Trial Outcomes & Findings for Sleep Chatbot Intervention for Emerging Black/African American Adults (NCT NCT05956886)
NCT ID: NCT05956886
Last Updated: 2026-07-31
Results Overview
The total amount of sleep time (hours) was estimated each night for seven consecutive days using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link. The average sleep time over a week were used in data analysis.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
End of intervention (at week 4)
2026-07-31
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited across the campuses of the University of Delaware (UD) and Delaware State University (DSU). After IRB approval, three strategies were used to enhance enrollment: (1) Flyers were placed on approved university bulletin boards, (2) Web advertisements were posted on university websites and registered student organizations, (3) Research staff participated in undergraduate student events at UD and DSU to offer information about the study.
There were no significant events that occurred between the enrollment and assignment of participants to an arm or group.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
Using CBT-I principles, enrolled participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Primary endpoint
STARTED
|
26
|
|
Primary endpoint
COMPLETED
|
23
|
|
Primary endpoint
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
|
Secondary endpoint: 4-week follow-up
STARTED
|
23
|
|
Secondary endpoint: 4-week follow-up
COMPLETED
|
17
|
|
Secondary endpoint: 4-week follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
Using CBT-I principles, enrolled participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Primary endpoint
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
|
Secondary endpoint: 4-week follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
Baseline Characteristics
Sleep Chatbot Intervention for Emerging Black/African American Adults
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=26 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
19.91 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
18 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
26 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
25 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Total sleep time
|
5.92 hours/night
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Sleep efficiency
|
81.40 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.14 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Intra-individual variability in midsleep times
|
1.28 Hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.69 • n=9 Participants
|
|
PSQI total score
|
8.69 point
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.84 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Sleep self-efficacy
|
25.65 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.19 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Insomnia severity
|
12.65 point
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.79 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Metabolic health
|
1.42 number of abnormal metabolic components
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94 • n=9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Results were report as # of participants reporting Acceptable and Completely acceptable. Acceptability question: "Overall, how acceptable was the sleep chat bot intervention to you? (Completely unacceptable; Unacceptable; No opinion; Acceptable; Completely acceptable)."
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Acceptability
|
23 number of participant
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (week 4) and one-month follow-up (week 8)Population: Core module completion rate were calculated as the complete among those who received intervention plan (n=23). Among all enrolled (n=26), three withdrew before intervention began and after baseline assessment.
Percentage of enrolled participants completed the intervention, completed end-of-intervention assessment, and completed one-month follow-up assessment; among those who received intervention modules (that is, excluding those who withdrew before intervention began), the rate of core module completion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=26 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Retention Rate
Intervention module completion rate among enrolled participants (percentage of participants, week 4)
|
88.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Retention Rate
Core module completion rate among those received intervention plan (week 4)
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
|
Retention Rate
Retention rate at end-of-intervention assessment time point (percentage of participants, week 4)
|
88.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Retention Rate
Retention rate at one-month follow-up assessment (percentage of participants, , week 8)
|
65 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Population: A total of 23 participants entered intervention phase, all completed intervention and provided self-report sleep data, and 20 offered valid Actigraph sleep data post-intervention.
The Insomnia Severity Index is composed of 7 items measuring insomnia-related sleep disturbance and daytime dysfunction. The seven answers are added up to get a total score (0-28), with higher scores indicating severer insomnia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Insomnia Severity
|
8.35 Point
Standard Deviation 3.84
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Population: A total of 23 participants entered intervention phase, all completed intervention and provided self-report sleep data, and 20 offered valid Actigraph sleep data post-intervention.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a widely-used, self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month period.The scores from all seven components are summed to yield a single Global PSQI Score, ranging from 0 to 21. Greater scores mean worse sleep.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
PSQI
|
6.22 point
Standard Error 3.10
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Population: A total of 23 participants entered intervention phase, all completed intervention and provided self-report sleep data, and 20 offered valid Actigraph sleep data post-intervention.
The total amount of sleep time (hours) was estimated each night for seven consecutive days using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link. The average sleep time over a week were used in data analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Total Sleep Time
|
6.26 hours/night
Standard Error .93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Population: A total of 23 participants entered intervention phase, all completed intervention and provided self-report sleep data, and 20 offered valid Actigraph sleep data post-intervention.
Sleep efficiency (percentage of time spent asleep while in bed) were estimated each night for seven consecutive days using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link. The average sleep efficiency over a week were used in data analysis. This variable indicates sleep quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Sleep Efficiency
|
86.06 % of time in bed actually asleep
Standard Deviation 4.55
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Population: A total of 23 participants entered intervention phase, all completed intervention and provided self-report sleep data, and 20 offered valid Actigraph sleep data post-intervention.
Sleep time and awakening time were estimated for seven consecutive days using a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link. Mid-sleep time each night refers to the mid-point between sleep time and awakening time. Intra-individual variability in midsleep times were calculated as the standard deviation of the mid-sleep time over a week for each participant. This variable reflects the regularity of sleep, with higher values showing greater irregularity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=20 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Intra-individual Variability in Midsleep Times
|
1.17 Hour
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Population: A total of 23 participants entered intervention phase, all completed intervention and provided self-report sleep data, and 20 offered valid Actigraph sleep data post-intervention.
The Sleep Self-Efficacy Scale, a 9-item scale assessing participants' beliefs in their ability to engage in productive sleep behaviors, measured sleep-related self efficacy. Each item was scored on a standard Likert scale from 1 (Not confident at all) to 5 (Very confident).The total scores ranged from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater sleep self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Sleep Self Efficacy
|
29.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of intervention (at week 4)Composite metabolic health was calculated by the total number of metabolic syndrome components, including high BMI, high blood pressure, high fasting triglycerides and glucose, and low HDL, were calculated to indicate metabolic health (higher value, worse metabolic health). A point-of-care test provided the fasting glucose and cholesterol panel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
n=19 Participants
Using CBT-I principles, participants received a four-week intervention delivered through a chatbot. The self-administered intervention comprises personalized behavioral prescriptions based on stimulus control principles and sleep schedule modification goals using sleep efficiency (SE) criteria. Participants were allowed to self-adjust expectations and make realistic decisions on sleep schedules. The chatbot facilitated sleep goal setting with the participant, communicated weekly behavioral prescriptions and CBT-I educational modules, collected sleep diary, and provided adaptive feedback and reactive services (e.g., Q\&A conversations) 24/7.
|
|---|---|
|
Composite Metabolic Health
|
1.63 number of abnormal metabolic components
Standard Deviation .25
|
Adverse Events
Sleep Chatbot Intervention Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place