Trial Outcomes & Findings for Switch Over Study of Biosimilar Agalsidase Beta for Fabry Disease (NCT NCT05843916)

NCT ID: NCT05843916

Last Updated: 2026-02-18

Results Overview

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the equivalence in efficacy between AGA BETA BS and Fabrazyme® after 6 months of treatment in participants with Fabry disease previously stabilized with Fabrazyme, by measuring disease biomarker. Endpoint: Mean serum Lyso-Gb3 marker ratio after 26 weeks of treatment, defined as serum level of the marker Lyso-Gb3 after 26 weeks (6 months) divided by serum level of the marker Lyso-Gb3 at baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

20 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®) and 26 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS)

Results posted on

2026-02-18

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Lead in (Fabrazyme)
STARTED
20
Lead in (Fabrazyme)
COMPLETED
19
Lead in (Fabrazyme)
NOT COMPLETED
1
Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)
STARTED
19
Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)
COMPLETED
18
Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)
NOT COMPLETED
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Lead in (Fabrazyme)
Withdrawal by Subject
1
Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)
Pregnancy
1

Baseline Characteristics

Switch Over Study of Biosimilar Agalsidase Beta for Fabry Disease

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS
n=20 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Continuous
35.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
20 participants
n=4 Participants
Height
162.2 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=4 Participants
Weight
69.9 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3 • n=4 Participants
BMI
26.4 Kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=4 Participants
Fabry disease Phenotype
Classic Male
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
Fabry disease Phenotype
Classic Female
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
Fabry disease Phenotype
Late Onset Male
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Fabry disease Phenotype
Late Onset Female
0 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®) and 26 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS)

Population: Differences are explained by the availability of samples collected within the correct protocol-defined window and the withdrawal of one subject before the start of the treatment period.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the equivalence in efficacy between AGA BETA BS and Fabrazyme® after 6 months of treatment in participants with Fabry disease previously stabilized with Fabrazyme, by measuring disease biomarker. Endpoint: Mean serum Lyso-Gb3 marker ratio after 26 weeks of treatment, defined as serum level of the marker Lyso-Gb3 after 26 weeks (6 months) divided by serum level of the marker Lyso-Gb3 at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=20 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
n=17 Participants
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Change From Baseline in Lyso Gb3 Serum Levels
Mean baseline Lyso-Gb3
4.99 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.10
5.12 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.15
Change From Baseline in Lyso Gb3 Serum Levels
Mean 26 weeks Lyso-Gb3
4.95 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.31
5.14 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.45

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®) and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS)

Population: Differences are explained by the availability of samples collected within the correct visit window, the withdrawal of one subject before the start of the treatment period, and the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy before the Week 54 study visit.

To evaluate the difference in efficacy between AGA BETA BS and Fabrazyme® after 1 year (54 weeks) of treatment in participants with Fabry disease previously stabilized with Fabrazyme®, by measuring disease biomarker. Endpoint: Mean serum Lyso-Gb3 marker ratio after 54 weeks of treatment, defined as serum level of the marker Lyso-Gb3 after 54 weeks (12 months) divided by serum level of the marker Lyso-Gb3 at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=20 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
n=17 Participants
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Change From Baseline in Lyso-Gb3 Serum Levels
Mean baseline Lyso-Gb3
4.99 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.102
5.12 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.15
Change From Baseline in Lyso-Gb3 Serum Levels
Mean 54 weeks Lyso-Gb3
4.69 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.51
4.71 Nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.61

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N at Week 54 is explained by the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy.

To compare the pain severity before and after the treatment with AGA BETA BS in participants with Fabry disease previously stabilized with Fabrazyme®, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a validated patient-reported outcome instrument assessing pain severity and pain-related interference with daily activities. Pain severity is assessed using four items rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = no pain; 10 = pain as bad as imaginable), with the score calculated as the mean of items (range 0-10; higher scores indicate worse pain). Pain interference is assessed using seven items rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = does not interfere; 10 = completely interferes), with the score calculated as the mean of items (range 0-10; higher scores indicate worse outcome). Endpoint: Change from baseline in pain severity as assessed by BPI-short form pain severity items scores after 26 and 54 weeks of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Change From Baseline in Pain Severity as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-short Form Pain Severity Items Scores
Baseline
1.88 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
Change From Baseline in Pain Severity as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-short Form Pain Severity Items Scores
26 weeks
1.46 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
Change From Baseline in Pain Severity as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-short Form Pain Severity Items Scores
54 weeks
1.18 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.24

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N reflects the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy before week 54 visit and the availability of determinations that were either missing at specific visits or collected outside the correct protocol-defined window.

To compare the impact of pain on daily functions before and after the treatment with AGA BETA BS in participants with Fabry disease previously stabilized with Fabrazyme®, as measured by the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory)-short form. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a validated patient-reported outcome instrument assessing pain severity and pain-related interference with daily activities. Pain severity is assessed using four items rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = no pain; 10 = pain as bad as imaginable), with the score calculated as the mean of items (range 0-10; higher scores indicate worse pain). Pain interference is assessed using seven items rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = does not interfere; 10 = completely interferes), with the score calculated as the mean of items (range 0-10; higher scores indicate worse outcome). Endpoint: Change from baseline in pain severity as assessed by BPI-short form pain severity items scores after 26 and 54 weeks of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Change From Baseline in Pain Interference as Assessed by BPI-short Form Pain Interference Items Scores
Baseline
2.56 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
Change From Baseline in Pain Interference as Assessed by BPI-short Form Pain Interference Items Scores
26 weeks
1.64 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
Change From Baseline in Pain Interference as Assessed by BPI-short Form Pain Interference Items Scores
54 weeks
2.25 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N at Week 54 is explained by the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy.

To compare the participants' perception of their own health before and after the treatment with AGA BETA BS in participants with Fabry disease previously stabilized with Fabrazyme®, as measured by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). The Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) is a validated patient-reported outcome instrument consisting of 36 questions designed to assess health-related quality of life. The questionnaire generates scores across eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, pain, general health, energy/fatigue, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and emotional well being), each scored on a 0-100 scale. Domain scores are calculated according to standard scoring algorithms, with higher scores indicating better health status and quality of life. Endpoint: Change from baseline in SF-36 scores after 26 and 54 weeks of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Physical Functioning Score - Mean Baseline
79.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.01
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Physical Functioning Score - Mean 26 weeks
78.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.99
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Physical Functioning Score - Mean 54 weeks
76.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.43
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Role limitations due to physical health- Mean Baseline
71.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 41.05
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Role limitations due to physical health-Mean 26 weeks
73.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.62
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Role limitations due to physical health- Mean 54 weeks
76.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 42.42
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Role limitations due to emotional problems-Mean Baseline
50.88 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 44.95
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Role limitations due to emotional problems- Mean 26 weeks
70.18 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 45.67
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Role limitations due to emotional problems- Mean 54 weeks
62.96 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 46.99
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Energy/fatigue- Mean Baseline
51.10 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.38
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Energy/fatigue- Mean 26 weeks
60.30 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.27
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Energy/fatigue - Mean 54 weeks
55 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.36
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Emotional well-being - Mean Baseline
68.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.54
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Emotional well-being- Mean 26 weeks
71.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.21
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Emotional well-being- Mean 54 weeks
64.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.84
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Social functioning- Mean Baseline
79.61 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.92
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Social functioning- Mean 26 weeks
77.24 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.22
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Social functioning- Mean 54 weeks
79.17 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.29
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Pain- Mean Baseline
69.61 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.03
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Pain- Mean 26 weeks
74.21 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.90
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
Pain- Mean 54 weeks
84.17 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.87
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
General Health-Mean Baseline
60.30 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.28
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
General Health-Mean 26 weeks
62.40 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.77
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Survey Scores
General Health- Mean 54 weeks
57.80 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.27

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 14 weeks, 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The differences in N across visits reflect the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy before week 54 visit and the availability of laboratory determinations at each scheduled visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Blood Urea Nitrogen
5.03 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.19
Mean Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Blood Urea Nitrogen
4.70 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.76
Mean Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Blood Urea Nitrogen
4.34 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.40
Mean Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Blood Urea Nitrogen
4.78 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.82

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N at Week 54 is explained by the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline eGFR
106.05 ml/min/1.73m2
Standard Deviation 25.32
Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks eGFR
107.99 ml/min/1.73m2
Standard Deviation 27.02
Mean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks eGFR
100.47 ml/min/1.73m2
Standard Deviation 26.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The differences in N across visits reflect the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy and the availability of laboratory determinations at each scheduled visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Urine Albumin/Creatinine ratio
9.26 g/mol
Standard Deviation 13.95
Mean Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Urine Albumin/Creatinine ratio
9.14 g/mol
Standard Deviation 12.16
Mean Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Urine Albumin/Creatinine ratio
9.8 g/mol
Standard Deviation 20.52

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 14 weeks, 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The differences in N across visits reflect the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy and the availability of laboratory determinations at each scheduled visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Sodium
141.10 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.16
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Sodium
140.30 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.91
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Sodium
140.40 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.89
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Sodium
140.80 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.71
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Potassium
4.22 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.41
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Potassium
4.36 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.45
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Potassium
4.31 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.37
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Potassium
4.25 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.58
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Magnesium
0.84 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.13
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Magnesium
0.83 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.11
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Magnesium
0.83 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.09
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Magnesium
0.85 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.12
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Calcium
2.43 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.14
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Calcium
2.37 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.12
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Calcium
2.36 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.14
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Calcium
2.40 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.13
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Chloride
104.28 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.26
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Chloride
104.49 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.82
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Chloride
104.72 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 5.24
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Bicarbonate
24.18 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.84
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Bicarbonate
24.47 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.33
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Bicarbonate
24.25 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.44
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Bicarbonate
23.78 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.50
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Phosphate
1.12 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.40
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Phosphate
1.11 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.28
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Phosphate
1.21 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.25
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Phosphate
1.28 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.22
Mean Electrolyte and Phosphate Levels at Specified Timepoints
Mean 14 weeks Chloride
103.71 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.51

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N at Week 54 is explained by the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy.

Evaluation of Heart Rate based on the analysis of electrocardiogram exams performed at baseline, 26 weeks and 54 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Heart Rate From Electrocardiogram Assessments at Specified Timepoints
Baseline Mean ECG-assesed Heart Rate
61.80 Beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.06
Mean Heart Rate From Electrocardiogram Assessments at Specified Timepoints
26 weeks Mean ECG-assesed Heart Rate
64.50 Beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.93
Mean Heart Rate From Electrocardiogram Assessments at Specified Timepoints
54 weeks Mean ECG-assesed Heart Rate
63.10 Beats/min
Standard Deviation 12.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The differences in N across visits reflect the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy and the availability of determinations at each scheduled visit.

Evaluation of PR, QRS, QT , QTcB and QTcF intervals based on the analysis of electrocardiogram exams performed at baseline, 26 weeks and 54 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks QTcB interval
407.30 msec
Standard Deviation 34.80
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks QTcB interval
420.20 msec
Standard Deviation 41.39
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline QTcF interval
421.50 msec
Standard Deviation 28.04
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks QTcF interval
404.30 msec
Standard Deviation 42.06
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks QTcF interval
415.60 msec
Standard Deviation 35.21
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline PR interval
130.30 msec
Standard Deviation 45.71
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks PR interval
119.2 msec
Standard Deviation 36.72
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks PR interval
127 msec
Standard Deviation 37.98
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline QRS interval
79.5 msec
Standard Deviation 10.05
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks QRS interval
80.50 msec
Standard Deviation 8.77
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks QRS interval
85.50 msec
Standard Deviation 16.40
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline QT interval
416.60 msec
Standard Deviation 36.95
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks QT interval
398.90 msec
Standard Deviation 46.90
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks QT interval
411.10 msec
Standard Deviation 37.79
Mean PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF Intervals at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline QTcB interval
417.20 msec
Standard Deviation 22.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N at Week 54 is explained by the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy.

Evaluation of cardiac function based on the analysis of bidimensional echocardiogram exams performed at baseline, 26 weeks and 54 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Left Ventricular Wall Thickness at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Left Ventricle wall thickness
9.04 mm
Standard Deviation 2.27
Mean Left Ventricular Wall Thickness at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Left Ventricle wall thickness
8.38 mm
Standard Deviation 2.47
Mean Left Ventricular Wall Thickness at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Left Ventricle wall thickness
9.65 mm
Standard Deviation 2.29

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The differences in N across visits reflect the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy and the availability of determinations at each scheduled visit.

Evaluation of cardiac function based on the analysis of bidimensional echocardiogram exams performed at baseline, 26 weeks and 54 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Left Ventricular Mass Index at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Left Ventricular Mass Index
95.96 g/m²
Standard Deviation 37.31
Mean Left Ventricular Mass Index at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Left Ventricular Mass Index
110.13 g/m²
Standard Deviation 43.37
Mean Left Ventricular Mass Index at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Left Ventricular Mass Index
85.50 g/m²
Standard Deviation 35.33

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®), 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: The difference in N at Week 54 is explained by the discontinuation of one subject due to pregnancy.

Evaluation of cardiac function based on the analysis of bidimensional echocardiogram exams performed at baseline, 26 weeks and 54 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Mean Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Specified Timepoints
Mean Baseline Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction
65.16 percentage of ejection fraction
Standard Deviation 6.21
Mean Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Specified Timepoints
Mean 26 weeks Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction
64.42 percentage of ejection fraction
Standard Deviation 7.27
Mean Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Specified Timepoints
Mean 54 weeks Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction
63.28 percentage of ejection fraction
Standard Deviation 11.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 5 week lead-in period on Fabrazyme®),14 weeks, 26 weeks and 54 weeks (after the switch to AGA BETA BS).

Population: Only one patient was considered positive throughout the study for neutralizing ADA, as it shown \>50% neutralization from baseline to 54 weeks.

Count of participants whose serum samples showed a neutralization percentage of agalsidase beta activity greater than 50%, the predefined threshold indicating a positive result for neutralizing antibodies. Neutralizing antibody activity was evaluated using blood samples collected at Baseline, Week 14, Week 26, and Week 54. Participants with neutralization values exceeding the 50% cutoff were classified as positive for neutralizing antibodies at each timepoint.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Intention to Treat Population)
n=19 Participants
The study has a single-arm. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them, and afterwards all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks
Fabrazyme Then AGA BETA BS (Per Protocol Population)
Per Protocol set will include all participants who satisfactorily complete the study and comply with the requirements of the protocol. It is a subset of the ITT population without any major/Critical protocol deviations impacting the primary endpoint of the study.
Number of Participants With Positive Neutralizing Antibodies at Specified Timepoints
Baseline
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Neutralizing Antibodies at Specified Timepoints
14 weeks
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Neutralizing Antibodies at Specified Timepoints
26 weeks
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Neutralizing Antibodies at Specified Timepoints
54 weeks
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Lead-in Period (Fabrazyme)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 17 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Lead-in Period (Fabrazyme)
n=20 participants at risk
This is a single-arm study design where participants will serve as their own controls. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks.
Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)
n=19 participants at risk
After completing Lead-in period, all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Atrophy
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic Stroke
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Lead-in Period (Fabrazyme)
n=20 participants at risk
This is a single-arm study design where participants will serve as their own controls. First, all participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. Recombinant human alpha galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive 2 doses of Fabrazyme® with approximately 14 days between them. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks.
Treatment Period (AGA BETA BS)
n=19 participants at risk
After completing Lead-in period, all participants will switch treatment and receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. Recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A (agalsidase beta): All participants will receive AGA BETA BS for 54 weeks. The dose will be 1 mg/kg of body mass every 2 weeks.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 5 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 4 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 4 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Oral infection
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Infections and infestations
Trichomoniasis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
General disorders
Pyrexia (fever)
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
General disorders
Adverse drug reaction
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 3 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
General disorders
Chills
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal sphincter insufficiency
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Portal hypertensive gastropathy
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
0.00%
0/19 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Immune system disorders
Drug Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperphagia
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
0.00%
0/19 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 2 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal bite
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Adnexa uteri pain
0.00%
0/20 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 13 months
Adverse events were collected using multiple approaches to ensure completeness of safety data. Patients maintained diaries to record any adverse events occurring between visits. In addition, adverse events were systematically assessed at each scheduled study visit. Investigators also conducted follow-up telephone calls after each visit to capture any events that may have arisen in the interim.

Additional Information

Nicolás Manuel Antognoni

Biosidus S.A.U.

Phone: +54 9 1140983909

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Sponsor requires investigators to submit any manuscripts or abstracts for review before public release to protect proprietary information. No specific embargo period is defined in the study documents. This review requirement constitutes a disclosure restriction applicable to investigators.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER