MedTrace Logo

The Effects of Two Different Treatment Protocols on Shoulder Function, Quality of Life, and Ultrasound Parameters in Patients With Frozen Shoulder

NCT05956171 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2023-10-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this interventional study is to compare the outcomes of two different injection aprroaches in patients with frozen shoulder. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is hydrodilatation better than intraarticular corticosteroid injection?
* Is there any prognostic factors that will help clinicians guide their decision making when choosing between these two treatments?

Participans will receive an injection(cortcosteroid and local anesthetics alone or with hydrodilatation-corticosteroid and local anesthetics plus sterile saline solution) and then they will follow a rehabilitation program.

Conditions

  • Frozen Shoulder
  • Shoulder Capsulitis
  • Shoulder Pain

Interventions

OTHER

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection

5 ml blind intra-articular corticosteroid injection

OTHER

Ultrasound Guided Hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection

15 ml intra-articular injection to shoulder via anterior approach under ultrasound guidance

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Istanbul University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-01
Primary Completion
2023-12-31
Completion
2024-03-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05956171 on ClinicalTrials.gov