Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Learn About the Tastes of Different Suspensions With the Study Medicine (PF-07923568) in Healthy Adult Participants. (NCT NCT06003829)
NCT ID: NCT06003829
Last Updated: 2024-11-13
Results Overview
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
12 participants
At 1 minute after tasting specified study formulation on Day 1
2024-11-13
Participant Flow
A total of 12 participants were enrolled in the study.
Participants received sisunatovir prepared in 5 different suspensions (formulation A, B, D, E and F) and bitrex (formulation C as comparator).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Formulation A Then B Then D Then C Then A Then E Then None Then F
Participants were randomized to receive formulation A then B then D and then C in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively, on Day 1 of the study. On Day 2 of the study participants received formulation A then E then no formulation and then formulation F in Period 5, 6, 7 and 8 respectively. A single dose of each formulation was administered. There was at least 60 minutes interval between each study formulation.
|
Formulation B Then C Then A Then D Then E Then F Then A Then None
Participants were randomized to receive formulation B then C then A and then D in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively, on Day 1 of the study. On Day 2 of the study participants received formulation E then F then A and then no formulation in Period 5, 6, 7 and 8 respectively. A single dose of each formulation was administered. There was at least 60 minutes interval between each study formulation.
|
Formulation C Then D Then B Then A Then F Then None Then E Then A
Participants were randomized to receive formulation C then D then B and then A in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively, on Day 1 of the study. On Day 2 of the study participants received formulation F then None then E and then A in Period 5, 6, 7 and 8 respectively. A single dose of each formulation was administered. There was at least 60 minutes interval between each study formulation.
|
Formulation D Then A Then C Then B Then None Then A Then F Then E
Participants were randomized to receive formulation D then A then C then B in Period 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively, on Day 1 of the study. On Day 2 of the study participants received no formulation then formulation A then F then E in Period 5, 6, 7 and 8 respectively. A single dose of each formulation was administered. There was at least 60 minutes interval between each study formulation.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Period 1 (Day 1 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 1 (Day 1 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 1 (Day 1 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 2 (Day 1 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 2 (Day 1 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 2 (Day 1 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 3 (Day 1 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 3 (Day 1 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 3 (Day 1 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 4 (Day 1 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 4 (Day 1 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 4 (Day 1 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 5 (Day 2 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 5 (Day 2 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 5 (Day 2 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 6 (Day 2 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 6 (Day 2 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 6 (Day 2 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 7 (Day 2 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 7 (Day 2 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 7 (Day 2 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 8 (Day 2 of the Study)
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 8 (Day 2 of the Study)
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Period 8 (Day 2 of the Study)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Learn About the Tastes of Different Suspensions With the Study Medicine (PF-07923568) in Healthy Adult Participants.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants
n=12 Participants
All participants who were enrolled and received study intervention in a randomized crossover manner at each period, up to 4 times a day on Day 1 or Day 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.95 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 1 minute after tasting specified study formulation on Day 1Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 1.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Sourness
|
32.8 Units on a scale
Interval 16.65 to 49.01
|
30.3 Units on a scale
Interval 17.85 to 42.82
|
50.1 Units on a scale
Interval 35.25 to 64.92
|
32.8 Units on a scale
Interval 23.49 to 42.18
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Saltiness
|
26.1 Units on a scale
Interval 13.18 to 38.99
|
30.8 Units on a scale
Interval 18.46 to 43.2
|
46.6 Units on a scale
Interval 30.18 to 62.99
|
28.0 Units on a scale
Interval 17.18 to 38.82
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
14.8 Units on a scale
Interval 6.03 to 23.63
|
18.3 Units on a scale
Interval 8.5 to 28.17
|
27.5 Units on a scale
Interval 13.3 to 41.7
|
21.3 Units on a scale
Interval 10.72 to 31.78
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Mouth Feel
|
54.0 Units on a scale
Interval 40.09 to 67.91
|
48.5 Units on a scale
Interval 37.47 to 59.53
|
80.3 Units on a scale
Interval 72.65 to 88.02
|
49.4 Units on a scale
Interval 40.69 to 58.15
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Bitterness
|
59.5 Units on a scale
Interval 47.1 to 71.9
|
49.4 Units on a scale
Interval 34.47 to 64.36
|
80.2 Units on a scale
Interval 73.91 to 86.43
|
49.8 Units on a scale
Interval 36.55 to 62.95
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Sweetness
|
16.3 Units on a scale
Interval 7.46 to 25.04
|
28.3 Units on a scale
Interval 16.59 to 40.08
|
25.8 Units on a scale
Interval 8.89 to 42.61
|
36.3 Units on a scale
Interval 26.57 to 45.93
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 1
Overall Liking
|
57.9 Units on a scale
Interval 45.23 to 70.6
|
50.4 Units on a scale
Interval 36.49 to 64.35
|
85.1 Units on a scale
Interval 76.58 to 93.59
|
55.6 Units on a scale
Interval 43.51 to 67.65
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 5 minutes after tasting specified study formulation on Day 1Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 1.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Bitterness
|
53.5 Units on a scale
Interval 42.36 to 64.64
|
53.2 Units on a scale
Interval 40.82 to 65.52
|
72.3 Units on a scale
Interval 61.87 to 82.63
|
45.9 Units on a scale
Interval 37.18 to 54.66
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Sweetness
|
18.3 Units on a scale
Interval 8.72 to 27.95
|
27.4 Units on a scale
Interval 14.88 to 39.95
|
22.7 Units on a scale
Interval 9.28 to 36.05
|
30.3 Units on a scale
Interval 18.94 to 41.56
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Mouth Feel
|
50.9 Units on a scale
Interval 39.47 to 62.36
|
46.7 Units on a scale
Interval 32.36 to 60.97
|
66.6 Units on a scale
Interval 56.85 to 76.31
|
45.8 Units on a scale
Interval 33.91 to 57.59
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Sourness
|
28.9 Units on a scale
Interval 15.76 to 42.08
|
27.7 Units on a scale
Interval 17.09 to 38.24
|
43.8 Units on a scale
Interval 28.95 to 58.71
|
30.3 Units on a scale
Interval 20.83 to 39.83
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Saltiness
|
24.9 Units on a scale
Interval 12.22 to 37.61
|
24.5 Units on a scale
Interval 12.84 to 36.16
|
34.5 Units on a scale
Interval 18.43 to 50.57
|
23.0 Units on a scale
Interval 13.24 to 32.76
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
17.1 Units on a scale
Interval 7.42 to 26.75
|
17.3 Units on a scale
Interval 7.37 to 27.13
|
23.3 Units on a scale
Interval 10.5 to 36.16
|
21.8 Units on a scale
Interval 11.07 to 32.6
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Overall Liking
|
52.3 Units on a scale
Interval 40.97 to 63.7
|
49.4 Units on a scale
Interval 34.27 to 64.56
|
78.3 Units on a scale
Interval 68.19 to 88.31
|
53.3 Units on a scale
Interval 38.59 to 68.07
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 10 minutes after tasting specified study formulation on Day 1Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 1.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Mouth Feel
|
40.3 Units on a scale
Interval 32.23 to 48.27
|
44.6 Units on a scale
Interval 29.45 to 59.71
|
62.6 Units on a scale
Interval 50.44 to 74.72
|
43.2 Units on a scale
Interval 31.29 to 55.04
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Sourness
|
24.6 Units on a scale
Interval 13.38 to 35.79
|
18.8 Units on a scale
Interval 9.5 to 28.0
|
42.8 Units on a scale
Interval 27.34 to 58.16
|
29.3 Units on a scale
Interval 18.51 to 40.15
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Bitterness
|
42.0 Units on a scale
Interval 34.5 to 49.5
|
52.7 Units on a scale
Interval 36.62 to 68.72
|
66.2 Units on a scale
Interval 52.84 to 79.49
|
48.0 Units on a scale
Interval 39.71 to 56.29
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Sweetness
|
16.3 Units on a scale
Interval 7.09 to 25.41
|
23.9 Units on a scale
Interval 9.52 to 38.32
|
23.3 Units on a scale
Interval 8.96 to 37.71
|
25.8 Units on a scale
Interval 13.87 to 37.63
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Saltiness
|
21.1 Units on a scale
Interval 9.12 to 33.04
|
22.1 Units on a scale
Interval 11.27 to 32.89
|
34.6 Units on a scale
Interval 18.98 to 50.19
|
22.3 Units on a scale
Interval 11.42 to 33.24
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
15.8 Units on a scale
Interval 6.09 to 25.57
|
16.0 Units on a scale
Interval 5.18 to 26.82
|
23.4 Units on a scale
Interval 11.2 to 35.63
|
18.8 Units on a scale
Interval 8.54 to 28.96
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Overall Liking
|
42.5 Units on a scale
Interval 32.88 to 52.12
|
51.0 Units on a scale
Interval 34.37 to 67.63
|
70.7 Units on a scale
Interval 56.77 to 84.57
|
53.2 Units on a scale
Interval 40.38 to 65.96
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 20 minutes after tasting specified study formulation on Day 1Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 1.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Bitterness
|
24.0 Units on a scale
Interval 15.55 to 32.45
|
47.8 Units on a scale
Interval 31.64 to 64.03
|
62.7 Units on a scale
Interval 48.64 to 76.69
|
46.0 Units on a scale
Interval 35.17 to 56.83
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Sweetness
|
16.5 Units on a scale
Interval 8.2 to 24.8
|
22.0 Units on a scale
Interval 8.62 to 35.38
|
19.1 Units on a scale
Interval 7.53 to 30.64
|
26.6 Units on a scale
Interval 14.9 to 38.26
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Saltiness
|
18.8 Units on a scale
Interval 8.48 to 29.19
|
21.3 Units on a scale
Interval 9.04 to 33.63
|
33.8 Units on a scale
Interval 18.87 to 48.8
|
18.9 Units on a scale
Interval 9.03 to 28.8
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
14.8 Units on a scale
Interval 5.59 to 24.08
|
13.5 Units on a scale
Interval 4.11 to 22.89
|
23.5 Units on a scale
Interval 10.16 to 36.84
|
16.8 Units on a scale
Interval 7.33 to 26.17
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Overall Liking
|
34.7 Units on a scale
Interval 25.77 to 43.57
|
46.8 Units on a scale
Interval 29.96 to 63.71
|
69.4 Units on a scale
Interval 53.71 to 85.12
|
49.4 Units on a scale
Interval 36.99 to 61.85
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Mouth Feel
|
29.8 Units on a scale
Interval 20.42 to 39.08
|
44.5 Units on a scale
Interval 28.5 to 60.5
|
58.3 Units on a scale
Interval 45.28 to 71.39
|
41.5 Units on a scale
Interval 28.32 to 54.68
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 1
Sourness
|
19.5 Units on a scale
Interval 8.98 to 30.02
|
26.3 Units on a scale
Interval 11.96 to 40.54
|
40.4 Units on a scale
Interval 25.64 to 55.19
|
26.3 Units on a scale
Interval 14.97 to 37.7
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 1 minute after tasting specified study formulation on Day 2Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 2.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Bitterness
|
48.3 Units on a scale
Interval 35.96 to 60.54
|
—
|
61.8 Units on a scale
Interval 50.27 to 73.23
|
43.4 Units on a scale
Interval 33.09 to 53.74
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Sweetness
|
38.3 Units on a scale
Interval 25.68 to 50.82
|
—
|
24.8 Units on a scale
Interval 14.14 to 35.53
|
39.3 Units on a scale
Interval 29.25 to 49.25
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Saltiness
|
28.0 Units on a scale
Interval 16.41 to 39.59
|
—
|
41.2 Units on a scale
Interval 27.39 to 54.94
|
21.9 Units on a scale
Interval 11.17 to 32.67
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
20.1 Units on a scale
Interval 8.96 to 31.21
|
—
|
22.8 Units on a scale
Interval 10.79 to 34.88
|
20.2 Units on a scale
Interval 8.8 to 31.54
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Mouth Feel
|
46.7 Units on a scale
Interval 31.54 to 61.79
|
—
|
61.6 Units on a scale
Interval 49.91 to 73.25
|
39.8 Units on a scale
Interval 29.68 to 49.99
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Sourness
|
28.8 Units on a scale
Interval 16.81 to 40.86
|
—
|
36.7 Units on a scale
Interval 25.23 to 48.11
|
27.0 Units on a scale
Interval 15.86 to 38.14
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 1 Minute Post-dose on Day 2
Overall Liking
|
48.3 Units on a scale
Interval 32.68 to 63.99
|
—
|
68.3 Units on a scale
Interval 56.89 to 79.61
|
42.7 Units on a scale
Interval 31.95 to 53.38
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 5 minutes after tasting specified study formulation on Day 2Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 2.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Saltiness
|
22.7 Units on a scale
Interval 10.99 to 34.35
|
—
|
33.6 Units on a scale
Interval 19.72 to 47.44
|
22.3 Units on a scale
Interval 11.4 to 33.1
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Mouth Feel
|
42.3 Units on a scale
Interval 27.08 to 57.42
|
—
|
53.3 Units on a scale
Interval 41.57 to 65.09
|
38.4 Units on a scale
Interval 24.1 to 52.74
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Bitterness
|
48.7 Units on a scale
Interval 34.5 to 62.83
|
—
|
61.2 Units on a scale
Interval 51.02 to 71.32
|
46.7 Units on a scale
Interval 31.81 to 61.52
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Sweetness
|
32.8 Units on a scale
Interval 20.13 to 45.37
|
—
|
21.7 Units on a scale
Interval 10.87 to 32.47
|
29.5 Units on a scale
Interval 17.59 to 41.41
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Sourness
|
26.9 Units on a scale
Interval 17.27 to 36.56
|
—
|
41.0 Units on a scale
Interval 30.06 to 51.94
|
26.8 Units on a scale
Interval 17.45 to 36.21
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
19.7 Units on a scale
Interval 8.81 to 30.52
|
—
|
20.3 Units on a scale
Interval 8.84 to 31.66
|
19.6 Units on a scale
Interval 8.36 to 30.8
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 5 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Overall Liking
|
44.3 Units on a scale
Interval 28.48 to 60.18
|
—
|
62.5 Units on a scale
Interval 50.35 to 74.65
|
43.0 Units on a scale
Interval 27.13 to 58.87
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 10 minutes after tasting specified study formulation on Day 2Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 2.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Sweetness
|
31.3 Units on a scale
Interval 18.64 to 44.03
|
—
|
20.1 Units on a scale
Interval 8.97 to 31.2
|
27.5 Units on a scale
Interval 14.74 to 40.26
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Sourness
|
22.8 Units on a scale
Interval 12.36 to 33.3
|
—
|
39.7 Units on a scale
Interval 27.79 to 51.54
|
29.3 Units on a scale
Interval 19.41 to 39.09
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Mouth Feel
|
38.2 Units on a scale
Interval 24.25 to 52.08
|
—
|
52.5 Units on a scale
Interval 40.28 to 64.72
|
39.0 Units on a scale
Interval 24.59 to 53.41
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Bitterness
|
42.7 Units on a scale
Interval 30.51 to 54.83
|
—
|
56.9 Units on a scale
Interval 44.66 to 69.17
|
45.1 Units on a scale
Interval 31.67 to 58.5
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Saltiness
|
20.5 Units on a scale
Interval 9.38 to 31.62
|
—
|
31.5 Units on a scale
Interval 18.02 to 44.98
|
20.4 Units on a scale
Interval 9.51 to 31.32
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
19.0 Units on a scale
Interval 8.16 to 29.84
|
—
|
20.8 Units on a scale
Interval 8.76 to 32.74
|
18.8 Units on a scale
Interval 7.92 to 29.58
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 10 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Overall Liking
|
42.9 Units on a scale
Interval 26.72 to 59.11
|
—
|
59.3 Units on a scale
Interval 45.12 to 73.38
|
43.2 Units on a scale
Interval 27.24 to 59.1
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 20 minutes after tasting specified study formulation on Day 2Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Data was reported only for those formulations which were administered on Day 2.
