
|
62.21 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.12
|
60.54 Change in score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.22
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Cross-over design. 71 participants monitored in both immediate and delayed information periods.
Respiratory rate was measured as breathing rate per minute and was recorded via the wearable sensor. Higher values reflect faster breathing which is a proxy measure of stress while lower values reflect slower breathing. An average respiratory rate was calculated for each information period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Respiratory Rate Between Immediate Information Period and Delayed Information Period
|
16.96 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
16.95 Breaths per minute
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Cross-over design. 71 participants monitored in both immediate and delayed information periods.
HRV was calculated using root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) using beats per minute recorded via the wearable sensor. HRV scale is 0-255. Normal scores depend on age and sex. HRV is used as a proxy measure of stress and cardiovascular health. An average HRV was calculated for each information period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Participant Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Between Immediate Information Period and Delayed Information Period
|
32.63 Milliseconds
Standard Deviation 14.93
|
33.06 Milliseconds
Standard Deviation 15.73
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Cross-over design. 71 participants monitored in both immediate and delayed information periods.
Heart rate is measured as beats per minute and was recorded by the wearable sensor. High values reflect faster pulse while lower values reflect lower pulse. Normal ranges for resting adult heart rate is 60 to 100. Higher heart rate is a proxy measure for stress and anxiety. An average heart rate was calculated for each information period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was able to view their sensor data in real time.
|
Delayed Information Period
n=71 Participants
Three week period during which each participant was not able to view their sensor data in real time. They were able to view their data after the delayed information period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Participant Heart Rate Between Immediate Information Period and Delayed Information Period
|
79.00 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
79.32 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
Adverse Events
Immediate Information Period
Delayed Information Period
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place