Trial Outcomes & Findings for PureWick™ France and U.S. At-Home Pilot Study (NCT NCT05710718)

Potential subjects were identified and enrolled by the participating clinical research sites.

All enrolled participants were randomized to a treatment assignment; however, four (4) participants discontinued prior to starting treatment. The number of Started participants (13) represents those participants that were randomized and treated.

PureWick™ France and U.S. At-Home Pilot Study

Capture rate following void (captured as % of urine captured by device and collected in canister, measured by weight). Prior to each nightly use, the weight of the empty urine collection canister and the weight of a dry absorbent pad are collected. Participants use the device overnight while sleeping with the absorbent pad underneath them. The next morning, the post-void weight of the urine collection canister and the post-void weight of the absorbent pad are collected. Capture rate is calculated as the weight of captured urine (post-void canister weight - pre-void canister weight) / total urine volume (captured urine (post-void canister weight - pre-void canister weight) + leaked urine (post-void pad weight - pre-void pad weight)) \* 100. The primary efficacy endpoint of urine capture rate is derived by computing the mean of daily capture rate during each study phase.

Draize Scale is a 5 point scale where 0 is no erythema, edema, or bleeding and 4 is severe erythema, edema, and/or bleeding. The primary safety endpoint of skin irritation score is derived by computing the mean of Draize Scale scores assessed daily during each study phase.

N-QOL is a standardized tool used to explore 13 items that might be affected by nocturia (e.g., concentration, productiveness, and low energy). Transformed Total Score is computed from the core 12 item summary scores and ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 4a consists of 4 questions that each have 5 response options, with 1 indicating the least sleep disturbance and 5 indicating the most sleep disturbance. Total raw scores are translated into a T-score ranging from 32.0 to 73.3, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

Participant's tolerability is determined by the number of days of actual device use.

Overall comfort on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1- 5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Uncomfortable, 2 = Uncomfortable, 3 = Neither Comfortable nor Uncomfortable, 4 = Comfortable, and 5 = Very Comfortable. The last question related to likelihood to recommend the device ranged from 1-5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Unlikely, 2 = Unlikely, 3 = Neither Likely nor Unlikely, 4 = Likely, and 5 = Very Likely.

Ease of use score on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1- 5 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Very Difficult, 2 = Somewhat Difficult, 3 = Average Difficulty, 4 = Somewhat Easy, and 5 = Very Easy. The last question related to dryness experienced with the device during sleep ranged from 1-4 with higher scores indicating a better outcome, where 1 = Never Dry, 2 = Sometimes Dry, 3 = Usually Dry, 4 = Always dry to mostly always dry