Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) (NCT NCT06059846)

NCT ID: NCT06059846

Last Updated: 2026-03-10

Results Overview

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

1690 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At Day 17 (TOC)

Results posted on

2026-03-10

Participant Flow

The planned enrollment for the full study was 2648 participants. As specified in the protocol, a pre-planned interim analysis occurred when approximately 60% of participants reached the test-of-cure visit. The study met the primary endpoint for efficacy at the interim analysis and the study was stopped. Enrollment was paused during the interim analysis. Therefore, a total of 1690 participants were enrolled in the study at various investigative sites from 21 Dec 2023 to 06 Feb 2025.

Participants with a clinical diagnosis of complicated urinary tract infection/acute pyelonephritis (cUTI/AP) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) or imipenem-cilastatin.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 milligrams (mg), two x 300mg film-coated tablets, orally (PO) and a dummy infusion intravenously (IV), every 6 hours (q6h) from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than (\>) 30 millilitres per minute (mL/min) and less than or equal to (≤) 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl less than (\<) 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl levels greater than or equal to (≥) 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Overall Study
STARTED
844
846
Overall Study
ITT Population
844
846
Overall Study
Micro-ITT Population
446
483
Overall Study
COMPLETED
810
818
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34
28

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 milligrams (mg), two x 300mg film-coated tablets, orally (PO) and a dummy infusion intravenously (IV), every 6 hours (q6h) from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than (\>) 30 millilitres per minute (mL/min) and less than or equal to (≤) 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl less than (\<) 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl levels greater than or equal to (≥) 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
1
Overall Study
Death
1
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
8
4
Overall Study
Participant Noncompliance/Uncooperativeness
7
7
Overall Study
Protocol Deviation
0
1
Overall Study
Subject Withdrawal of Consent
16
14

Baseline Characteristics

A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=843 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=844 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Total
n=1687 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
794 Participants
n=68 Participants
801 Participants
n=69 Participants
1595 Participants
n=137 Participants
Age, Continuous
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.13 • n=68 Participants
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.28 • n=69 Participants
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.20 • n=137 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
437 Participants
n=68 Participants
478 Participants
n=69 Participants
915 Participants
n=137 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
406 Participants
n=68 Participants
366 Participants
n=69 Participants
772 Participants
n=137 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants
n=68 Participants
47 Participants
n=69 Participants
85 Participants
n=137 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
805 Participants
n=68 Participants
797 Participants
n=69 Participants
1602 Participants
n=137 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=69 Participants
0 Participants
n=137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=69 Participants
0 Participants
n=137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
29 Participants
n=68 Participants
25 Participants
n=69 Participants
54 Participants
n=137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=69 Participants
0 Participants
n=137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants
n=68 Participants
17 Participants
n=69 Participants
36 Participants
n=137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=68 Participants
1 Participants
n=69 Participants
2 Participants
n=137 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
0 Participants
n=69 Participants
0 Participants
n=137 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 17 (TOC)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data reported is at the TOC timepoint only.

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population
Responder
261 Participants
291 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population
Non-responder
171 Participants
179 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population
Indeterminate
14 Participants
13 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 17 (TOC)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and clinically evaluable (CE) populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at the TOC timepoint only.

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=410 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=452 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
Responder
250 Participants
282 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
Non-responder
160 Participants
170 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and LFU timepoints only.

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Non-responders
10 Participants
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Responders
426 Participants
454 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Indeterminate
10 Participants
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Responders
214 Participants
257 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Non-responders
222 Participants
219 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Indeterminate
10 Participants
7 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and clinically evaluable (CE) populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and LFU timepoints only.

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=428 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=466 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME Population
EOT · Non-responder
5 Participants
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME Population
EOT · Responder
423 Participants
454 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME Population
LFU · Responder
204 Participants
239 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME Population
LFU · Non-responder
202 Participants
200 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture.

Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Clinical Cure
438 Participants
477 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Clinical Failure
7 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Clinical Indeterminate
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC · Clinical Cure
417 Participants
460 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC · Clinical Failure
20 Participants
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC · Clinical Indeterminate
9 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Clinical Cure
392 Participants
428 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Clinical Failure
43 Participants
46 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Clinical Indeterminate
11 Participants
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The CE population includes participants in the ITT Population or all randomized participants, with no major protocol deviations who received ≥8 doses of study drug (or \<8 if discontinued due to AE or death), had ≥80% treatment compliance, achieved clinical cure or failure at EOT, TOC, or LFU, had a cUTI/AP diagnosis, and did not violate prior antibiotic use criteria. Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.

Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=833 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=838 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
EOT · Clinical Cure
824 Participants
824 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
EOT · Clinical Failure
9 Participants
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
TOC · Clinical Cure
753 Participants
763 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
TOC · Clinical Failure
31 Participants
35 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
LFU · Clinical Cure
707 Participants
692 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE Population
LFU · Clinical Failure
64 Participants
74 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.

Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=428 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=466 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
EOT · Clinical Cure
426 Participants
462 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
EOT · Clinical Failure
2 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
TOC · Clinical Cure
396 Participants
442 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
TOC · Clinical Failure
14 Participants
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
LFU · Clinical Cure
371 Participants
399 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
LFU · Clinical Failure
35 Participants
40 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture.

Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of Baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline) ;Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC · Microbiologic Eradication
269 Participants
296 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC · Microbiologic Persistence
158 Participants
169 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC · Microbiologic Indeterminate
19 Participants
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Microbiologic Eradication
428 Participants
457 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Microbiologic Persistence
3 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT · Microbiologic Indeterminate
15 Participants
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Microbiologic Eradication
224 Participants
270 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Microbiologic Persistence
207 Participants
202 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU · Microbiologic Indeterminate
15 Participants
11 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.

Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline); Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=428 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=466 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
LFU · Microbiologic Persistence
193 Participants
188 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
EOT · Microbiologic Eradication
425 Participants
457 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
EOT · Microbiologic Persistence
3 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
TOC · Microbiologic Eradication
257 Participants
287 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
TOC · Microbiologic Persistence
153 Participants
165 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME Population
LFU · Microbiologic Eradication
213 Participants
251 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-Phenotype · Responder
156 Participants
175 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-Phenotype · Non-responder
1 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-Phenotype · Indeterminate
4 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Fluoroquinolone-not susceptible (FQ-NS) · Responder
190 Participants
199 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Fluoroquinolone-not susceptible (FQ-NS) · Non-responder
2 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Fluoroquinolone-not susceptible (FQ-NS) · Indeterminate
6 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant (TMP-SMX-R) · Responder
178 Participants
191 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant (TMP-SMX-R) · Non-responder
1 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
EOT: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant (TMP-SMX-R) · Indeterminate
3 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Responder
84 Participants
108 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Non-responder
71 Participants
76 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Indeterminate
6 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Responder
98 Participants
119 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Non-responder
92 Participants
85 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Indeterminate
8 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Responder
102 Participants
114 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Non-responder
75 Participants
81 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Indeterminate
5 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Responder
68 Participants
100 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Non-responder
90 Participants
88 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Indeterminate
3 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Responder
79 Participants
107 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Non-responder
115 Participants
101 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Indeterminate
4 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Responder
85 Participants
101 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Non-responder
96 Participants
98 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Indeterminate
1 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME Populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit and Enterobacterales.

Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=428 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=466 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Responder
156 Participants
175 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Non-Responder
1 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Responder
190 Participants
199 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Non-Responder
1 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Responder
177 Participants
191 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Non-Responder
0 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Responder
83 Participants
106 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Non-Responder
69 Participants
71 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Responder
96 Participants
117 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Non-Responder
90 Participants
82 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Responder
100 Participants
112 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Non-Responder
72 Participants
77 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Responder
66 Participants
94 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Non-Responder
85 Participants
78 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Responder
78 Participants
99 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Non-Responder
108 Participants
93 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Responder
83 Participants
94 Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Non-Responder
88 Participants
89 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and TOC timepoints only.

Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted); Failure, including clinical relapse (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI); or Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Clinical Indeterminate
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Cure
181 Participants
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Cure
160 Participants
185 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Failure
0 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Indeterminate
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Clinical Cure
196 Participants
206 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Clinical Failure
1 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Failure
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Indeterminate
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Cure
149 Participants
183 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Failure
9 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Indeterminate
3 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Clinical Cure
183 Participants
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Clinical Failure
11 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Clinical Indeterminate
4 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Cure
175 Participants
196 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Failure
6 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Indeterminate
1 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at the LFU timepoint only.

Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted); Failure, including clinical relapse (defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI); or Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Cure, Including Sustained Clinical Cure
143 Participants
175 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Failure, Including Clinical Relapse or Indeterminate
18 Participants
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Cure, Including Sustained Clinical Cure
173 Participants
191 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Failure, Including Clinical Relapse or Indeterminate
25 Participants
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Cure, Including Sustained Clinical Cure
166 Participants
189 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Failure, Including Clinical Relapse or Indeterminate
16 Participants
14 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28(LFU)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU).

Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure: Sustained clinical cure is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted; Failure, including clinical relapse: Clinical relapse is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI; Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=428 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=466 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Cure
157 Participants
176 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Failure
0 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Clinical Cure
191 Participants
200 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Clinical Failure
0 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Cure
177 Participants
194 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Failure
0 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Cure
143 Participants
176 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Failure
9 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Clinical Cure
176 Participants
197 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Clinical Failure
10 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Cure
167 Participants
188 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Failure
5 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Cure
137 Participants
164 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Clinical Failure
14 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Clinical Cure
167 Participants
179 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Clinical Failure
19 Participants
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Cure
158 Participants
173 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at the EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Clinical Failure
13 Participants
10 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and TOC timepoints only.

Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e.,microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT, participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Eradication
156 Participants
177 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Persistence
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Indeterminate
4 Participants
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Eradication
190 Participants
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Persistence
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Indeterminate
7 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Eradication
178 Participants
193 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Persistence
0 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Indeterminate
4 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Eradication
88 Participants
108 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Persistence
67 Participants
72 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Indeterminate
6 Participants
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Eradication
102 Participants
119 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Persistence
87 Participants
82 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Indeterminate
9 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Eradication
104 Participants
114 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Persistence
72 Participants
79 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Indeterminate
6 Participants
10 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at the LFU timepoint only.

Participants were evaluated for clinical response outcome based on assessment of signs and symptoms as: Cure, including sustained clinical cure: Sustained clinical cure is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, and remained free of new or recurrent signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU visit such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted; Failure, including clinical relapse: Clinical relapse is defined as met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at LFU visit and participant requires antibacterial therapy for cUTI; Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data are available to determine if participant is a sustained clinical cure or clinical relapse. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at EOT, participant is automatically considered a failure at TOC and LFU visits. If a participant is assessed as a clinical failure at TOC, participant is automatically considered a failure at LFU visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=446 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=483 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Eradication, Including Sustained Microbiologic Eradication
72 Participants
102 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Persistence, Including Microbiologic Recurrence or Indeterminate
89 Participants
88 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Eradication, Including Sustained Microbiologic Eradication
83 Participants
110 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Persistence, Including Microbiologic Recurrence or Indeterminate
115 Participants
100 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Eradication, Including Sustained Microbiologic Eradication
87 Participants
105 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Persistence, Including Microbiologic Recurrence or Indeterminate
95 Participants
98 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 10 (EOT) and Day 17 (TOC)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit and Enterobacterales. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and TOC timepoints only.

Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e.,microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT, participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=428 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=466 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Eradication
156 Participants
177 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Persistence
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Eradication
190 Participants
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Persistence
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Eradication
177 Participants
193 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
EOT: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Persistence
0 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Eradication
87 Participants
106 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: ESBL-Phenotype · Microbiologic Persistence
65 Participants
71 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Eradication
100 Participants
117 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: FQ-NS · Microbiologic Persistence
86 Participants
82 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Eradication
102 Participants
112 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the EOT and TOC Visits in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
TOC: TMP-SMX-R · Microbiologic Persistence
70 Participants
77 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Day 28 (LFU)

Population: The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU) Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit and Enterobacterales. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at the LFU timepoint only.

Participants will be evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as :Eradication, including sustained microbiologic eradication, i.e., microbiologic eradication at TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of original Baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^3 CFU/mL;Persistence, including microbiologic recurrence, i.e.,isolation from urine culture at ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or blood culture of any of Baseline uropathogen(s) at any time after documented eradication at TOC visit up to and including LFU visit; Microbiologic indeterminate:no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason. If a participant is assessed as a microbiological persistence at EOT,participant is automatically considered persistent at TOC and LFU. If assessed as persistent at TOC, participant is automatically considered a persistent at LFU.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=406 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=439 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Eradication, Including Sustained Microbiologic Eradication
70 Participants
96 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: ESBL-Phenotype · Persistence, Including Microbiologic Recurrence
81 Participants
76 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Eradication, Including Sustained Microbiologic Eradication
82 Participants
102 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: FQ-NS · Persistence, Including Microbiologic Recurrence
104 Participants
90 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Eradication, Including Sustained Microbiologic Eradication
85 Participants
98 Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response at the LFU Visit in Participants With Drug-resistant Enterobacterales in the ME Population
LFU: TMP-SMX-R · Persistence, Including Microbiologic Recurrence
86 Participants
85 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)

Population: Safety population includes randomized participants who received any amount of the study drug or comparator.

An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal investigational/experimental) product, whether or not related to this product. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose and regardless of causality that results in death, is life threatening, requires immediate or prolongation of hospitalization, results in significant disability, congenital anomaly and is a medically important reaction. TEAEs are defined as events that are newly occurring or worsening from the time of the first dose of IP through LFU.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=843 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=844 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events
TEAEs
235 Participants
201 Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events
Serious TEAEs
29 Participants
22 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0.25 hour (h), 0.5h, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 4h and 6h postdose at Day 2

Population: The pharmacokinetics population consists of all participants treated with at least one relevant dose of TBP-PI-HBr with at least one quantifiable plasma sample. The data is reported only for TBP-PI-HBr arm. Population PK analysis was performed with data from the PK population; data reported here was obtained in the subpopulation with intensive PK sampling.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=16 Participants
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=2 Participants
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
1.0-hour Post
4678 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 258
7374 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
1.5-hour Post
3933 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 147
6890 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
2-hour Post
2982 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 156
4042 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
4-hour Post
1247 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 144
2163 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
6-hour Post
654 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 234
1313 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
0.25-hour Post
3834 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 394
793 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 7341
Plasma Concentrations of TBP-PI-HBr
0.5-hour Post
3836 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 387
791 nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 7327

Adverse Events

TBP-PI-HBr

Serious events: 29 serious events
Other events: 68 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

Imipenem-cilastatin

Serious events: 22 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=843 participants at risk
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=844 participants at risk
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.24%
2/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.71%
6/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.36%
3/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.36%
3/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.24%
2/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
0.24%
2/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
General disorders
Death
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis salmonella
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Klebsiella urinary tract infection
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Renal abscess
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Stoma site infection
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Tracheobronchitis
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Tuberculosis bladder
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Investigations
Pregnancy test false positive
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal neoplasm
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Postmenopausal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.12%
1/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive urgency
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.12%
1/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
0.00%
0/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
TBP-PI-HBr
n=843 participants at risk
Participants received TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg, two x 300mg film-coated tablets, PO and a dummy infusion IV, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Participants with estimated baseline CrCl \>30 mL/min and ≤ 50 mL/min received TBP-PI-HBr 300 mg q6h.
Imipenem-cilastatin
n=844 participants at risk
Participants received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg, IV and matched dummy tablets, PO, q6h from Day 1 through Day 10. Dose adjustments for imipenem-cilastatin were made for participants with estimated baseline CrCl \< 90mL/min per approved imipenem-cilastatin package insert. Participants with baseline CrCl ≥ 60 to \< 90 mL/min were administered imipenem-cilastatin, 400 mg IV q6h and participants with baseline CrCl levels \>30 to \<60 mL/min, were administered 300mg IV, q6h.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
8.1%
68/843 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
2.7%
23/844 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to last follow-up visit (Day 28)
Safety analysis population includes randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.

Additional Information

David Hong

Senior Vice President Clinical Development

Phone: 857-242-1583

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee No publication related to study results will be published prior to publication of a multi-center report submitted for publication within 18 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all study sites. Results publications will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Sponsor can require removal of confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can embargo a proposed publication for another 45 days to preserve intellectual property
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER