Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Research Study to See How Semaglutide Helps People With Excess Weight and Type 2 Diabetes Lose Weight (NCT NCT05649137)
NCT ID: NCT05649137
Last Updated: 2026-04-27
Results Overview
Relative change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
512 participants
Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)
2026-04-27
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 68 sites in 8 countries.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
307
|
103
|
102
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
|
307
|
103
|
102
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
307
|
103
|
102
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
295
|
100
|
96
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
3
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Unspecified reason
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Research Study to See How Semaglutide Helps People With Excess Weight and Type 2 Diabetes Lose Weight
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=103 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=102 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Total
n=512 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
291 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
483 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=226 Participants
|
58 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=240 Participants
|
55 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=236 Participants
|
56 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=702 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
166 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
265 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
141 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
247 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
19 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
5 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
22 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
258 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
428 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=226 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=240 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=236 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=702 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Relative change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Relative Change in Body Weight
|
-10.7 Percentage (%) change in body weight
Standard Deviation 8.1
|
-4.0 Percentage (%) change in body weight
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
-13.5 Percentage (%) change in body weight
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 72Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieve body weight reduction \>=5% is presented. Yes defines participants who achieved body weight reduction \>= 5% and No defines participants who did not achieve body weight reduction \>=5%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
73 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
251 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% (Yes/no)
No
|
24 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 72Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure
Number of participants who achieve body weight reduction \>=10% is presented. Yes defines participants who achieved body weight reduction greater than or equal to 10% and No defines participants who did not achieve body weight reduction greater than or equal to 10%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction >= 10% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
50 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
183 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction >= 10% (Yes/no)
No
|
47 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
108 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 72Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieve body weight reduction \>=15% is presented. Yes defines participants who achieved body weight reduction greater than or equal to 15% and No defines participants who did not achieve body weight reduction greater than or equal to 15%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction >= 15% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
28 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
120 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction >= 15% (Yes/no)
No
|
69 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
171 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 72Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieve body weight reduction \>=20% is presented. Yes defines participants who achieved body weight reduction greater than or equal to 20% and No defines participants who did not achieve body weight reduction greater than or equal to 20%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction >= 20% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
14 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Reduction >= 20% (Yes/no)
No
|
83 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
229 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in waist circumference from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Waist Circumference
|
-10.6 Centimeters (cm)
Standard Deviation 8.4
|
-6.5 Centimeters (cm)
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
-12.6 Centimeters (cm)
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=96 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=288 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
-1.7 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.3 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-1.8 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Weight
|
-11.4 Kilograms (kg)
Standard Deviation 8.9
|
-4.6 Kilograms (kg)
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
-14.9 Kilograms (kg)
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in BMI from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
-4.1 kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
-1.6 kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-5.3 kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
|
-7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15
|
-3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13
|
-8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=97 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=291 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
|
-3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10
|
-3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9
|
-3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in total cholesterol in mmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=94 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Cholesterol (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.1
|
0.97 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.3
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in total cholesterol in mg/dL from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=94 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Cholesterol (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.1
|
0.97 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.3
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in HDL cholesterol in mmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=285 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L) - Ratio to Baseline
|
1.06 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5
|
1.07 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.1
|
1.10 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in HDL cholesterol in mg/dL from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=285 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) - Ratio to Baseline
|
1.06 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5
|
1.07 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.1
|
1.10 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in LDL cholesterol in mmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=285 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.95 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.5
|
0.97 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.4
|
0.99 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in LDL cholesterol in mg/dL from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=285 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.95 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.5
|
0.97 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.4
|
0.99 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in VLDL cholesterol in mmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=94 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=93 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Very-low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.81 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.4
|
0.90 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.8
|
0.72 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in VLDL cholesterol in mg/dL from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=94 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=93 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in VLDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.81 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.4
|
0.90 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.8
|
0.72 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in triglycerides in mmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=94 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.80 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.2
|
0.87 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.4
|
0.71 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in triglycerides in mg/dL from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=94 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Triglycerides (mg/dL) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.80 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.2
|
0.87 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.4
|
0.71 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in free fatty acids in mmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=284 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.81 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.6
|
0.98 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.8
|
0.74 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 69.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in free fatty acids in mg/dL from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=284 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Free Fatty Acids (mg/dL) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.81 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.6
|
0.98 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.8
|
0.74 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 69.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in hsCRP in mg/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=95 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=95 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.48 Ratio of hsCRP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 121.1
|
0.82 Ratio of hsCRP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 96.0
|
0.47 Ratio of hsCRP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 166.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=93 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=93 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=281 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose
|
-58.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 46.3
|
-20.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 68.7
|
-59.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 53.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in fasting serum insulin in pmol/L from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=281 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Serum Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L]) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.90 Ratio of fasting serum insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.6
|
0.87 Ratio of fasting serum insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.4
|
0.77 Ratio of fasting serum insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in fasting serum insulin in mIU/ml from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) as ratio to baseline is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=91 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=281 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Serum Insulin (Milliinternational Units Per Milliliter [mIU/mL]) - Ratio to Baseline
|
0.90 Ratio of fasting serum insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.6
|
0.87 Ratio of fasting serum insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.4
|
0.77 Ratio of fasting serum insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 72Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Number of participants with HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at week 72 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=96 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=288 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0 % (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol])
|
75 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
235 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 72Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Number of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at week 72 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=96 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=94 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=288 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)
|
64 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
209 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 81Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP.
Number of AEs is reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally associated with the use of investigational medicinal product (IMP), whether or not considered related to the IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=102 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg Versus Placebo: Number of Adverse Events (AEs)
|
253 Events
|
—
|
1581 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 81Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP.
Number of SAEs is reported. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=102 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg Versus Placebo: Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
21 Events
|
—
|
39 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), End of treatment (week 72)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. Overall number of participants analyzed = Participants with available data for the outcome measure.
Change in pulse from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 72) is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=84 Participants
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=271 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pulse
|
2 Beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Deviation 10
|
-4 Beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Deviation 9
|
1 Beats per minute (bpm)
Standard Deviation 10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 81Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP.
Number of treatment emergent severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=102 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg Versus Placebo: Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
1 Episodes
|
—
|
0 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 81Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP.
Number of AEs is reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally associated with the use of IMP, whether or not considered related to the IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=103 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg Versus Semaglutide 2.4 mg: Number of AEs
|
508 Events
|
—
|
1581 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 81Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP.
Number of SAEs is reported. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=103 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg Versus Semaglutide 2.4 mg: Number of SAEs
|
35 Events
|
—
|
39 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 81Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP.
Number of treatment emergent severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=103 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 Participants
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide 7.2 mg Versus Semaglutide 2.4 mg: Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
0 Episodes
|
—
|
0 Episodes
|
Adverse Events
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 participants at risk
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=103 participants at risk
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=102 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute left ventricular failure
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.65%
2/307 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma of colon
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.65%
2/307 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Anginal equivalent
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankylosing spondylitis
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 7 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Azotaemia
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Bell's palsy
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.65%
2/307 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral small vessel ischaemic disease
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic mass
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperammonaemia
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperphosphataemia
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intervertebral disc injury
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Iridocyclitis
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Joint abscess
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver injury
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular oedema
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum deviation
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Optic neuritis
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteolysis
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian adenoma
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian cancer stage III
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Postmenopausal haemorrhage
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Toxic encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Facial paralysis
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus paralytic
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Nodal rhythm
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.33%
1/307 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/103 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Varicose vein
|
0.00%
0/307 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.97%
1/103 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Semaglutide 7.2 mg
n=307 participants at risk
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 milligrams \[mg\]) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 7.2 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
n=103 participants at risk
Participants received escalated dose of semaglutide s.c. (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7 and 2.4 mg) once weekly for 20 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of semaglutide 2.4 mg s.c. once weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=102 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo to semaglutide s.c. once a week for 72 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.2%
16/307 • Number of events 19 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Number of events 4 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.2%
16/307 • Number of events 21 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Number of events 4 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
3.9%
4/102 • Number of events 4 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.5%
17/307 • Number of events 18 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
6.8%
7/103 • Number of events 8 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
7.2%
22/307 • Number of events 22 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
4.9%
5/103 • Number of events 6 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
6.9%
7/102 • Number of events 7 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
2.9%
9/307 • Number of events 9 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
5.8%
6/103 • Number of events 7 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
3.9%
4/102 • Number of events 6 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
14.7%
45/307 • Number of events 55 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
18.4%
19/103 • Number of events 21 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
4.9%
5/102 • Number of events 5 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
6.8%
21/307 • Number of events 25 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
7.8%
8/103 • Number of events 9 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
4.9%
5/102 • Number of events 6 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
18.2%
56/307 • Number of events 98 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
20.4%
21/103 • Number of events 35 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
8.8%
9/102 • Number of events 13 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
8.1%
25/307 • Number of events 36 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
3.9%
4/103 • Number of events 4 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.0%
2/102 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Eructation
|
3.6%
11/307 • Number of events 13 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
7.8%
8/103 • Number of events 9 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.8%
21/307 • Number of events 34 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Number of events 3 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
4.9%
5/102 • Number of events 5 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.2%
22/307 • Number of events 42 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
7.8%
8/103 • Number of events 11 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
3.9%
4/102 • Number of events 4 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.9%
9/307 • Number of events 10 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.9%
3/103 • Number of events 3 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
7.8%
8/102 • Number of events 9 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
29.0%
89/307 • Number of events 206 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
28.2%
29/103 • Number of events 57 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
11.8%
12/102 • Number of events 18 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Sensitive skin
|
5.9%
18/307 • Number of events 24 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
1.9%
2/103 • Number of events 2 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
0.00%
0/102 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
5.5%
17/307 • Number of events 21 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
8.7%
9/103 • Number of events 9 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
4.9%
5/102 • Number of events 5 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
16.6%
51/307 • Number of events 78 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
13.6%
14/103 • Number of events 39 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 4 • From week 0 to week 81
Safety analysis set included all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of randomised IMP. All presented AEs are treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event which occured during the in-trial period.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER