Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Obstructed Defecation Surgery
NCT05747027 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 15
Last updated 2025-07-15
Summary
Obstructive defecatory syndrome (ODS) or inability to completely empty bowel is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with bowel movement. This is a common condition with estimated incidence of 15-20% in the adult female population.
Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy is an established surgical technique aimed at restoring rectal support in women with this condition. It is the most common surgery used nowadays to treat ODS. Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy, is an innovative procedure which has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stool entrapment. Currently it is unknown whether one of the procedures mentioned is superior to the other regarding surgical outcomes and patient experience. The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of these two procedures considering their efficacy to improve symptoms.
During the study, participants will be randomized to undergo one of two procedures for treatment of inability to completely empty their bowel and/or rectal prolapse: 1) laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy; 2) transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy. Following the procedure, participants will be asked to return to the office for a follow-up visit 2-weeks, 2-, 12- and 24-months after the surgery. During each follow-up visit participants will undergo symptom evaluation, pelvic exam and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound to evaluate surgical success.
Conditions
- Obstructed Defecation
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy
Laparoscopic abdominal ventral rectopexy is an established surgical technique used to restore rectal support in women with obstructive defecatory syndrome (ODS). It is the most common surgery used to treat ODS. It involves a series of small cuts in the abdomen and the use of mesh to hold the rectum in the correct position.
- PROCEDURE
-
Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy
Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy is an innovative procedure which has shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stool entrapment. This is a mesh-free and vaginal route procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
collaborator OTHER -
University of Pittsburgh
collaborator OTHER -
Endeavor Health
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ghazaleh Rostami Nia, MD · Endeavor Health
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-05-16
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-30
- Completion
- 2025-05-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Mid Urethral Sling Trial
NCT00460434 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Anterior Vaginal Sacrospinofixation With Laparoscopic Promontofixation for the Treatment of Anterior and Apical Genitourinary Prolapse
NCT03200327 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Observational Prolapse Study
NCT04701047 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Quality of Life After Conservative and Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT04110821 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Pelvic Floor Exercise Before Surgery in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03064750 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use
NCT02680145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Apical Prolapse Stage III-IV
NCT01762384 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of a Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery
NCT02111642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Force of Stream to Retrograde Fill Voiding Trial After Vaginal Apex Suspension
NCT02753920 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Observing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptoms And Treatment Outcomes
NCT00784602 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Pelvipower for Faecal Incontinence
NCT05900726 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Plus Mini-Sling Versus Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Alone
NCT01384084 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III
NCT01396109 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) Protocol
NCT00065845 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
the Anatomical Reduction and Functional Recovery Effects of Two Transvaginal Apical Slings on Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05189665 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Virtual Clinical Encounters
NCT04138810 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Conservative Treatment of Functional Defecatory Disorders in Females With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT04547816 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Transvaginal Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Prolapse Treatment
NCT06404931 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Colpocleisis for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00271037 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Timing of Repeat Voiding Trials After Outpatient Pelvic Floor Surgery
NCT03048682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Residual Voiding Volume Following Bulking and Vaginal Prolapse Surgery and Impact on In-hospital Stay
NCT06051916 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Colpocleisis for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00714155 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PEssary Plus Physiotherapy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (PEPPY)
NCT01136889 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Post-operative Symptoms After Two Surgeries for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05697796 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Advanced Genital Prolapse Surgery With and Without Mid Urethral Sling to Prevent Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT02578056 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA