Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Dementia: A Two-Armed Pragmatic Trial (NCT NCT05860127)
NCT ID: NCT05860127
Last Updated: 2026-03-23
Results Overview
Cognitive Impairment was assessed using one of the following cognitive assessment tools: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam, or the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). A 'crosswalk' was used to convert all cognitive assessment measures to a MoCA score. MoCA scores range from 0-30, with 26+ generally considered normal, while scores below that suggest cognitive issues: 18-25 is often mild impairment, 10-17 is moderate, and under 10 is severe impairment. All participants started with a baseline MoCA score of 10 to 26 which indicates mild-moderate cognitive impairment.
COMPLETED
NA
133 participants
12 months
2026-03-23
Participant Flow
Subject participants were identified from patient panels of two physicians in two health care systems (HCSs), one at UConn Health and one at Yale. From review of EHR records at both sites, a total of 224 eligible patients were identified. Target enrollment was 168 participants. Physicians screened out 87 participants from the trial. After patient screening by physicians, a total of 133 participants were enrolled: 94 from the Yale site and 39 from UConn Health.
133 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Participants were enrolled at the time of randomization.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
83
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
47
|
80
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
1 unknown age for the control group
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=50 Participants
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
n=83 Participants
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
Total
n=133 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
33 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=133 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=133 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
44 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=133 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=133 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=133 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=133 Participants
|
|
Pre-assessment MoCA
|
19.60 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.90 • n=50 Participants
|
19.76 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.84 • n=83 Participants
|
19.70 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.85 • n=133 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.46 • n=50 Participants • 1 unknown age for the control group
|
73.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.32 • n=82 Participants • 1 unknown age for the control group
|
73.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.32 • n=132 Participants • 1 unknown age for the control group
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Participants were randomized to intervention or standard of care group.
Cognitive Impairment was assessed using one of the following cognitive assessment tools: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam, or the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). A 'crosswalk' was used to convert all cognitive assessment measures to a MoCA score. MoCA scores range from 0-30, with 26+ generally considered normal, while scores below that suggest cognitive issues: 18-25 is often mild impairment, 10-17 is moderate, and under 10 is severe impairment. All participants started with a baseline MoCA score of 10 to 26 which indicates mild-moderate cognitive impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=50 Participants
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
n=83 Participants
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cognitive Impairment
|
19 Score on a scale
Interval 5.64 to 34.64
|
19 Score on a scale
Interval 6.51 to 31.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: Participants were evaluated based on acceptance of referral
V-CST referral will be favorably received by participants. V-CST referral will be assessed by referral acceptance rate measured by percentage of people referred for V-CST who accept the referral from their physician over the 1-month referral period process. This outcome will be assessed at the end of the referral process. The referral process is defined by the physician offering the referral to participants, the acceptance of the referral then leads to the physician sending the referral to the CBO to follow up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=50 Participants
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Accepted the Referral
Participant who accepted referral
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Accepted the Referral
Participants who declined referral offer
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Accepted the Referral
Participants not offered referral by physician
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 weeksPopulation: Participants evaluated based on participant attendance in CST
Participant completion will be measured as the percentage of enrolled participants who attend V-CST as a completer. A participant is considered a V-CST completer if they attend at least 8 or more of V-CST sessions. This outcome will be assessed at the end of the final V-CST session. Of the 50 participants randomized to the intervention, 42 participants were referred for V-CST.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=42 Participants
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Completed Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
Participants who accepted the referral and were approved by the CBO for V-CST participation
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Completed Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
Participants who completed V-CST (this row is a subset of first row)
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Completed Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
Participants who were lost to attrition before completing V-CST (this row is a subset of first row)
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 weeksPopulation: Of the 42 individuals referred for V-CST, 16 (38.1%) accepted the referral and were approved by the CBO for V-CST participation. Of these 16 individuals, nine (56.3%) completed V-CST and seven (43.7%) were lost to attrition before completing V-CST.
V-CST treatment will be favorably received by participants. Of the 50 participants randomized to the intervention, 42 participants were referred for V-CST, with 16 participants agreeing to participate and enrolled in V-CST. Participant attrition will be measured as the percentage of enrolled participants who cease attending V-CST between session 1 and session 14. V-CST sessions will be conducted over a 7-week period. This outcome will be assessed at the end of the 7th week V-CST session.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=16 Participants
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Did Not Complete CST
Participants who completed V-CST
|
9 participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Did Not Complete CST
Participants who did not complete V-CST
|
7 participants
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsFor each participant, we determined whether there was a decrease in psychotropic medications and no increase in psychotropic medications (i.e., favorable psychotropic medication outcomes), and then calculated the proportion of participants with favorable psychotropic medication outcomes across arms
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=50 Participants
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
n=83 Participants
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease and With no Increase in Psychotropic Medications
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
Standard of Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=50 participants at risk
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
n=83 participants at risk
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Foot infection
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Uncontrolled diabetes
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
General disorders
Failure to thrive
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Altered Mental Status
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic Encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular Exacerbation
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Perinephric hematoma
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Febrile Illness/Sepsis
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory illness
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parkinson's disease
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COPD exacerbation
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
0.00%
0/83 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Trcyclic acid overdose
|
0.00%
0/50 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Referral for Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
n=50 participants at risk
This group will receive a referral from their physician for CST treatment
|
Standard of Care
n=83 participants at risk
This group will receive standard of care and no CST referral.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fall
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
10.8%
9/83 • Number of events 9 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
4.8%
4/83 • Number of events 4 • Participants were reviewed for adverse events over a 12 month period
Participants electronic health records were reviewed for doctors visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place