Trial Outcomes & Findings for Accelerated rTMS for Post-Stroke Apathy (NCT NCT05878457)
NCT ID: NCT05878457
Last Updated: 2026-07-10
Results Overview
The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is a validated 33-item structured interview assessing apathy across 9 domains, including intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation, self-awareness, productivity, interests, novelty seeking, motivation, and social engagement. Total scores range from -36 to +36, with higher scores indicating greater severity of apathy (worse outcome) and lower (more negative) scores indicating less apathy (better outcome). The total score is calculated by summing responses across all items and domains to generate a composite score.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
21 participants
Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one-month follow-up
2026-07-10
Participant Flow
A total of 21 participants provided informed consent and were considered enrolled. Of these, 6 participants were excluded prior to treatment initiation due to ineligibility or withdrawal. Fifteen participants were assigned to the intervention and initiated treatment.
Of 21 participants who provided informed consent (enrolled), 6 were excluded prior to treatment initiation due to MRI contraindications (n=3), failure to meet apathy inclusion criteria (n=1), new neurological diagnosis (n=1), and claustrophobia (n=1). Fifteen participants met eligibility criteria and were assigned to the intervention and initiated treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Accelerated rTMS for Post-Stroke Apathy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.03 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
11 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one-month follow-upThe Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is a validated 33-item structured interview assessing apathy across 9 domains, including intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation, self-awareness, productivity, interests, novelty seeking, motivation, and social engagement. Total scores range from -36 to +36, with higher scores indicating greater severity of apathy (worse outcome) and lower (more negative) scores indicating less apathy (better outcome). The total score is calculated by summing responses across all items and domains to generate a composite score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Apathy Symptoms, as Measured by the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) Compared to Baseline
Pre-treatment
|
-20.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.56
|
|
Change in Apathy Symptoms, as Measured by the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) Compared to Baseline
Immediate post-treatment
|
-23.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.89
|
|
Change in Apathy Symptoms, as Measured by the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) Compared to Baseline
One-month follow-up
|
-26.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.04
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Across the 3 rTMS treatment daysA review of systems questionnaire (Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems; iTBS ROS) was administered repeatedly during each treatment day to assess treatment-emergent symptoms. Symptoms were rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, 5 = severe), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity (worse outcome). Values reported represent the average symptom severity across all assessments collected during the 3 treatment days for each participant, and then averaged across participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Headache, treatment day 2
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Headache, treatment day 3
|
0.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Scalp pain, treatment day 1
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Arm/hand pain, treatment day 1
|
1.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Arm/hand pain, treatment day 2
|
1.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Arm/hand pain, treatment day 3
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Other pain(s), treatment day 1
|
1.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Weakness, treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Loss of dexterity, treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Vision change(s), treatment day 1
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Vision change(s), treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Hearing change(s), treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Headache, treatment day 1
|
0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Scalp pain, treatment day 2
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Scalp pain, treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Other pain(s), treatment day 2
|
0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Other pain(s), treatment day 3
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Weakness, treatment day 1
|
0.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Weakness, treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Loss of dexterity, treatment day 1
|
0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Loss of dexterity, treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Vision change(s), treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Hearing change(s), treatment day 1
|
0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Hearing change(s), treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Ear ringing, treatment day 1
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Ear ringing, treatment day 2
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Ear ringing, treatment day 3
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Nausea/vomiting, treatment day 1
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Nausea/vomiting, treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Nausea/vomiting, treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Appetite loss, treatment day 1
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Appetite loss, treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Appetite loss, treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Rash, treatment day 1
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Rash, treatment day 2
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Rash, treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Skin change(s), treatment day 1
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Skin change(s), treatment day 2
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as Assessed by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Review of Systems (iTBS ROS)
Skin change(s), treatment day 3
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one-month follow-upThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a clinical assessment of cognitive function. The MoCA assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, visuospatial skills, executive function, attention, concentration, calculation, language, abstraction, and orientation. The MoCA can be administered in approximately 10 minutes and total scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores correlating with greater degree of cognitive impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Global Cognition, as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Compared to Baseline
Pre-treatment
|
24.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.23
|
|
Change in Global Cognition, as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Compared to Baseline
Immediate post-treatment
|
25.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
|
Change in Global Cognition, as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Compared to Baseline
One-month follow-up
|
25.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatmentFluid cognition was measured using the iPad-administered NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). Fluid Cognition Composite scores were calculated by averaging the demographically adjusted (age, education, sex, race/ethnicity; Casaletto et al., 2015) T-scores for 5 NIHTB-CB tests: the flanker inhibitory control, list sorting working memory, pattern comparison processing speed, dimensional change card sort tests, and picture sequence memory. T-Scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate worse performance. There are no established thresholds or cutoffs for clinically distinct or diagnostic categories.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline Cognition, as Measured by the Fluid Cognition Composite Score From the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Compared to Baseline
Pre-treatment
|
35.67 T-score
Standard Deviation 13.44
|
|
Change From Baseline Cognition, as Measured by the Fluid Cognition Composite Score From the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Compared to Baseline
Immediate post-treatment
|
40.25 T-score
Standard Deviation 16.92
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: calculated at the end of the study follow-up assessment period (one month post-treatment)Percentage of participants who completed the study relative to all participants who initiated treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=15 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Participant Retention Rate
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one-month follow-upThe Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) clinically validated rating scale assessing symptoms of apathy. The AES is comprised of 18 items rated on a four-point Likert-Scale assessing and quantifying emotional, behavioral and cognitive aspects of apathy. Total scores on the AES range from 18 to 72 with high scores correlating with greater severity of apathy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Apathy Symptoms, as Measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) Compared to Baseline
Immediately post-treatment
|
33.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.63
|
|
Change in Apathy Symptoms, as Measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) Compared to Baseline
One-month follow-up
|
30.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
|
Change in Apathy Symptoms, as Measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) Compared to Baseline
Pre-treatment
|
37.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one-month follow-upThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing depressive symptoms, including negative mood, cognitive symptoms, and decreased positive affect. Scores are reported as T-scores standardized to the U.S. general population, where a T-score of 50 represents the population mean and 10 represents the standard deviation. Higher T-scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity (worse outcome), while lower T-scores indicate fewer depressive symptoms (better outcome). T-scores of approximately 60 or greater are generally considered indicative of at least mild clinically elevated depressive symptoms, with higher thresholds reflecting increasing severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=14 Participants
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form
Pre-treatment
|
53.60 T-score
Standard Deviation 7.78
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form
Immediate post-treatment
|
52.11 T-score
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form
One-month follow-up
|
46.89 T-score
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
Adverse Events
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
n=15 participants at risk
All participants received open-label accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) delivered in repeated sessions of 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered, each consisting of 20 trains of 30 pulses in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 milliseconds (5 Hz Theta frequency) with 2-second trains and 8-second inter-train intervals for 190 seconds per session. Sessions were separated by a 10-15 minute inter-session interval. twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Sessions were repeated for 12 sessions per day on each of three treatment days within a 7 day window, for a total of 36 rTMS sessions and 21,600 total pulses. All participants were assessed for outcomes at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and for 1 month of post-treatment follow up.
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headach
|
40.0%
6/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Scalp pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arm/hand pain
|
46.7%
7/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
General disorders
Other pain
|
40.0%
6/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Weakness
|
20.0%
3/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
General disorders
Loss of dexterity
|
13.3%
2/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hearing changes
|
6.7%
1/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ear ringing
|
20.0%
3/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin changes
|
6.7%
1/15 • from enrollment to the end of follow up, up to 12 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place