Participants were offered formulation for tasting where they had to swirl sample in their mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out. Participant had to assess each sensory attribute on scale of 0 (good) to 100 (bad) after tasting formulation, lower score= better palatability. Following were sensory attributes: mouth feel (grittiness/stickiness or waxiness, 0= normal mouth feel,100=bad mouth feel);bitterness (degree of bitterness of the product, 0= not bitter at all,100= extremely bitter); sweetness(degree of sweet taste,0=sweet, 100= not sweet at all); sourness (degree of sour taste,0= not sour at all,100= extremely sour);saltiness(degree of salty taste,0=not salty at all,100= extremely salty); tongue/mouth burn(degree of tongue/mouth burn,0= no burn at all,100= extreme burn);overall liking (how much like or dislike product, 0= like, 100= dislike).Mean score for each sensory attributes based on palatability assessment questionnaire are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Sourness
|
23.3 Units on a scale
Interval 12.91 to 33.75
|
—
|
39.8 Units on a scale
Interval 27.45 to 52.05
|
25.3 Units on a scale
Interval 16.37 to 34.13
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Overall Liking
|
38.3 Units on a scale
Interval 21.04 to 55.62
|
—
|
58.4 Units on a scale
Interval 43.08 to 73.76
|
42.1 Units on a scale
Interval 25.84 to 58.33
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Mouth Feel
|
37.1 Units on a scale
Interval 21.61 to 52.55
|
—
|
48.9 Units on a scale
Interval 36.89 to 60.94
|
35.6 Units on a scale
Interval 21.51 to 49.65
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Bitterness
|
43.0 Units on a scale
Interval 29.76 to 56.24
|
—
|
54.2 Units on a scale
Interval 41.67 to 66.67
|
40.8 Units on a scale
Interval 27.43 to 54.24
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Sweetness
|
27.4 Units on a scale
Interval 14.9 to 39.94
|
—
|
19.2 Units on a scale
Interval 8.3 to 30.03
|
26.2 Units on a scale
Interval 12.8 to 39.53
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Saltiness
|
20.1 Units on a scale
Interval 9.73 to 30.43
|
—
|
32.0 Units on a scale
Interval 18.83 to 45.17
|
20.2 Units on a scale
Interval 9.36 to 30.97
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Score of Sensory Attributes Based on Palatability Assessment Questionnaire at 20 Minutes Post-dose on Day 2
Tongue/Mouth Burn
|
18.1 Units on a scale
Interval 7.56 to 28.61
|
—
|
19.6 Units on a scale
Interval 8.17 to 31.0
|
17.6 Units on a scale
Interval 7.08 to 28.08
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAE was an AE that occurred after initiation of study intervention (formulation) that was not present at the time of treatment start up to 35 days after administration of last study intervention (formulation).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 day prior to first formulation (Day -1) up to last formulation on Day 2 (up to 3 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
Laboratory analysis included were: hematology, chemistry and urinalysis. Clinically significance in laboratory abnormalities were judged by investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 of receiving formulation up to last formulation on Day 2 (up to 2 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
Vital signs included blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and pulse rate. Clinically significance in vital sign abnormalities were judged by investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Formulation C
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation A
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
n=12 Participants
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Formulation A
Formulation B
Formulation C
Formulation D
Formulation E
Formulation F
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Formulation A
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of formulation A of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation B
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of formulation B of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation C
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of bitrex. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation D
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of formulation D of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation E
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of formulation E of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
Formulation F
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of formulation F of sisunatovir. Participants had to swirl the formulation in the mouth for approximately 10 seconds, and then spit it out.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous ulcer
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
8.3%
1/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip dry
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
8.3%
1/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
8.3%
1/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
8.3%
1/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
0.00%
0/12 • Day 1 of receiving formulation up to 35 days after last formulation of the study (up to 37 days)
Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER