IASTM Versus PRT in Patients With Chronic PF

NCT05754697 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2023-09-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial\] is to compare between the effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and positional release technique in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis

The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

1. Is there a difference between the effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and positional release technique on pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis?
2. Is there a difference between the effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and positional release technique on foot function level in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis?

Conditions

  • Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Interventions

OTHER

Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in addition to traditional treatment

The treatment protocol will be two sessions will be given per week for 4 weeks.

OTHER

Positional release technique in addition to traditional treatment

The treatment protocol will be two sessions will be given per week for 4 weeks.

OTHER

Traditional treatment

The treatment protocol will be two sessions will be given per week for 4 weeks.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Doaa Ibrahim · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-03-15
Primary Completion
2023-06-15
Completion
2023-07-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05754697 on ClinicalTrials.gov