Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness and Safety of Lebrikizumab Treatment in Adults and Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis (NCT NCT05990725)

NCT ID: NCT05990725

Last Updated: 2026-07-17

Results Overview

The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; it is a composite index with total score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and extensive disease. The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification will be assessed by the Investigator or trained designee on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. In addition, the extent of AD involvement in each of the 4 body areas will be assessed as a percentage by body area of head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 (0%), 1 (0 to 9%), 2 (10 to 29%), 3 (30 to 49%), 4 (50 to 69%), 5 (70 to 89%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Percentage of participants who achieved EASI total \<= 7 at Week 24 was reported.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

260 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At Week 24

Results posted on

2026-07-17

Participant Flow

The study was conducted at 41 sites in Germany, Netherlands and the United Kingdom from 20 November 2023 to 25 June 2025.

A total of 260 participants were enrolled in this study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Lebrikizumab
Participants received a loading dose of lebrikizumab 500 milligrams (mg), subcutaneously (SC) (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), every two weeks (Q2W) from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to every 4 weeks (Q4W) and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Overall Study
STARTED
260
Overall Study
Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)
247
Overall Study
COMPLETED
243
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
17

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Lebrikizumab
Participants received a loading dose of lebrikizumab 500 milligrams (mg), subcutaneously (SC) (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), every two weeks (Q2W) from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to every 4 weeks (Q4W) and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
5
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
2
Overall Study
Protocol Deviation
4
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
5

Baseline Characteristics

Effectiveness and Safety of Lebrikizumab Treatment in Adults and Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=260 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Age, Continuous
32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.10 • n=20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
106 Participants
n=20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
154 Participants
n=20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
239 Participants
n=20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
230 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
11 Participants
n=20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
8 participants
n=20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
34 participants
n=20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
218 participants
n=20 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At Week 24

Population: The modified analysis set (mFAS) included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site.

The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; it is a composite index with total score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and extensive disease. The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification will be assessed by the Investigator or trained designee on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. In addition, the extent of AD involvement in each of the 4 body areas will be assessed as a percentage by body area of head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 (0%), 1 (0 to 9%), 2 (10 to 29%), 3 (30 to 49%), 4 (50 to 69%), 5 (70 to 89%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Percentage of participants who achieved EASI total \<= 7 at Week 24 was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=247 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7 at Week 24
74.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 69.2 to 80.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16, and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site.

The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; it is a composite index with total score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and extensive disease. The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification will be assessed by the Investigator or trained designee on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. In addition, the extent of AD involvement in each of the 4 body areas will be assessed as a percentage by body area of head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 (0%), 1 (0 to 9%), 2 (10 to 29%), 3 (30 to 49%), 4 (50 to 69%), 5 (70 to 89%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Percentage of participants who achieved EASI Total Score \<=7, EASI \<=5, and EASI \<=3 at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=247 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=3: At Week 2
3.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 5.4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=7: At Week 2
13.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.1 to 17.6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=7: At Week 4
35.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.9 to 41.9
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=7: At Week 16
70.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 64.7 to 76.4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=5: At Week 2
8.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=5: At Week 4
22.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.6 to 28.1
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=5: At Week 16
55.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 48.7 to 61.4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=5: At Week 24
63.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 56.8 to 69.1
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=3: At Week 4
11.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.4 to 15.4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=3: At Week 16
33.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.8 to 39.6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI Total Score <=7, EASI <=5, and EASI <=3 by Visit
EASI Total Score <=3: At Week 24
43.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.4 to 50.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site.

The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; it is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease. EASI 75 is defined as 75% reduction from baseline in the EASI score. EASI 90 is defined as 90% reduction from baseline in the EASI score. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=247 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 75: At Week 2
7.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.4 to 11.1
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 75: At Week 4
21.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.2 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 75: At Week 16
58.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 52.4 to 65.0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 75: At Week 24
63.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 57.4 to 69.7
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 90: At Week 2
1.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 90: At Week 4
5.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 8.1
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 90: At Week 16
23.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.8 to 28.4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 and EASI 90 by Visit
EASI 90: At Week 24
34.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.1 to 40.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site.

The IGA is an instrument used to globally rate the severity of the participant's AD. It is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) and 4 (severe), and a score is selected using descriptors that best describe the overall appearance of the lesions at a given time point. The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting (minimal, palpable induration and significant induration). Percentage of participants with an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a reduction \>=2 points from baseline at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=247 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points From Baseline by Visit
At Week 2
4.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.2 to 7.5
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points From Baseline by Visit
At Week 4
11.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 14.9
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points From Baseline by Visit
At Week 16
32.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.3 to 38.2
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points From Baseline by Visit
At Week 24
41.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.1 to 47.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Week 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

SCORAD is a validated clinical tool for assessing the extent and intensity of AD. There are 3 components: surface involvement, intensity part and subjective assessment. Surface involvement is assessed as proportion of involved surface area segment by segment by applying the rule of 9s. Intensity part of the SCORAD consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, and dryness. Each item is graded as follows: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) (for a maximum of 18 total points). Subjective assessment of itch and of sleeplessness is recorded for each symptom using a VAS, where 0 is no itch (or sleeplessness) and 10 is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness), for maximum possible score of 20. The score ranges from 0 to 103, with higher values indicating a more extensive and/or severe condition. SCORAD 75 is defined as 75% reduction in SCORAD from baseline. SCORAD 90 is defined as 90% reduction in SCORAD from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=216 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 75: At Week 2
0.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.5
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 75: At Week 4
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.2
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 75: At Week 16
9.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 13.6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 75: At Week 24
20.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.8 to 27.0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 90: At Week 2
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 90: At Week 4
0.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.7
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 90: At Week 16
0.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.5
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) 75 and SCORAD 90 by Visit
SCORAD 90: At Week 24
3.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 6.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 16, and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" signifies participants who at specific timepoints.

mTLSS combines an evaluation of hand eczema lesions severity including 6 key signs (erythema, desquamation, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculae, oedema, fissures) and the intensity of pruritus and pain. The seven features of AD of the hands (erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, oedema, fissures, pruritus/pain) form the composite scale of mTLSS' strength and each one of them scores from (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The scores are summed, extending from a base estimation of 0 (no signs or symptoms) to the most extreme of 21 (more serious disease). Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: (\[Observed or imputed value at post-baseline time point (i.e. Visit) - Observed value at Baseline\]/Observed value at Baseline) \*100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=158 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) (Hands) From Baseline by Visit
Baseline
9.7 Percentage change
Standard Error 0.32
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) (Hands) From Baseline by Visit
Percent change at Week 2
-20.6 Percentage change
Standard Error 3.16
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) (Hands) From Baseline by Visit
Percent change at Week 4
-37.9 Percentage change
Standard Error 2.78
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) (Hands) From Baseline by Visit
Percent change at Week 16
-62.1 Percentage change
Standard Error 3.02
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) (Hands) From Baseline by Visit
Percent change at Week 24
-66.3 Percentage change
Standard Error 2.86

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity score over the past 24 hours, with 0 (No itch) to 10 (Worst itch imaginable). Assessments will be recorded by the participant using an eDiary. Percentage of participants with pruritus NRS \>=4 at baseline who achieved \>=4-Point improvement in pruritus NRS from baseline at each visit was reported

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=228 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in Pruritus NRS From Baseline by Visit
At Week 2
6.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.9 to 9.1
Percentage of Participants With Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in Pruritus NRS From Baseline by Visit
At Week 4
22.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.8 to 27.9
Percentage of Participants With Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in Pruritus NRS From Baseline by Visit
At Week 16
50.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 43.5 to 58.3
Percentage of Participants With Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in Pruritus NRS From Baseline by Visit
At Week 24
47.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.0 to 54.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire completed by the participant or caregiver used to assess the impact of skin disease on the participant's QoL during the previous week. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment. Each question is scored from 0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=a lot, and 3=very much, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QoL. DLQI scores indicates 0-1 (no effect on patient's life), 2-5 (small effect on patient's life), 6-10 (moderate effect on patient's life), 11-20 (very large effect on patient's life), 21-30 (extremely large effect on patient's life). Percentage of participants who achieved DLQI 0-1 at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=232 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0-1 by Visit
DLQI 0 or 1 at Week 2
4.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.7 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0-1 by Visit
DLQI 0 or 1 at Week 4
12.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.8 to 16.4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0-1 by Visit
DLQI 0 or 1 at Week 16
29.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.9 to 36.0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0-1 by Visit
DLQI 0 or 1 at Week 24
21.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.7 to 27.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire completed by the participant or caregiver used to assess the impact of skin disease on the participant's QoL during the previous week. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment. Each question is scored from 0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=a lot, and 3=very much, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. High score is indicative of a poor QoL. Percentage of participants with DLQI \>=4 at Baseline who achieved \>=4-Point improvement in DLQI from baseline at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=191 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With DLQI >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 2
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 48.4 to 62.8
Percentage of Participants With DLQI >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 4
73.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 66.4 to 79.5
Percentage of Participants With DLQI >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 16
84.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 79.1 to 90.5
Percentage of Participants With DLQI >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 24
81.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 75.2 to 87.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

cDLQI is validated from adolescents younger than age of 16 years, which is based on a set of 10 questions different from those of the DLQI. The answers to the questions are generally scored on a 4-point scale from 0=not at all or question unanswered, 1=only a little, 2=quite a lot, 3=very much. cDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in 0 to 30. Higher the score, the more impairment of the child's life is experienced. Percentage of participants who achieved cDLQI 0-1 at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=12 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) 0-1 by Visit
cDLQI 0 or 1 at Week 4
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 20.2
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) 0-1 by Visit
cDLQI 0 or 1 at Week 16
11.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 30.3
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) 0-1 by Visit
cDLQI 0 or 1 at Week 2
0.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) 0-1 by Visit
cDLQI 0 or 1 at Week 24
30.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.5 to 57.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Week 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

cDLQI is validated from adolescents younger than age of 16 years, which is based on a set of 10 questions different from those of the DLQI. The answers to the questions are generally scored on a 4-point scale from 0=not at all or question unanswered, 1=only a little, 2=quite a lot, 3=very much. cDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in 0 to 30. Higher the score, the more impairment of the child's life is experienced. Percentage of participants with cDLQI \>=6 at baseline who achieved \>=6-Point improvement in cDLQI from baseline at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=9 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With cDLQI >=6 at Baseline Who Achieved >=6-Point Improvement in cDLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 2
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 76.9
Percentage of Participants With cDLQI >=6 at Baseline Who Achieved >=6-Point Improvement in cDLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 4
64.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.3 to 96.7
Percentage of Participants With cDLQI >=6 at Baseline Who Achieved >=6-Point Improvement in cDLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 16
52.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.4 to 86.5
Percentage of Participants With cDLQI >=6 at Baseline Who Achieved >=6-Point Improvement in cDLQI From Baseline by Visit
At Week 24
66.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.0 to 97.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Sleep loss will be assessed by all participants using a patient-related outcome (PRO) instrument. Participants (and if applicable, with help of parents/caregiver if required) will rate their sleep on a 5-point Likert scale (with scores ranging from 0 \[not at all\] to 4 \[unable to sleep at all\]). Assessments will be recorded by the participant using an eDiary.The baseline Sleep-Loss Scale score will be determined based on the average of daily Sleep-Loss Scale scores during the 7 days immediately before the Day 1 or Baseline visit. Percentage of participants with a Sleep-Loss scale of \>=2 points at baseline who achieved at least 2-point reduction from baseline at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=110 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With a Sleep-Loss Scale of >=2 Points at Baseline Who Achieved at Least 2-point Reduction From Baseline by Visit
At Week 2
2.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With a Sleep-Loss Scale of >=2 Points at Baseline Who Achieved at Least 2-point Reduction From Baseline by Visit
At Week 4
26.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.6 to 34.5
Percentage of Participants With a Sleep-Loss Scale of >=2 Points at Baseline Who Achieved at Least 2-point Reduction From Baseline by Visit
At Week 16
33.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.9 to 43.8
Percentage of Participants With a Sleep-Loss Scale of >=2 Points at Baseline Who Achieved at Least 2-point Reduction From Baseline by Visit
At Week 24
36.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.8 to 45.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Weeks 2, 4, 16 and 24

Population: The mFAS included all participants from the FAS, excluding those enrolled in one study site. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire completed by the participant (and, if applicable, with help of parents/caregiver if required) to assess disease symptoms. Participants are asked to respond to questions on skin dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping. All answers carry equal weight, with a total possible score ranging from 0 to 28 (answers scored as: No days = 0; 1-2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5-6 days = 3; every day = 4. A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life. POEM responses are captured weekly using an eDiary. Percentage of participants with POEM \>=4 at baseline who achieved \>=4-Point improvement in POEM from baseline at each visit was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=207 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in POEM From Baseline by Visit
At Week 2
46.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 39.0 to 53.3
Percentage of Participants With Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in POEM From Baseline by Visit
At Week 4
79.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 74.0 to 85.6
Percentage of Participants With Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in POEM From Baseline by Visit
At Week 16
89.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 85.1 to 94.3
Percentage of Participants With Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) >=4 at Baseline Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement in POEM From Baseline by Visit
At Week 24
87.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 82.5 to 93.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)

Population: The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.

TEAEs are undesirable events that first occurred or worsened in severity after the date of first IMP injection in the study, and on or prior to the date of the last visit within the treatment period. An SAE are AE, which falls into any of the following categories: death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalisation or prolongs existing hospitalisation, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or any other medically important event that may jeopardise the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other above outcomes. Related TEAEs includes events considered related or possibly related to study treatment by the Investigator. The following treatment-emergent AEs are being designated as AESIs: conjunctivitis, herpes simplex or zoster infection and parasitic infections.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=260 Participants
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
Participants with at least one TEAE
204 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
Participants with at least one SAE
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
Participants with at least one related TEAE
131 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
Participants with at least one TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Study Treatment Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs)
Participants with at least one TEAESI
70 Participants

Adverse Events

Lebrikizumab

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 127 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=260 participants at risk
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythrodermic atopic dermatitis
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve prolapse
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
General disorders
Chest discomfort
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal skin infection
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Endometriosis
0.38%
1/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Lebrikizumab
n=260 participants at risk
Participants received loading doses of lebrikizumab 500 mg, SC (2 injections) at Day 1 and Week 2 followed by lebrikizumab 250 mg (1 injection), Q2W from Week 4 to Week 16. At Week 16, the dosing frequency was reduced to Q4W and received lebrikizumab 250 mg SC (1 injection) for up to Week 24.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
25.4%
66/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
17.7%
46/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
11.5%
30/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Eye disorders
Dry eye
6.9%
18/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
7.3%
19/260 • Baseline up to follow-up (Week 28)
The SAF included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment.

Additional Information

Head of Global Clinical Development

Almirall S.A

Phone: +34932913000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place