Comparison Effects of Two Regional Anesthetic Technique on Pain During High Risk Hip Fracture Surgery

NCT05862922 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-12-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study, our is to compare effect of lumbosacral plexus and sacral plexus + suprainguinal fascia iliaca plane block on perioperative pain via analgesia nociceptive index monitor on high-risk patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Conditions

  • Pain
  • Hip Fractures
  • Perioperative Analgesia

Interventions

DEVICE

Analgesia Nosiception İndex Monitoring

ANI is a monitor that can be measured continuously and non-invasively. It measures parasympathetic tone - based on electrocardiography - by analyzing minimal changes in heart rate that occur under anesthesia, in the early stages of awakening, and in each respiratory cycle of awake patients. At the end of the measurement, a value between 0-100 is obtained. Parasympathetic modulation (stress level, e.g., pain) is obtained with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum of 100. ANI values measured in the early period of recovery correlate with pain scores. When compared with hemodynamic parameters, it has been reported that the ANI response is more sensitive to nociceptive stimuli occurring in the intraoperative period.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • TC Erciyes University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-11-26
Primary Completion
2024-02-26
Completion
2024-02-26
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05862922 on ClinicalTrials.gov