Combination Topical Cysteamine and Fractional 1927nm Low-Powered Diode Laser for Treatment of Facial Melasma
NCT05656833 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2022-12-19
Summary
The primary objective of our study is to determine the efficacy of combined topical cysteamine cream with a 1927 diode non-ablative laser (Clear + Brilliant Permea®; Solta Medical, Inc.), compared to topical cysteamine (Cyspera) alone in the treatment of melasma.
The main questions it aims to answer are
* If melasma treatment with topical cysteamine cream is more effective when used with the Clear \& Brilliant® Permea laser
* The safety \& efficacy of melasma treatment in various skin types using the Clear \& Brilliantt® Permea laser in combination with topical cysteamine.
Participants will
* Come into our office for an initial screening appointment to determine if participant is eligible for the study
* Come in for 3 laser treatments, 4 weeks apart, on 1 side of the face
* Use the study provided Cyspera topical cream every day on the entire face for the 12 weeks on the study.
Researchers will compare the side of the participants face not treated with laser to the side of the face treated with laser. The participants will be using Cyspera on both sides of their face.
Conditions
- Melasma
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Fractional 1927nm Low-Powered Diode Laser
Clear \& Brilliant Permea® Laser used on the side of the face randomized to receive laser
- OTHER
-
Topical Cysteamine
Topical Cysteamine cream will be used on the entire face.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Solta Medical
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Skin of Color Society
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Scientis
collaborator UNKNOWN -
UnionDerm
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 74 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-10-28
- Primary Completion
- 2023-04-30
- Completion
- 2023-07-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser and Intradermal Tranexamic Acid for Melasma
NCT03008655 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma
NCT06278948 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Light Treatment and Laser Treatment for Melasma
NCT00509977 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fractional Erbium YAG Laser vs Intradermal and Systemic Tranexamic Acid
NCT06522984 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Acid Peel and Laser for the Treatment of Melasma
NCT00467233 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Topical Composition Therapy (2013-MCN-333) for the Treatment of Melasma
NCT02730819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Pilot Study Testing 1064nm Q-switch Laser Versus Glycolic Acid Peels for the Treatment of Melasma
NCT01976273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Q- Switched Nd:YAG Laser Alone in Melasma
NCT04765930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cysteamine Compared to Hydroquinone in Melasma
NCT05969587 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Fractional co2 Laser Followed by Either Vitamin c or Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.
NCT05911698 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Therapy of Photoelectric Instruments and Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Pigmentary Disorders
NCT06911281 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Efficacy and Safety of Using Combination of 755-nm Picosecond Alexandrite Laser and 2% Hydroquinone Compared With 2% Hydroquinone Alone for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Split-face Controlled Trial
NCT04597203 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Tranexamic Acid and Laser for Treatment of Melasma
NCT03686787 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in the Treatment of Melasma
NCT06677931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fractional Photothermolysis for Treating Melasma
NCT01245881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tranexamic Acid vs. Combination With Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Melasma
NCT03899233 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Split-face Study Comparing the Cosmetic Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Topical Products in Participants With Moderate Facial Melasma
NCT02977507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment w/ Tri-Luma® Cream & Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) vs a Mild Inactive Control Cream & Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in Melasma
NCT00669071 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Serum Containing Melasyl™, 10% Niacinamide, Hyaluronic Acid, and HEPES
NCT07121439 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Photoaging Reversing After Picosecond Laser With DLA Assessed by Cellular Resolution OCT in Asian Patient With Melasma
NCT04602819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microneedle and Trichloroaceticacid in Treatment of Melasma
NCT03472235 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety Between 4% Hydroquinone Cream With or Without Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm Laser for the Treatment of Dermal or Mixed Type Melasma
NCT03049059 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of 1550nm Fractional Laser Alone Versus in Combination With Microneedling for the Treatment of Acne Scars
NCT03901417 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Topical Metformin Versus Topical Ketotifen in Melasma Treatment
NCT06942390 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Clinical Observation of 1064-nm Q-Switched Fractional Laser Combined With Oral Tranexamic Acid on Treating of Melasma.
NCT03963466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA