Trial Outcomes & Findings for Culturally Adapted Mobile Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adolescent Survivors of Pediatric Cancer (NCT NCT05746429)

NCT ID: NCT05746429

Last Updated: 2026-02-04

Results Overview

Efficacy of mobile CBT paired with active versus sham tDCS on pain intensity in adolescent survivors with chronic pain. The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI) includes a 4-item pain severity scale. Participants rate their worst and least pain in the last 24 hours, average pain, and current pain using a 10-point rating scale (0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). The pain severity score was calculated as the average of the 4 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Changes in pain intensity from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

68 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Results posted on

2026-02-04

Participant Flow

From April 2023 to August 2024, 68 participants were enrolled across two phases. Phase 1, a cultural adaptation study, included 38 participants in qualitative focus groups. Phase 2, a feasibility clinical trial with two arms, enrolled 33 participants. Three adolescents participated in both phases.

In the cultural adaptation phase, participants took part in focus groups and did not receive any intervention. In the feasibility study, all participants received the adapted mobile CBT. Participants were also assigned to active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using an ABAB design within racial/ethnic groups (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Experimental: Interview
Participants attend virtual meetings and virtual focus groups during the cultural adaptation phase. Feedback is collected and analyzed to develop the finalized adaptation.
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Cultural Adaptation
STARTED
38
0
0
Cultural Adaptation
COMPLETED
38
0
0
Cultural Adaptation
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
Feasibility Study
STARTED
0
15
18
Feasibility Study
COMPLETED
0
14
16
Feasibility Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
1
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Experimental: Interview
Participants attend virtual meetings and virtual focus groups during the cultural adaptation phase. Feedback is collected and analyzed to develop the finalized adaptation.
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Feasibility Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
2

Baseline Characteristics

Culturally Adapted Mobile Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adolescent Survivors of Pediatric Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Experimental: Interview
n=38 Participants
Participants attend virtual meetings and virtual focus groups during the cultural adaptation phase. Feedback is collected and analyzed to develop the finalized adaptation.
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Total
n=68 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
25.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.12 • n=41 Participants
14.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17 • n=1581 Participants
13.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.18 • n=4626 Participants
20.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97 • n=72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
n=41 Participants
9 Participants
n=1581 Participants
8 Participants
n=4626 Participants
43 Participants
n=72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants
n=41 Participants
5 Participants
n=1581 Participants
8 Participants
n=4626 Participants
25 Participants
n=72 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
20 Participants
n=41 Participants
5 Participants
n=1581 Participants
5 Participants
n=4626 Participants
30 Participants
n=72 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
5 Participants
n=1581 Participants
6 Participants
n=4626 Participants
11 Participants
n=72 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
n=41 Participants
4 Participants
n=1581 Participants
5 Participants
n=4626 Participants
27 Participants
n=72 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 Participants
n=41 Participants
14 Participants
n=1581 Participants
16 Participants
n=4626 Participants
68 Participants
n=72 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed both the baseline and 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

Efficacy of mobile CBT paired with active versus sham tDCS on pain intensity in adolescent survivors with chronic pain. The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI) includes a 4-item pain severity scale. Participants rate their worst and least pain in the last 24 hours, average pain, and current pain using a 10-point rating scale (0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). The pain severity score was calculated as the average of the 4 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Changes in pain intensity from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Pain Intensity
-0.96 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
-0.56 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

Efficacy of mobile CBT paired with active versus sham tDCS on pain interference in adolescent survivors with chronic pain. Using the BPI, participants rate the impact of pain on general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work/school, relationships with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life using a 10-point rating scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). The pain interference score was calculated as the average of the 7 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference. Changes in pain interference from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Pain Interference
-0.60 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
-1.30 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Child version (PCS-C) is a 13-item self-report measure of overly negative attitudes of pain. It consists of three scales of rumination, magnification and helplessness. The measure uses a 5-point rating scale (0=not at all true to 4=very true). The scores of three subscales were calculated as the sum of specific items: Rumination (4 items; score range 0-16), Magnification (3 items; score range 0-12), and Helplessness (6 items; score range 0-24). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 13 items (score range 0-52). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e., more pain rumination, magnification, helplessness and overall pain catastrophizing). Changes in pain catastrophizing from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Pain Catastrophizing
Rumination
-0.07 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.95
-1.13 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.96
Pain Catastrophizing
Magnification
-0.64 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.31
-0.69 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
Pain Catastrophizing
Helplessness
1.07 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.91
-1.81 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.27
Pain Catastrophizing
Total score
0.36 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.69
-3.63 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.02

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information (PROMIS) Pediatric Depressive Symptoms is an 8-item measure of self-reported symptoms of low mood in children and adolescents over the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Changes in depressive symptoms from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Depression
-0.65 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 9.43
-3.13 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 13.30

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety is an 8-item measure of self-reported symptoms of anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents over the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms. Changes in anxiety symptoms from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Anxiety
-3.82 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 7.51
-2.01 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 10.36

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. One participant with incomplete data on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory was excluded from the analysis.

The Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory is a 9-item measure developed specifically for survivors of childhood cancer (8-18 years) to assess the presence of fear of recurrence and perceived risk recurrence. The measure has 5-point rating scale (0=Not at All to 4=A Great Deal). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 9 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 36. Higher scores indicate greater cancer-related worry. Changes in cancer-related worry symptoms from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=15 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Cancer-related Worry
3.64 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.69
-4.13 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.51

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Mobility is an 8-item measure of self-reported ability at physical activities in children and adolescents in the past 7 days. The PROMIS Pediatric Upper Extremity is an 8-item measure of self-upper extremity function in the past 7 days. Both measures have a 5-point rating scale (No Trouble to Not Able to Do). For both measures, the PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate better outcomes (i.e., greater mobility and upper extremity function, respectively). Changes in physical functioning from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Physical Functioning
Mobility
0.34 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 3.50
4.03 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 9.47
Physical Functioning
Upper extremity
1.94 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 3.50
0.42 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 6.48

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Peer Relationship is an 8-item measure that assesses the quality of peer relationships. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate better quality relationships with peers. Changes in peer relationship quality from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Peer Relations
-1.64 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 5.92
-3.26 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 10.69

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Fatigue is a 10-item measure that assesses symptoms of fatigue in the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Changes in fatigue from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Fatigue
-2.72 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 9.92
-2.86 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 10.14

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. One participant with incomplete data on the Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) short form was excluded from the analysis.

The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) short form is a 10-item measure of behavioral sleep patterns in adolescents. The measure has a 6-point rating scale (1=Never to 6=Always). The total score was calculated as the average of the 10 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 6. Higher scores indicating better success of sleep quality. Changes in sleep from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=15 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sleep (Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS))
-0.20 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
0.61 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis for the PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep-Related Impairment 8-item measure to allow for assessment of sleep quality during the night as well as the impact of sleepiness on daytime function. This measure assesses sleep-related impairment over the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate more sleep problems. Changes in sleep from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sleep (PROMIS Sleep-related Impairment)
-0.51 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 6.58
-2.76 Change in T-scores
Standard Deviation 9.72

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

Acceptability and satisfaction with treatment will be assessed using a 5-point numerical rating scale (NRS) (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher score indicates greater acceptability and satisfaction. The answers were categorized as agree yes (strongly agree or agree) versus no (neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Global Acceptability and Satisfaction With Treatment
Acceptable treatment: Yes (strongly agree or agree)
3 Participants
10 Participants
Global Acceptability and Satisfaction With Treatment
Acceptable treatment: No (neither agree or disagree, disagree, strongly disagree)
11 Participants
6 Participants
Global Acceptability and Satisfaction With Treatment
Positive experience with the treatment: Yes (strongly agree or agree)
8 Participants
12 Participants
Global Acceptability and Satisfaction With Treatment
Positive experience with the treatment: No (neither agree or disagree, disagree, strongly disagree)
6 Participants
4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. All participants were included in the analysis.

At each timepoint participants and/or their parents will be asked to list the names of their medications, doses taken, and the frequency with which the medications were taken over the past 2 weeks. Opioid doses will be converted to morphine equivalent doses (MED; in mg) using an opioid equivalence table. Changes in opioid use from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported. Note: no participants reported taking opioids during the study

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Opioid Use
0 mg-morphine equivalents (MME)
Standard Deviation 0
0 mg-morphine equivalents (MME)
Standard Deviation 0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. One participant with incomplete data on the Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8) was excluded from the analysis.

Parental depression will be measured at each time point using the Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8), a measure of symptoms of major depressive disorder. The Patient Health Questionnaire is a 4-point rating scale (0=Not at All to 3=Nearly Every Day). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 8 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 24. Higher scores indicate greater depression. . Changes in parental depression from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=13 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Parental Depression
-2.00 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
-1.19 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Population: Include participants in the feasibility study who were assigned to an experimental arm and completed the 6-week assessment. Two participants with incomplete data on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) were excluded from the analysis.

Parental anxiety will be measured at each time point using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), a measure of symptoms of generalized anxiety. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder measure is a 4-point rating scale (0=Not at 3=All to Nearly Every Day). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 7 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Changes in parental anxiety from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=14 Participants
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Parental Anxiety
-0.93 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.08
-1.14 Change in scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35

Adverse Events

Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Experimental: Interview

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Experimental: Arm I (Mobile CBT + Active tDCS)
n=14 participants at risk
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Mobile CBT + Sham tDCS)
n=16 participants at risk
Participants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Experimental: Interview
n=38 participants at risk
Participants attend virtual meetings and virtual focus groups during the cultural adaptation phase. Feedback is collected and analyzed to develop the finalized adaptation.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Increased perspiration
0.00%
0/14 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 12 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching
64.3%
9/14 • Number of events 47 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
56.2%
9/16 • Number of events 27 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
0.00%
0/14 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Tingling
71.4%
10/14 • Number of events 60 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
87.5%
14/16 • Number of events 71 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Burning sensation
50.0%
7/14 • Number of events 21 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
43.8%
7/16 • Number of events 31 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/14 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Redness
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 13 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 4 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pain
42.9%
6/14 • Number of events 18 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 7 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
57.1%
8/14 • Number of events 19 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
43.8%
7/16 • Number of events 22 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 7 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 3 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/16 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Eye disorders
Blurred vision
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 3 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ringing in ears
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 7 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 4 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Poor concentration
35.7%
5/14 • Number of events 6 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 6 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Restlessness
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Fatigue
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 2 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 6 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Decreased energy
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 4 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Drowsiness
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 6 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
General disorders
Other
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 5 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.
0.00%
0/38 • In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were self-reported by participants at any point during the study phase, up to 2 months. In the feasibility study, adverse events based on current symptoms were surveyed prior to the first stimulation session and then twice per week, at the end of each stimulation session, for the 6 weeks of the intervention.
In the cultural adaptation phase, adverse events were collected through non-systematic assessments. In the feasibility study, adverse events were systematically assessed. Adverse events were described as either tolerable or distressing by participants. If a participant reported an adverse event at the first stimulation session, any subsequent adverse event of the same intensity (tolerable or distressing) did not contribute towards the counting of new adverse events.

Additional Information

Tara Brinkman, PhD

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Phone: 1-866-278-5833

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place