Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mother Screening for Relapse Using Mid-upper Arm Circumference Among Children Recovered From Severe Acute Malnutrition (NCT NCT05932992)

NCT ID: NCT05932992

Last Updated: 2026-07-17

Results Overview

Time to relapse using a log-rank test with a term for randomized treatment assignment will be used. Relapse will be defined using the Burkina Faso guideline for detecting malnutrition (MUAC \< 11.5 cm and / or weight-for-height Z-scores WHZ \< -3 SD)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

400 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2026-07-17

Participant Flow

A total of 200 mother/caregiver-child dyads were enrolled, representing 400 individual participants: 200 mothers/caregivers and 200 children. The Protocol Enrollment number and Participant Flow milestones represent individual participants. Comments indicate the corresponding number of mothers/caregivers, children, and dyads for each milestone.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Mother Screening
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
Overall Study
STARTED
198
202
Overall Study
COMPLETED
186
180
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
12
22

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Child's age.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Mother Screening
n=198 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
n=202 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
Total
n=400 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
14 months
n=99 Participants • Child's age.
15 months
n=101 Participants • Child's age.
14.5 months
n=200 Participants • Child's age.
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants
n=99 Participants • Child's sex.
53 Participants
n=101 Participants • Child's sex.
96 Participants
n=200 Participants • Child's sex.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants
n=99 Participants • Child's sex.
48 Participants
n=101 Participants • Child's sex.
104 Participants
n=200 Participants • Child's sex.
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=198 Participants
0 Participants
n=202 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=198 Participants
0 Participants
n=202 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=198 Participants
0 Participants
n=202 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
198 Participants
n=198 Participants
202 Participants
n=202 Participants
400 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=198 Participants
0 Participants
n=202 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=198 Participants
0 Participants
n=202 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=198 Participants
0 Participants
n=202 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Burkina Faso
198 participants
n=198 Participants
202 participants
n=202 Participants
400 participants
n=400 Participants
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)
13 cm
n=99 Participants • Child's MUAC.
13.1 cm
n=101 Participants • Child's MUAC.
13 cm
n=200 Participants • Child's MUAC.
Weight for Height Z Score (WHZ)
-1.5 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=99 Participants • Child's WHZ.
-1.6 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=101 Participants • Child's WHZ.
-1.5 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=200 Participants • Child's WHZ.
Weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ)
-2.1 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=99 Participants • Child's WAZ.
-2.1 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=101 Participants • Child's WAZ.
-2.1 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=200 Participants • Child's WAZ.
Height-for-age Z-score (HAZ)
-1.9 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=99 Participants • Child's HAZ.
-1.8 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=101 Participants • Child's HAZ.
-1.9 z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=200 Participants • Child's HAZ.
Hemoglobin
10.2 g/dL
n=99 Participants • Child's hemoglobin level.
10.4 g/dL
n=101 Participants • Child's hemoglobin level.
10.3 g/dL
n=200 Participants • Child's hemoglobin level.
Household dietary diversity was reported by the mother/caregiver and reflects household-level dietar
11 units on a scale
n=99 Participants • Household dietary diversity score.
10 units on a scale
n=101 Participants • Household dietary diversity score.
10 units on a scale
n=200 Participants • Household dietary diversity score.
Caregiver relationship
Mother
98 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's relationship to child.
98 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's relationship to child.
196 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's relationship to child.
Caregiver relationship
Grandmother
1 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's relationship to child.
3 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's relationship to child.
4 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's relationship to child.
Caregiver age
24 years
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's age.
26 years
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's age.
25 years
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's age.
Caregiver education
None
70 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's education.
82 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's education.
152 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's education.
Caregiver education
Primary
21 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's education.
11 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's education.
32 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's education.
Caregiver education
Secondary
5 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's education.
6 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's education.
11 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's education.
Caregiver education
College or above
3 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's education.
2 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's education.
5 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's education.
Caregiver occupation
Household
85 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
93 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
178 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
Caregiver occupation
Agriculture
9 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
5 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
14 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
Caregiver occupation
Retail
3 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
3 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
6 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
Caregiver occupation
Other
2 Participants
n=99 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
0 Participants
n=101 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
2 Participants
n=200 Participants • Caregiver's occupation.
Number of children <5 years in household
2 children in household
n=99 Participants • Number of children the caregiver has.
2 children in household
n=101 Participants • Number of children the caregiver has.
2 children in household
n=200 Participants • Number of children the caregiver has.
Household food insecurity was reported by the mother/caregiver and reflects household-level food acc
Food secure
39 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household food insecurity.
34 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household food insecurity.
73 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household food insecurity.
Household food insecurity was reported by the mother/caregiver and reflects household-level food acc
Mildly food insecure
18 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household food insecurity.
25 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household food insecurity.
43 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household food insecurity.
Household food insecurity was reported by the mother/caregiver and reflects household-level food acc
Moderately food insecure
26 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household food insecurity.
21 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household food insecurity.
47 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household food insecurity.
Household food insecurity was reported by the mother/caregiver and reflects household-level food acc
Severely food insecure
16 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household food insecurity.
21 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household food insecurity.
37 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household food insecurity.
Water source
Running water or tubewell
53 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's water source.
53 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's water source.
106 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's water source.
Water source
Protected dug well
44 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's water source.
47 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's water source.
91 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's water source.
Water source
Unprotected dug well
1 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's water source.
1 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's water source.
2 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's water source.
Water source
Other
1 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's water source.
0 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's water source.
1 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's water source.
Sanitary installation
Improved pit latrine
15 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
13 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
28 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
Sanitary installation
Simple latrine with slab
78 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
83 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
161 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
Sanitary installation
Simple sand dale latrine
6 Participants
n=99 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
5 Participants
n=101 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.
11 Participants
n=200 Participants • Household's sanitary installation.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: Relapses were measured in children. Not the caregivers.

Time to relapse using a log-rank test with a term for randomized treatment assignment will be used. Relapse will be defined using the Burkina Faso guideline for detecting malnutrition (MUAC \< 11.5 cm and / or weight-for-height Z-scores WHZ \< -3 SD)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mother Screening
n=93 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
n=90 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
Time to Detection of Relapse
49 days
Interval 32.0 to 147.2
103 days
Interval 34.0 to 173.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: This outcome was assessed among child participants only. Caregivers were not included in this outcome analysis.

Weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) is the number of standard deviations a child's weight-for-height differs from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards reference population. A Z-score of 0 represents the reference population median. Higher WHZ values indicate better nutritional status, while lower values indicate greater wasting. WHZ below -2 SD indicates wasting, and WHZ below -3 SD indicates severe wasting/severe acute malnutrition. There is no fixed minimum or maximum value for this standardized Z-score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mother Screening
n=93 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
n=90 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
Weight for Height Z Score (WHZ)
-0.52 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.3
-0.74 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: This outcome was assessed among child participants only. Caregivers were not included in this outcome analysis.

Weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) is the number of standard deviations a child's weight-for-age differs from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards reference population. A Z-score of 0 represents the reference population median. Higher WAZ values indicate better nutritional status, while lower values indicate greater underweight. WAZ below -2 SD indicates underweight, and WAZ below -3 SD indicates severe underweight. There is no fixed minimum or maximum value for this standardized Z-score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mother Screening
n=93 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
n=90 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
Weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ)
-1.48 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.1
-1.71 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: This outcome was assessed among child participants only. Caregivers were not included in this outcome analysis.

Height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) is the number of standard deviations a child's height-for-age differs from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards reference population. A Z-score of 0 represents the reference population median. Higher HAZ values indicate better linear growth, while lower values indicate greater stunting. HAZ below -2 SD indicates stunting, and HAZ below -3 SD indicates severe stunting. There is no fixed minimum or maximum value for this standardized Z-score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mother Screening
n=93 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
n=90 Participants
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
Height-for-age Z-score (HAZ)
-2.17 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.5
-2.28 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.4

Adverse Events

Mother Screening

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Standard of Care

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 4 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Mother Screening
n=99 participants at risk
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. Mothers will be trained to measure mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on their children weekly for 6 months. All other standard care will be provided. Mother education on how to perform MUAC assessment: Mothers will be trained to perform MUAC weekly on their children
Standard of Care
n=101 participants at risk
In this arm, mothers / children dyads will be enrolled. No study intervention will be performed. all other standard of care will be provided.
General disorders
Hospitalization
3.0%
3/99 • 6 months
Adverse events were monitored and reported for the children only. Not the caregivers.
8.9%
9/101 • 6 months
Adverse events were monitored and reported for the children only. Not the caregivers.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Catherine Oldenburg

UCSF FI Proctor Foundation

Phone: 415-502-8843

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place