Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis (PN) (NCT NCT05755438)

NCT ID: NCT05755438

Last Updated: 2026-08-12

Results Overview

WI-NRS4 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ≥4-point improvement (reduction) in Worst-Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score from baseline. The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day. Participants with missing Week 12 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

204 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline; Week 12

Results posted on

2026-08-12

Participant Flow

Participants were enrolled at 52 sites in Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and the United States.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
12-week DBVC Period
STARTED
103
101
12-week DBVC Period
COMPLETED
84
90
12-week DBVC Period
NOT COMPLETED
19
11
40-week OLE Period
STARTED
84
90
40-week OLE Period
COMPLETED
68
66
40-week OLE Period
NOT COMPLETED
16
24

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
12-week DBVC Period
Adverse Event
4
1
12-week DBVC Period
Physician Decision
1
1
12-week DBVC Period
Protocol Violation
4
2
12-week DBVC Period
Withdrawal by Subject
9
7
12-week DBVC Period
Sponsor Decision
1
0
40-week OLE Period
Adverse Event
0
2
40-week OLE Period
Lack of Efficacy
1
2
40-week OLE Period
Lost to Follow-up
2
3
40-week OLE Period
Physician Decision
1
2
40-week OLE Period
Protocol Violation
1
1
40-week OLE Period
Withdrawal by Subject
8
12
40-week OLE Period
Sponsor Decision
3
0
40-week OLE Period
Did Not Complete Safety Follow-up Period
0
2

Baseline Characteristics

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis (PN)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Total
n=204 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
2 Participants
n=1 Participants
3 Participants
n=1 Participants
Age, Continuous
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.85 • n=1 Participants
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.78 • n=1 Participants
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.81 • n=1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
n=1 Participants
64 Participants
n=1 Participants
129 Participants
n=1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants
n=1 Participants
37 Participants
n=1 Participants
75 Participants
n=1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
84 Participants
n=1 Participants
87 Participants
n=1 Participants
171 Participants
n=1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 Participants
n=1 Participants
7 Participants
n=1 Participants
16 Participants
n=1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian and Others
9 Participants
n=1 Participants
5 Participants
n=1 Participants
14 Participants
n=1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
n=1 Participants
18 Participants
n=1 Participants
32 Participants
n=1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
88 Participants
n=1 Participants
80 Participants
n=1 Participants
168 Participants
n=1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
1 Participants
n=1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants. Treatment groups were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization regardless of the actual study cream the participant might have applied during their participation in the double-blind, vehicle-controlled period. Participants with a baseline ITCH Score ≥4 were analyzed.

WI-NRS4 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ≥4-point improvement (reduction) in Worst-Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score from baseline. The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day. Participants with missing Week 12 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=102 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
WI-NRS4 Response at Week 12
20.6 percentage of participants
Interval 13.2 to 29.7
44.6 percentage of participants
Interval 34.7 to 54.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 4

Population: ITT Population. Participants with a baseline ITCH Score ≥4 were analyzed. Participants with missing Week 4 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

WI-NRS4 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ≥4-point improvement (reduction) in WI-NRS score from baseline. The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=102 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
WI-NRS4 Response at Week 4
12.7 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 20.8
29.7 percentage of participants
Interval 21.0 to 39.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Participants with missing Week 12 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

Overall-Treatment Success was defined as both a WI-NRS4 response and Investigator's Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo Treatment Success (IGA-CPG-S-TS). IGA-CPG-S-TS was defined as an IGA-CPG-S score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2 grade improvement from baseline. The IGA-CPG-S is an overall severity rating of chronic prurigo on a scale of 0 to 4: 0, clear (no pruriginous lesions); 1, almost clear (rare palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 1-5 lesions\]); 2, mild (few palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 6-19 lesions\]); 3, moderate (many palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 20-100 lesions\]); 4, severe (abundant palpable pruriginous lesions \[over 100 lesions\]).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Percentage of Participants With Overall-Treatment Success at Week 12
2.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 8.3
11.9 percentage of participants
Interval 6.3 to 19.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Participants with missing Week 12 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

IGA-CPG-S-TS was defined as an IGA-CPG-S score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2 grade improvement from baseline. The IGA-CPG-S is an overall severity rating of chronic prurigo on a scale of 0 to 4: 0, clear (no lesions); 1, almost clear (rare palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 1-5 lesions\]); 2, mild (few palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 6-19 lesions\]); 3, moderate (many palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 20-100 lesions\]); 4, severe (abundant palpable pruriginous lesions \[over 100 lesions\]).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Week 12
3.9 percentage of participants
Interval 1.1 to 9.6
15.8 percentage of participants
Interval 9.3 to 24.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Day 7

Population: ITT Population. Participants with a baseline ITCH Score ≥4 were analyzed. Participants with missing Day 7 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

WI-NRS4 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ≥4-point improvement (reduction) in WI-NRS score from baseline. The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
WI-NRS4 Response on Day 7
8.9 percentage of participants
Interval 3.9 to 16.8
23.3 percentage of participants
Interval 15.1 to 33.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2
-1.08 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.196
-2.07 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.199
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4
-1.52 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.247
-2.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.250
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8
-1.89 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.267
-3.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.267
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12
-2.13 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.273
-3.80 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.272

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at least once during the OLE Period. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14
-3.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.526
-4.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.698
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16
-3.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.640
-4.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.736
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20
-4.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.518
-4.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.744
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24
-4.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.628
-4.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.566
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36
-4.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.596
-4.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.680
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40
-4.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.634
-4.89 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.598
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28
-4.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.601
-4.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.606
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32
-4.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.647
-4.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.554
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44
-4.91 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.620
-5.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.338
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48
-4.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.838
-5.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.287
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in WI-NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-4.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.775
-5.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.298

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Participants with a baseline ITCH Score ≥4 were analyzed. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

WI-NRS4 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ≥4-point improvement (reduction) in WI-NRS score from baseline. The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=102 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 2
5.2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.7 to 11.7
22.2 percentage of participants
Interval 14.1 to 32.2
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 4
13.8 percentage of participants
Interval 7.6 to 22.5
34.5 percentage of participants
Interval 24.6 to 45.4
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 8
22.1 percentage of participants
Interval 13.4 to 33.0
48.8 percentage of participants
Interval 37.7 to 60.0
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 12
25.9 percentage of participants
Interval 16.8 to 36.9
52.3 percentage of participants
Interval 41.3 to 63.2
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 14
33.8 percentage of participants
Interval 23.2 to 45.7
55.4 percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 66.3
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 16
42.7 percentage of participants
Interval 31.3 to 54.6
55.8 percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 67.2
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 20
54.1 percentage of participants
Interval 42.1 to 65.7
57.5 percentage of participants
Interval 45.4 to 69.0
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 24
54.8 percentage of participants
Interval 42.7 to 66.5
60.5 percentage of participants
Interval 48.6 to 71.6
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 28
53.6 percentage of participants
Interval 41.2 to 65.7
64.4 percentage of participants
Interval 52.3 to 75.3
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 32
57.6 percentage of participants
Interval 44.8 to 69.7
67.6 percentage of participants
Interval 55.2 to 78.5
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 36
67.2 percentage of participants
Interval 54.6 to 78.2
72.5 percentage of participants
Interval 60.4 to 82.5
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 40
61.2 percentage of participants
Interval 48.5 to 72.9
67.2 percentage of participants
Interval 54.3 to 78.4
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 44
70.5 percentage of participants
Interval 57.4 to 81.5
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 63.0 to 84.7
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 48
60.0 percentage of participants
Interval 47.1 to 72.0
76.5 percentage of participants
Interval 64.6 to 85.9
WI-NRS4 Response at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 52
64.5 percentage of participants
Interval 51.3 to 76.3
74.2 percentage of participants
Interval 61.5 to 84.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Participants with a baseline ITCH Score ≥4 were analyzed. Censored participants were included in the analysis.

The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=102 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Time to ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline in WI-NRS Score
13.0 days
Interval 7.0 to 24.0
5.0 days
Interval 4.0 to 8.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Participants with a baseline ITCH Score ≥4 were analyzed. Censored participants were included in the analysis.

The WI-NRS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a single item rated on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related itch during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10. The WI-NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit WI-NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily WI-NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=102 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Time to ≥4-point Improvement From Baseline in WI-NRS Score
NA days
Interval 60.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants had events.
26.0 days
Interval 18.0 to 39.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Participants with a baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥2 and available data were analyzed.

Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related skin pain during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worse imaginable pain"). The Skin Pain NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit Skin Pain NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=94 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=94 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 2
20.2 percentage of participants
Interval 12.4 to 30.1
36.1 percentage of participants
Interval 25.9 to 47.4
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 4
30.7 percentage of participants
Interval 21.3 to 41.4
56.3 percentage of participants
Interval 44.7 to 67.3
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 8
33.8 percentage of participants
Interval 23.0 to 46.0
64.9 percentage of participants
Interval 53.2 to 75.5
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 12
45.3 percentage of participants
Interval 33.8 to 57.3
65.8 percentage of participants
Interval 54.3 to 76.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population. Participants with a baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥2 and available data were analyzed.

Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related skin pain during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worse imaginable pain"). The Skin Pain NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit Skin Pain NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before the visit day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=76 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=78 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 14
57.1 percentage of participants
Interval 44.7 to 68.9
76.6 percentage of participants
Interval 65.6 to 85.5
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 16
68.6 percentage of participants
Interval 56.4 to 79.1
78.6 percentage of participants
Interval 67.1 to 87.5
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 20
79.4 percentage of participants
Interval 67.9 to 88.3
77.6 percentage of participants
Interval 65.8 to 86.9
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 24
77.9 percentage of participants
Interval 66.2 to 87.1
80.0 percentage of participants
Interval 68.7 to 88.6
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 28
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 62.6 to 85.0
82.4 percentage of participants
Interval 71.2 to 90.5
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 32
78.7 percentage of participants
Interval 66.3 to 88.1
81.0 percentage of participants
Interval 69.1 to 89.8
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 36
79.0 percentage of participants
Interval 66.8 to 88.3
82.8 percentage of participants
Interval 71.3 to 91.1
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 40
82.3 percentage of participants
Interval 70.5 to 90.8
83.1 percentage of participants
Interval 71.0 to 91.6
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 44
87.7 percentage of participants
Interval 76.3 to 94.9
84.1 percentage of participants
Interval 72.7 to 92.1
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 48
81.7 percentage of participants
Interval 69.6 to 90.5
85.7 percentage of participants
Interval 74.6 to 93.3
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-point Improvement (Reduction) in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline
Week 52
86.0 percentage of participants
Interval 74.2 to 93.7
86.0 percentage of participants
Interval 74.2 to 93.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Analysis was conducted per the MMRM model: (Response Variable = Treatment + Stratification Factors \[IGA-CPG-S/Region\] + Visit + Treatment\*Visit). Only participants with available data were analyzed.

Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related skin pain during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worse imaginable pain"). The Skin Pain NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit Skin Pain NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before the visit day. Change from baseline was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2
-1.02 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.187
-1.70 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.187
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4
-1.44 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.242
-2.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.242
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8
-1.84 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.265
-2.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.261
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12
-2.05 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.276
-3.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.271

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

Participants assessed their worst level of prurigo nodularis-related skin pain during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worse imaginable pain"). The Skin Pain NRS score for baseline was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before Day 1 (i.e., Days -7 to -1) for all by-visit summaries. The by-visit Skin Pain NRS score for post-baseline visits was determined by averaging the 7 daily NRS scores before the visit day. Change from baseline was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14
-2.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.540
-3.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.726
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16
-3.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.496
-3.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.691
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20
-3.76 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.486
-3.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.792
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24
-3.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.770
-3.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.839
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28
-3.81 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.691
-4.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.705
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32
-3.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.860
-4.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.785
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36
-4.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.815
-4.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.760
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40
-4.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.928
-4.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.693
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44
-4.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.612
-4.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.705
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48
-4.51 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.664
-4.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.632
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-4.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.551
-4.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.617

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

IGA-CPG-S-TS was defined as an IGA-CPG-S score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2 grade improvement from baseline. The IGA-CPG-S is an overall severity rating of chronic prurigo nodularis on a scale of 0 to 4: 0, clear (no lesions); 1, almost clear (rare palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 1-5 lesions\]); 2, mild (few palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 6-19 lesions\]); 3, moderate (many palpable pruriginous lesions \[approximately 20-100 lesions\]); 4, severe (abundant palpable pruriginous lesions \[over 100 lesions\]). Participants with missing Week 12 data for any reason, including treatment discontinuation (due to development of atopic dermatitis lesions or any other cause), were defined as nonresponders.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 2
1.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.6
2.1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.3 to 7.3
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 4
3.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.7 to 9.0
8.4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.7 to 15.9
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 8
5.8 percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 13.0
15.6 percentage of participants
Interval 8.8 to 24.7
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 12
4.8 percentage of participants
Interval 1.3 to 11.7
17.8 percentage of participants
Interval 10.5 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 14
7.6 percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 15.8
22.5 percentage of participants
Interval 14.3 to 32.6
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 16
17.5 percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 27.6
29.9 percentage of participants
Interval 20.5 to 40.6
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 20
24.1 percentage of participants
Interval 15.1 to 35.0
29.4 percentage of participants
Interval 20.0 to 40.3
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 24
21.5 percentage of participants
Interval 13.1 to 32.2
32.5 percentage of participants
Interval 22.6 to 43.7
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 28
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 15.8 to 36.3
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 23.2 to 44.7
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 32
36.6 percentage of participants
Interval 25.5 to 48.9
37.7 percentage of participants
Interval 26.9 to 49.4
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 36
35.7 percentage of participants
Interval 24.6 to 48.1
38.2 percentage of participants
Interval 27.2 to 50.0
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 40
31.4 percentage of participants
Interval 20.9 to 43.6
36.1 percentage of participants
Interval 25.1 to 48.3
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 44
40.6 percentage of participants
Interval 28.9 to 53.1
39.2 percentage of participants
Interval 28.0 to 51.2
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 48
37.7 percentage of participants
Interval 26.3 to 50.2
35.6 percentage of participants
Interval 24.7 to 47.7
Percentage of Participants With IGA-CPG-S-TS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 52
42.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.2 to 54.5
46.5 percentage of participants
Interval 34.5 to 58.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The Investigator Global Assessment for Activity of Chronic Prurigo (IGA-CPG-A) is an overall severity rating of chronic prurigo nodularis on a scale of 0 to 4: 0, clear (no pruriginous lesions have excoriations or crusts); 1, almost clear (very small proportion of pruriginous lesions have excoriations or crusts \[up to approximately 10% of all pruriginous lesions\]); 2, mild (minority of pruriginous lesions have excoriations or crusts \[approximately 11%-25% of all pruriginous lesions\]); 3, moderate (many pruriginous lesions have excoriations or crusts \[approximately 26%-75% of all pruriginous lesions\]); 4, severe (majority of pruriginous lesions have excoriations or crusts \[approximately 76%-100% of all pruriginous lesions\]).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 2
1.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.6
5.2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.7 to 11.6
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 4
5.3 percentage of participants
Interval 1.7 to 12.0
11.6 percentage of participants
Interval 5.9 to 19.8
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 8
14.0 percentage of participants
Interval 7.4 to 23.1
24.4 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 34.6
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 12
10.7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 19.4
23.3 percentage of participants
Interval 15.1 to 33.4
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 14
17.7 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 27.9
24.7 percentage of participants
Interval 16.2 to 35.0
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 16
31.3 percentage of participants
Interval 21.3 to 42.6
34.5 percentage of participants
Interval 24.6 to 45.4
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 20
27.8 percentage of participants
Interval 18.3 to 39.1
35.3 percentage of participants
Interval 25.2 to 46.4
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 24
39.2 percentage of participants
Interval 28.4 to 50.9
38.6 percentage of participants
Interval 28.1 to 49.9
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 28
39.5 percentage of participants
Interval 28.4 to 51.4
40.7 percentage of participants
Interval 29.9 to 52.2
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 32
40.8 percentage of participants
Interval 29.3 to 53.2
41.6 percentage of participants
Interval 30.4 to 53.4
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 36
41.4 percentage of participants
Interval 29.8 to 53.8
42.1 percentage of participants
Interval 30.9 to 54.0
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 40
41.4 percentage of participants
Interval 29.8 to 53.8
36.1 percentage of participants
Interval 25.1 to 48.3
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 44
44.9 percentage of participants
Interval 32.9 to 57.4
44.6 percentage of participants
Interval 33.0 to 56.6
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 48
46.4 percentage of participants
Interval 34.3 to 58.8
46.6 percentage of participants
Interval 34.8 to 58.6
Percentage of Participants With a IGA-CPG-A Score of 0 or 1 With ≥2-grade Improvement (Reduction) at Each Post-baseline Visit
Week 52
50.7 percentage of participants
Interval 38.4 to 63.0
50.7 percentage of participants
Interval 38.6 to 62.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The extent and severity of prurigo nodularis was assessed via the PAS (version 1.2). The first 3 items are descriptive of the type, predominant type, distribution, and quantity of pruriginous lesions. The remaining 2 items of the PAS assess disease activity in terms of percentage (i.e., 0%, 1%-25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, and 76%-100%) of pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts on top (to reflect active scratching) and the percentage (i.e., 100%, 76%-99%, 51%-75%, 26%-50%, and 0%-25%) of healed pruriginous lesions in order to quantify change of prurigo nodularis skin lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 8
23.3 percentage of participants
Interval 14.8 to 33.6
32.2 percentage of participants
Interval 22.8 to 42.9
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 2
10.3 percentage of participants
Interval 5.1 to 18.1
14.4 percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 23.0
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 4
21.3 percentage of participants
Interval 13.5 to 30.9
26.3 percentage of participants
Interval 17.8 to 36.4
DBVC Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 12
22.6 percentage of participants
Interval 14.2 to 33.0
32.2 percentage of participants
Interval 22.8 to 42.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The extent and severity of prurigo nodularis was assessed via the PAS (version 1.2). The first 3 items are descriptive of the type, predominant type, distribution, and quantity of pruriginous lesions. The remaining 2 items of the PAS assess disease activity in terms of percentage (i.e., 0%, 1%-25%, 26%-50%, 51%-75%, and 76%-100%) of pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts on top (to reflect active scratching) and the percentage (i.e., 100%, 76%-99%, 51%-75%, 26%-50%, and 0%-25%) of healed pruriginous lesions in order to quantify change of prurigo nodularis skin lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 14
36.7 percentage of participants
Interval 26.1 to 48.3
37.1 percentage of participants
Interval 27.1 to 48.0
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 16
40.0 percentage of participants
Interval 29.2 to 51.6
44.8 percentage of participants
Interval 34.1 to 55.9
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 20
46.8 percentage of participants
Interval 35.5 to 58.4
45.9 percentage of participants
Interval 35.0 to 57.0
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 24
58.2 percentage of participants
Interval 46.6 to 69.2
49.4 percentage of participants
Interval 38.2 to 60.6
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 28
61.8 percentage of participants
Interval 50.0 to 72.8
48.1 percentage of participants
Interval 36.9 to 59.5
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 32
62.0 percentage of participants
Interval 49.7 to 73.2
51.9 percentage of participants
Interval 40.3 to 63.5
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 36
62.9 percentage of participants
Interval 50.5 to 74.1
57.9 percentage of participants
Interval 46.0 to 69.1
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 40
64.3 percentage of participants
Interval 51.9 to 75.4
62.5 percentage of participants
Interval 50.3 to 73.6
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 44
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 54.3 to 77.6
68.9 percentage of participants
Interval 57.1 to 79.2
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 48
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 54.3 to 77.6
67.1 percentage of participants
Interval 55.1 to 77.7
OLE Period: Percentage of Participants With >75% Healed Lesions From PAS at Each Postbaseline Visit
Week 52
69.6 percentage of participants
Interval 57.3 to 80.1
66.2 percentage of participants
Interval 54.0 to 77.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The DLQI is a simple, 10-question, validated questionnaire to measure how much the skin problem has affected the participant over the previous 7 days. Each question was scored as: 3 (very much), 2 (a lot), 1 (a little), 0 (not at all or not relevant). The DLQI total score was calculated by summing the score of each question, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more the quality of life was impaired. Total DLQI scores were categorized as follows: 0 to 1 (no effect), 2 to 5 (small effect), 6 to 10 (moderate effect), 11 to 20 (very large effect), and 21 to 30 (extremely large effect). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-baseline visit minus the baseline visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2
-4.47 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.591
-4.67 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.576
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4
-5.37 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.661
-5.71 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.650
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8
-5.17 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.677
-6.25 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.661
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12
-4.65 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.696
-6.04 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.675

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The DLQI is a simple, 10-question, validated questionnaire to measure how much the skin problem has affected the participant over the previous 7 days. Each question was scored as: 3 (very much), 2 (a lot), 1 (a little), 0 (not at all or not relevant). The DLQI total score was calculated by summing the score of each question, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more the quality of life was impaired. Total DLQI scores were categorized as follows: 0 to 1 (no effect), 2 to 5 (small effect), 6 to 10 (moderate effect), 11 to 20 (very large effect), and 21 to 30 (extremely large effect). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-baseline visit minus the baseline visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20
-7.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.406
-6.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.029
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24
-7.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.801
-7.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.149
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28
-7.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.198
-7.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.859
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32
-8.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.769
-8.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.368
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36
-7.85 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.863
-8.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.668
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40
-8.54 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.561
-7.76 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.695
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44
-8.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.417
-7.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.617
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48
-8.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.790
-8.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.091
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-8.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.401
-8.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.453
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14
-7.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.179
-6.91 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.051
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16
-7.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.210
-7.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.054

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels, which are coded by single-digit numbers: 1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, 5 = unable to/extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS (0-100), on which the endpoints are labeled "the best health you can imagine" (100 score) and "the worst health you can imagine" (0 score). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12
5.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.235
11.26 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.171
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2
3.00 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.948
7.90 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.896
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4
5.59 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.940
8.90 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.914
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8
2.52 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.189
9.83 scores on a scale
Standard Error 2.133

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels, which are coded by single-digit numbers: 1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, 5 = unable to/extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS (0-100), on which the endpoints are labeled "the best health you can imagine" (100 score) and "the worst health you can imagine" (0 score). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14
7.54 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.216
10.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.293
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16
6.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.263
11.96 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.199
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20
8.87 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.598
12.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.565
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24
10.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.560
11.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.360
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28
10.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.102
13.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.800
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32
11.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.056
13.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.124
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36
10.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.395
13.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.482
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40
10.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.984
14.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.261
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44
9.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.923
14.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.640
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48
12.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.664
13.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.755
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52
11.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.621
12.51 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.233

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels, which are coded by single-digit numbers: 1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, 5 = unable to/extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS (0-100), on which the endpoints are labeled "the best health you can imagine" (100 score) and "the worst health you can imagine" (0 score). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=101 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2, Mobility
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.912
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.606
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4, Mobility
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.742
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.810
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8, Mobility
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.813
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.690
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12, Mobility
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.973
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.714
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2, Self-care
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.533
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.533
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4, Self-care
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.505
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.493
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8, Self-care
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.581
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.581
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12, Self-care
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.636
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.488
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2, Usual activities
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.782
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.714
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4, Usual activities
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.785
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.727
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8, Usual activities
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.811
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.726
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12, Usual activities
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.727
-0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.723
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2, Pain/discomfort
-0.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.136
-0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.953
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4, Pain/discomfort
-0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.132
-0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.039
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8, Pain/discomfort
-0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.112
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.080
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12, Pain/discomfort
-0.54 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.078
-0.70 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.074
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 2, Anxiety/depression
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.013
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.919
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 4, Anxiety/depression
-0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.102
-0.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.996
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 8, Anxiety/depression
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.045
-0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.934
DBVC Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 12, Anxiety/depression
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.105
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.941

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; up to Week 52

Population: Open-label Extension Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels, which are coded by single-digit numbers: 1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, 5 = unable to/extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS (0-100), on which the endpoints are labeled "the best health you can imagine" (100 score) and "the worst health you can imagine" (0 score). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-baseline value minus the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14, Mobility
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.728
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.872
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16, Mobility
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.657
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.772
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20, Mobility
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.789
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.746
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24, Mobility
-0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.873
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.695
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28, Mobility
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.918
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.833
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32, Mobility
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.957
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.860
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36, Mobility
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.941
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.787
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40, Mobility
-0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.863
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.815
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44, Mobility
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.994
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.815
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48, Mobility
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.889
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.881
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52, Mobility
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.900
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.899
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14, Self-care
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.552
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.606
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16, Self-care
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.562
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.512
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20, Self-care
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.565
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.478
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24, Self-care
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.499
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.470
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28, Self-care
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.493
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.432
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32, Self-care
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.431
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.517
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36, Self-care
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.465
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.536
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40, Self-care
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.469
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.535
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44, Self-care
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.420
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.471
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48, Self-care
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.465
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.496
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52, Self-care
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.434
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.491
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14, Usual activities
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.838
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.769
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16, Usual activities
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.800
-0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.730
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20, Usual activities
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.806
-0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.777
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24, Usual activities
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.802
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.685
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28, Usual activities
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.834
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.845
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32, Usual activities
-0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.792
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.846
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36, Usual activities
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.789
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.647
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40, Usual activities
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.746
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.783
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44, Usual activities
-0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.671
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.750
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48, Usual activities
-0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.755
-0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.781
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52, Usual activities
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.807
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.806
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14, Pain/discomfort
-0.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.040
-0.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.056
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16, Pain/discomfort
-0.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.969
-0.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.084
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20, Pain/discomfort
-0.80 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.924
-0.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.215
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24, Pain/discomfort
-0.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.906
-0.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.098
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28, Pain/discomfort
-0.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.956
-0.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.988
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32, Pain/discomfort
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.953
-0.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.116
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36, Pain/discomfort
-0.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.022
-0.96 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.098
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40, Pain/discomfort
-1.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.015
-1.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.063
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44, Pain/discomfort
-0.98 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.015
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.978
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48, Pain/discomfort
-1.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.960
-0.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.094
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52, Pain/discomfort
-1.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.990
-0.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.158
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 14, Anxiety/depression
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.179
-0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.030
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 16, Anxiety/depression
-0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.167
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.970
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 20, Anxiety/depression
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.971
-0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.932
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 24, Anxiety/depression
-0.34 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.960
-0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.902
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 28, Anxiety/depression
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.958
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.892
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 32, Anxiety/depression
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.887
-0.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.951
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 36, Anxiety/depression
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.029
-0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.015
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 40, Anxiety/depression
-0.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.891
-0.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.959
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 44, Anxiety/depression
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.028
-0.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.901
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 48, Anxiety/depression
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.937
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.881
OLE Period: Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores at Each Postbaseline Visit
Change from Baseline at Week 52, Anxiety/depression
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.892
-0.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.893

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to Week 12

Population: Safety Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream at least once. Treatment groups were determined according to the actual treatment the participant applied on Day 1 regardless of assigned treatment group.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE can therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=100 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
37 Participants
31 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to Week 12

Population: Safety Population

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE can therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of TEAEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each TEAE and assigned it to one of the following categories: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4, life-threatening consequences; Grade 5, fatal.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=103 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=100 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
DBVC Period: Number of Participants With Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE
5 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from beginning of Week 13 up to Week 56

Population: Open-label Extension Population

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE can therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE
44 Participants
56 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from beginning of Week 13 up to Week 56

Population: Open-label Extension Population

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE can therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of TEAEs was assessed using CTCAE version 5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each TEAE and assigned it to one of the following categories: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4, life-threatening consequences; Grade 5, fatal.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=84 Participants
Participants applied vehicle cream BID through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each lesion in the DBVC Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (IGA-CPG-S score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week OLE extension period. Participants randomized to vehicle cream at baseline switched to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID and received treatment through Week 52. During the OLE period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
n=90 Participants
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) through Week 12 to all pruriginous lesions identified at baseline plus an approximate 1 centimeter (cm) area surrounding each lesion in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period. At Week 12, the investigator assessed whether the participant required continuation of therapy (Investigator Global Assessment for Stage of Chronic Prurigo \[IGA-CPG-S\] score ≥1 and/or the presence of prurigo nodularis-related itching). Those participants who completed 12 weeks of treatment with no safety concerns were eligible to enter the 40-week Open-label Extension (OLE) period. Participants randomized to ruxolitinib 1.5% cream at baseline remained on ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID through Week 52. During the OLE Period, participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream BID to prurigo nodularis-affected areas plus an approximate 1 cm area surrounding each pruriginous lesion and/or areas of prurigo nodularis-related itching.
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE
5 Participants
6 Participants

Adverse Events

Vehicle BID

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

INCB018424 1.5% BID

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 33 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Vehicle BID
n=103 participants at risk
Vehicle BID
INCB018424 1.5% BID
n=184 participants at risk
INCB018424 1.5% BID
Infections and infestations
Abscess neck
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Psychiatric disorders
Borderline personality disorder
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bowen's disease
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burns second degree
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.00%
0/184 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.00%
0/184 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hidradenitis
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenitis
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Neurodermatitis
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
1.1%
2/184 • Number of events 2 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary sepsis
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.00%
0/184 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection staphylococcal
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/103 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
0.54%
1/184 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Vehicle BID
n=103 participants at risk
Vehicle BID
INCB018424 1.5% BID
n=184 participants at risk
INCB018424 1.5% BID
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
3.9%
4/103 • Number of events 4 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
6.0%
11/184 • Number of events 11 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
1.9%
2/103 • Number of events 2 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.
12.5%
23/184 • Number of events 30 • up to Week 56
For participants who were on vehicle up to Week 12 and then switched to ruxolitinib, adverse events are presented by the treatment they were on at the onset of the event. Data have been presented for the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who applied at least one dose of ruxolitinib 1.5% cream or vehicle cream.

Additional Information

Study Director

Incyte Corporation

Phone: 1-855-463-3463

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Following the first publication, the Institution and/or Principal Investigator may publish data or results from the Study, provided, however, that the Institution and/or Principal Investigator submits the proposed publication to the Sponsor for review at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the proposed publication. Sponsor may remove from the proposed publication any information that is considered confidential and/or proprietary other than Study data and results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER