Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Feasibility Study Evaluating the Performance of Focused Multipolar Stimulation and Sound Coding in Adults. (NCT NCT05641155)
NCT ID: NCT05641155
Last Updated: 2026-07-29
Results Overview
Difference between the maximum comfortable loudness level C-Level for MAP A and MAP B. This is the maximum current level that provides loud but comfortable sound level for the cochlear implant user.
COMPLETED
NA
18 participants
10 weeks
2026-07-29
Participant Flow
All participants evaluated the experimental FMS programs (MAP A and MAP B).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Adult Cochlear Implant Users
Adult cochlear implant users who evaluated the test programs (MAP A and MAP B)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Adult Cochlear Implant Users
n=18 Participants
Adult cochlear implant users who evaluated the test programs (MAP A and MAP B)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksDifference between the maximum comfortable loudness level C-Level for MAP A and MAP B. This is the maximum current level that provides loud but comfortable sound level for the cochlear implant user.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear Implant Users
n=18 Participants
Adult cochlear implant users using MAP A and MAP B
|
|---|---|
|
Difference Between the Maximum C-Level for MAP A and MAP B
MAP A
|
224.0 Current Units (CU)
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
|
Difference Between the Maximum C-Level for MAP A and MAP B
MAP B
|
229.3 Current Units (CU)
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
|
Difference Between the Maximum C-Level for MAP A and MAP B
Mean Difference (MAP B-MAP A)
|
5.3 Current Units (CU)
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksMean difference between MAP A and MAP B for Quick Spectral Modulation Detection (QSMD) test. Higher scores indicate better spectral resolution and generally better ability to distinguish acoustic spectral patterns important for speech understanding. It measures the minimum modulation depth that can be perceived to enable discrimination of a spectrally modulated noise from a flat spectrum noise with the same bandwidth and overall intensity level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear Implant Users
n=18 Participants
Adult cochlear implant users using MAP A and MAP B
|
|---|---|
|
Difference in Spectral Resolution (QSMD) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
MAP A
|
82.8 percentage correct
Standard Deviation 16.7
|
|
Difference in Spectral Resolution (QSMD) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
Map B
|
83.7 percentage correct
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
|
Difference in Spectral Resolution (QSMD) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
Mean Difference (MAP B-MAP A)
|
0.88 percentage correct
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksMean difference between MAP A and MAP B for the phoneme discrimination test, Language independent test (LIT). The LIT test measures how well a person can hear the difference between speech sounds by asking them to identify which sound is different from the others.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cochlear Implant Users
n=18 Participants
Adult cochlear implant users using MAP A and MAP B
|
|---|---|
|
Difference in Language Independent Test (LIT) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
MAP B
|
71.2 percentage correct
Standard Deviation 16.0
|
|
Difference in Language Independent Test (LIT) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
Mean Difference (MAP B-MAP A)
|
1.3 percentage correct
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
|
Difference in Language Independent Test (LIT) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
MAP A
|
69.9 percentage correct
Standard Deviation 15.6
|
Adverse Events
Adult Cochlear Implant Users
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Adult Cochlear Implant Users
n=18 participants at risk
Adult cochlear implant users who evaluated the test programs (MAP A and MAP B)
|
|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
DIZZINESS
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
CARDIOMYOPATHY
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Adult Cochlear Implant Users
n=18 participants at risk
Adult cochlear implant users who evaluated the test programs (MAP A and MAP B)
|
|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchitis
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Common cold
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Dizziness
|
16.7%
3/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sore ear
|
33.3%
6/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Falls
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Head cold
|
11.1%
2/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
22.2%
4/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Imbalance
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Light headedness
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
General disorders
Loudness discomfort
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
11.1%
2/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
General disorders
Swelling at surgical site
|
16.7%
3/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Worsened tinnitus
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pressure/fullness
|
16.7%
3/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye injury/visual disturbance
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Non-auditory Stimulation
|
11.1%
2/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Post-surgical complication (CI surgery)
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
General disorders
Accidental injury
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sexually transmitted infection
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
5.6%
1/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
16.7%
3/18 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 14 months
Adverse events are reported for the overall study cohort rather than by intervention group. Separate adverse event data by for MAP A and MAP B were not prospectively collected, as both MAPs were applied within the same cohort and safety monitoring was conducted at the participant level rather than per MAP used. Consequently, adverse events are presented in a combined manner to accurately reflect the available safety data.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is the sponsor can review results communications before public release and can prohibit communications about trial results for 12 months post study completion (i.e after last subject visit).
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER