Trial Outcomes & Findings for Real World Evidence Study on Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the Pirkanmaa Hospital District in Finland (NCT NCT05701007)
NCT ID: NCT05701007
Last Updated: 2026-01-29
Results Overview
BMI is a measurement of a person's leanness or corpulence based on their height and weight, and is intended to quantify tissue mass. It is widely used as a general indicator of whether a participant has a healthy body weight for their height. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
COMPLETED
1083 participants
3 months before index date (closest value); retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 months
2026-01-29
Participant Flow
Eligible participants aged \>=18 years who were diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)- metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and/or metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between 01-Jan-2014 and 31-Dec-2022 (approximately 9 years) were identified from Pirkanmaa Hospital District (PHD) data records and their data were included in this study.
Available data from eligible participants was evaluated in approximately 14 months (study start date: 13-Feb-2023 to study completion date:10-Apr-2024) of this retrospective, observational study as per its objectives.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mPC
Eligible participants with mPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1083
|
|
Overall Study
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
|
795
|
|
Overall Study
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
|
558
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1083
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mPC
n=1083 Participants
Eligible participants with mPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
mCSPC
|
73.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=795 Participants • Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
|
|
Age, Continuous
mCRPC
|
75.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=558 Participants • Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
mCSPC · Female
|
0 Participants
n=795 Participants • Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
mCSPC · Male
|
795 Participants
n=795 Participants • Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
mCRPC · Female
|
0 Participants
n=558 Participants • Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
mCRPC · Male
|
558 Participants
n=558 Participants • Participants were not exclusive in mCSPC and mCRPC cohorts.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months before index date (closest value); retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
BMI is a measurement of a person's leanness or corpulence based on their height and weight, and is intended to quantify tissue mass. It is widely used as a general indicator of whether a participant has a healthy body weight for their height. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=228 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=149 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
27.9 Kilogram per meter square
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
27.1 Kilogram per meter square
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months before index date (closest value); retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
PSA is a protein produced by the prostate gland, and the PSA test measures its levels in the blood. It is primarily used to screen for prostate cancer and monitor participants after treatment. Elevated PSA levels may indicate prostate cancer or other prostate abnormalities. Common prostate abnormalities include benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, prostate cancer. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=487 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=514 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
|
199.7 Nanogram per milliliter
Standard Deviation 704.7
|
92 Nanogram per milliliter
Standard Deviation 396.4
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months before index date (closest value); retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=338 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=457 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Alkaline Phosphatase (P-AFOS)
|
214.1 Units per liter
Standard Deviation 402.3
|
144 Units per liter
Standard Deviation 221.8
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Length of Follow-up
|
1.8 Years
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
1.9 Years
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 2 months from index date; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
The new metastasis was defined based on the prostate cancer diagnosis dates within 2 months from the index date. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to metastatic castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered new CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With de Novo Metastasis
|
444 Participants
|
240 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Number of participants who received treatment for mCRPC and mCSPC were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Treatment for mCRPC and mCSPC
|
668 Participants
|
536 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Only reporting arm "Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC" is reported as this outcome measure was to be analyzed for participants who had mCSPC and they progressed to mCRPC.
Number of participants initially diagnosed With mCSPC who progressed into mCRPC were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC Who Progressed to mCRPC
|
270 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Closest record any time from index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Number of participants with orchiectomy done were reported in this outcome measure. Orchiectomy is a surgical procedure in which one or both testicles are removed. It is commonly performed to treat or prevent prostate cancer from spreading. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Orchiectomy
|
10 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Number of participants with palliative radiology done were reported in this outcome measure. This is a treatment designed to alleviate symptoms caused by advanced cancer, rather than cure the disease. It is commonly used to reduce tumor size or provide relief from pain, bleeding, or obstructions, ultimately enhancing the participant's quality of life. It is especially beneficial for participants with cancers that cannot be cured, offering relief from distressing symptoms such as tumor compression on organs or bones, as well as severe pain. Palliative radiology is analyzed based on procedure code (WF049). Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Undergone Palliative Radiology
|
222 Participants
|
187 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
SSRE was defined as bone instability related to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer or due to the spread of prostate cancer to the bone (metastases). Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Skeletal-Related Event (SSRE)
|
44 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Number of participants with osteoporosis were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Osteoporosis
|
9 Participants
|
NA Participants
According to the guidelines set by the Finnish Health and Social Data Permit Authority (Findata), results having less than 5 participants with events cannot be exported from Findata data servers due to participant privacy restrictions.
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Number of participants who were on bone medication (denosumab, zoledronic acid) were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were on Bone Medication
|
154 Participants
|
292 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Number of participants who were on opioids (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, methadone, hydromorphone) were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were on Opioids
|
310 Participants
|
332 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 5 years before the index date (index date included); retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
CCI score range was from 0 to 14, where 0= low comorbid condition and 14= high comorbid condition, higher scores indicated more comorbidity. CCI was reported based on comorbidities reported 5 years before the index (index date included). Participants with grade 4 or more than 4 were combined and presented to avoid risk of re-identification of participants. Only those categories are reported which had at least 1 participant data in any of the reporting group. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Scores
0 level
|
548 Participants
|
329 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Scores
1 level
|
147 Participants
|
142 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Scores
2 level
|
61 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Scores
3 level
|
25 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Scores
4+ level
|
14 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Closest record any time from index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approx.14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
Gleason score is used to grade tumors based upon its microscopic appearance. Gleason scores range from 1 (low-grade cancer) to 10 (high-grade cancer). Low grade prostate cancer grows more slowly than high-grade cancer and is less likely to spread (metastasize). Scores from 3-5 have been combined to avoid risk of re-identification of participants. Only those categories are reported which had at least 1 participant data in any of the reporting group. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
3-5
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
6
|
46 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
7
|
171 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
8
|
100 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
9
|
369 Participants
|
286 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
10
|
48 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Classified Per Gleason Score
Missing
|
54 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Closest record during 3 months before or after the index date; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
T categories: T1, T2, T3, T4; In this, T describes the size of the tumor and any spread of cancer into nearby tissue. Numbers after the T (such as T1, T2, T3, and T4) describe tumor size and/or amount of spread into nearby structures. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC). Higher numbers indicate greater the tumor size.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=178 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=70 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: T
TNM (T): T1
|
13 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: T
TNM (T): T1-T2
|
0 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: T
TNM (T): T2
|
28 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: T
TNM (T): T3
|
81 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: T
TNM (T): T4
|
56 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Closest record during 3 months before or after the index date; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
N categories: N0, N1, N2, NX. N describes spread of cancer to nearby lymph nodes. Numbers after the N (such as N0, N1, N2, NX) describe tumor size and/or amount of spread into nearby structures. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC). Higher numbers indicate greater the tumor size and spread into nearby lymph nodes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=112 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=42 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: N
TNM(N): N0
|
41 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: N
TNM(N): N1
|
65 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: N
TNM(N): N1-N2
|
0 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: N
TNM(N): N2-N3
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Closest record during 3 months before or after the index date; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
M categories: M0, M1. M describes metastasis (spread of cancer to other parts of the body). Numbers after the M (such as M0, M1) describe tumor size and/or amount of spread into nearby structures. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC). Higher numbers indicate greater the tumor size and spread into nearby body parts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=163 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=65 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: M
TNM(M): M1
|
113 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification: M
TNM(M): M0
|
50 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Closest record during 3 months before or after the index date; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data.
ECOG PS is a scale to assess a participant's disease status. 0 = fully active, able to carry out all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light nature; 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities. up and about \> 50% of waking hours; 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair \> 50% of waking hours; 4 = completely disabled, confined to bed or chair; 5 = dead. Only those categories are reported which had at least 1 participant data in any of the reporting group. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=469 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=303 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
0
|
175 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
1
|
181 Participants
|
112 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
2
|
64 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
3
|
38 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
3-4
|
0 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
4
|
11 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. Only reporting arm "Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC" is reported as this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for this group.
Number of participants according to treatment per treatment line (first, second, third and fourth line) for mPC for mCSPC participants were reported in this outcome measure. Palliative care was analyzed based on International Classification of Diseases- 10th revision (ICD-10) code Z51.5. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=668 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Palliative care
|
60 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Apalutamide
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Bicalutamide
|
60 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Degarelix
|
244 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Docetaxel
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Goserelin
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Leuprorelin
|
175 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Triptorelin
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First line: Other
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
First Line: Unknown
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Palliative care
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Apalutamide
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Bicalutamide
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Degarelix
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Docetaxel
|
89 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Goserelin
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Leuprorelin
|
50 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Triptorelin
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second line: Other
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second Line: EOF
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second Line: Death
|
98 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Second Line: Unknown
|
145 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Palliative care
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Apalutamide
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Docetaxel
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Leuprorelin
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Triptorelin
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Other
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: EOF
|
87 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Death
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Third Line: Unknown
|
104 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Fourth Line: Palliative care/Unknown
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Fourth Line: EOF
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Fourth Line: Death
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCSPC Participants
Fourth Line: Other
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. Only reporting arm "Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC" is reported as this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for this group.
Number of participants according to treatment per treatment line (first, second, third and, fourth, and fifth line) for mPC for mCRPC participants were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=536 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Apalutamide
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Palliative care
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Abiraterone
|
77 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Bicalutamide
|
59 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Degarelix
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Docetaxel
|
55 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Enzalutamide
|
190 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Flutamide
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First line: Goserelin
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First Line: Leuprorelin
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First Line: Radium-223
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
First Line: Other
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Palliative care
|
73 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Abiraterone
|
65 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Bicalutamide
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Cabazitaxel
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Docetaxel
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Enzalutamide
|
90 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Flutamide
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Radium-223
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second line: Other
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second Line: EOF
|
123 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Second Line: Death
|
76 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Palliative care
|
59 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Abiraterone
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Bicalutamide
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Cabazitaxel
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Docetaxel
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Enzalutamide
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Radium-223
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Other
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third LIne: EOF
|
56 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Third Line: Death
|
97 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Palliative care
|
44 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Abiraterone
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Cabazitaxel
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Docetaxel
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Enzalutamide
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Radium-223
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Other
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: EOF
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fourth Line: Death
|
71 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fifth Line: Palliative care
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fifth Line: Cabazitaxel
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fifth Line: Other
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fifth Line: EOF
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants According to Treatment Per Treatment Line for mPC: mCRPC Participants
Fifth Line: Death
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified rows.
OS was defined as time from index until death (event) or end of study identification 31-Dec-2022 (censoring event). Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Treated Participants
|
52.6 Months
Interval 47.1 to 63.7
|
27.6 Months
Interval 24.1 to 30.7
|
—
|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Untreated Participants
|
12.2 Months
Interval 6.5 to 20.0
|
4.2 Months
Interval 1.2 to 9.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From initiation of current treatment line until initiation of next treatment line, death censoring event, whichever occurred first, maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study.
TTNT was defined as time from initiation of the current treatment line until the initiation of the next treatment line (event), death (event), or end of study identification 31-Dec-2022 (censoring event). Data for first, second, third, fourth and fifth line treatment line was provided in this outcome measure. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=644 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=536 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
First Line
|
9.9 Months
Interval 8.2 to 13.2
|
10.3 Months
Interval 8.4 to 12.1
|
—
|
|
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Second Line
|
33.1 Months
Interval 18.9 to
Median and 95%CI could not be estimated due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
6.6 Months
Interval 5.5 to 7.7
|
—
|
|
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Third Line
|
NA Months
Median and 95%CI could not be estimated due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
4.0 Months
Interval 3.4 to 5.1
|
—
|
|
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Fourth Line
|
NA Months
Median and 95%CI could not be estimated due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
4.1 Months
Interval 3.1 to 5.3
|
—
|
|
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Fifth Line
|
—
|
NA Months
Median and 95%CI could not be estimated due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From mCSPC index until mCRPC index, death or censoring event, whichever occurred first, maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data. Only reporting arm "Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC" is reported as this outcome measure was to be analyzed for participants who had mCSPC and they progressed to mCRPC.
Time to disease progression was defined as time from mCSPC index until mCRPC index (event), death (competing event) or end of study identification period (31-December-2022; censoring event). Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=270 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Disease Progression
|
19.4 Months
Interval 17.3 to 22.0
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From mCSPC index until mCRPC index, death or censoring event, whichever occurred first, maximum up to 24 months; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Analysis excluded participants with missing data. Only reporting arm "Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC" is reported as this outcome measure was to be analyzed for participants who had mCSPC and they progressed to mCRPC.
Factors associated with disease progression to castration resistant included age, CCI, De nova mPC and Gleason score. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=257 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Age: 70 to 80
|
101 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Age: >80
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Age: <70
|
111 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
CCI: 0
|
186 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
CCI: 1
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
CCI: 2+
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
De novo mPC: No
|
77 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
De novo mPC: Yes
|
180 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Gleason score: 3 to 6
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Gleason score: 7
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Gleason score: 8
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Per Factors Associated With Disease Progression to Castration Resistant
Gleason score: 9 to 10
|
188 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx.9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population: eligible participants whose data were included, observed for evaluation. Here,'Number Analyzed'=participants evaluable for specified rows,for 'Participants Diagnosed with mCRPC' arm for 'untreated' categories for each year = '0' as number of untreated participants were less, when distributed across specified years = \<5. According to Findata guidelines, results having \<5 participants with events cannot be exported from Findata servers due to participant privacy restrictions.
Incidence was calculated by dividing the number of incident participants each year (2014-2022) by the yearly size of background population in PHD. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC). In this outcome measure for arms mCSPC and mCRPC only those participants are reported who were classified or recorded as mCSPC and mCRPC in specified year. All participants reported under Overall Cohort mPC might not have been recognized/classified/recorded as mCSPC and mCRPC for the specified year, hence sum of participants reported against mCSPC and mCRPC might be less than the participants reported for mPC for that specified year.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=1083 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=795 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=558 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2017: Untreated
|
1.75 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
2.14 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2018: Treated
|
18.94 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
11.6 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
11.4 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2018: Untreated
|
3.09 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
3.48 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2019: Treated
|
21.93 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
16.16 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
13.27 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2019: Untreated
|
3.27 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
2.69 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2020: Treated
|
28.12 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
20.27 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
15.49 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2020: Untreated
|
1.91 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
1.53 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2021: Treated
|
20.85 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
16.11 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
14.41 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2021: Untreated
|
2.65 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
2.27 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2022: Treated
|
19.9 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
17.08 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
11.08 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2022: Untreated
|
3.94 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
3.57 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2014: Treated
|
16.81 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
10.48 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
5.73 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2014: Untreated
|
2.57 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
2.97 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2015: Treated
|
18.09 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
12.59 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
8.06 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2015: Untreated
|
2.56 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
2.36 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2016: Treated
|
20.52 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
11.92 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
10.36 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2016: Untreated
|
3.13 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
3.52 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
—
|
|
Annual Incidence of mPC, mCSPC and mCRPC
2017: Treated
|
18.86 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
12.44 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
12.64 Number of new cases per 1000 person year
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx. 9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Number of events per participant year for outpatient clinic contacts, hospitalization contacts were reported in this outcome measure. Index date for (i) mCSPC participants were defined as date for the first record of mPC (ii) mCRPC participants were defined as date for progression to castration resistant (if =3 months from castration-sensitive treatment initiation \[1st control usually at 3 months\], considered de novo CRPC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=668 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=532 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Events Per Participant Year for Outpatient Clinic Contacts, Hospitalization Contacts
Outpatient Clinic Contacts
|
14.2 Events per participant per year
Interval 13.2 to 15.4
|
18.6 Events per participant per year
Interval 17.3 to 20.1
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Per Participant Year for Outpatient Clinic Contacts, Hospitalization Contacts
Hospitalization Contacts
|
0.7 Events per participant per year
Interval 0.6 to 0.7
|
1.2 Events per participant per year
Interval 1.0 to 1.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From index date to end of follow-up date [death or end of identification 31-Dec-2022, whichever occurred first], maximum up to approx. 9 years; retrospective available data evaluated in this study for approximately 14 monthsPopulation: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were included and observed for evaluation in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Number of days per participant year for hospital inpatient days were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
n=668 Participants
Eligible participants with mCSPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
n=532 Participants
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Eligible participants with mCRPC and whose data were evaluated retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days Per Participant Year for Hospital Inpatient Days
|
3.1 Days per participant year
Interval 2.6 to 3.6
|
6.5 Days per participant year
Interval 5.7 to 7.4
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Participants Diagnosed With mCSPC
Participants Diagnosed With mCRPC
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER