MedTrace Logo

Efficacy of Static Progressive Stretch Versus Traditional Stretch in Adhesive Capsulitis

NCT05988255 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 45

Last updated 2025-02-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of static progressive stretching using the joint active system (JAS) shoulder device with cyclic manual stretching and controls on shoulder range of motion (ROM), time to gain ROM, and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. The study includes three groups. Group A (15 patients) will receive static progressive stretch using the JAS device. Group B (15 patients) will receive cyclic manual stretching in flexion, abduction, and external and internal rotations. Group C (15 patients) is a control group that will receive no treatment until the end of the study.

Conditions

  • Adhesive Capsulitis
  • Stretch
  • Physical Neglect

Interventions

DEVICE

Static progressive stretching

A stretching technique applies a mechanical progressive stretch

OTHER

Cyclic manual stretching

A stretching technique applies an intermittent manual stretch

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-09-01
Primary Completion
2024-03-01
Completion
2024-04-05

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05988255 on ClinicalTrials.gov