MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

NCT05615038 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 338

Last updated 2025-04-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion.

Conditions

  • Basilar Artery Occlusion
  • Endovascular Treatment

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Contact aspiration Thrombectomy

Contant aspiration is an approach that utilizes the advantages of large-bore aspiration catheters that can be easily tracked and introduced into the cerebral circulation to directly remove the thrombus via negative pressure aspiration.

PROCEDURE

Stent retriever thrombectomy

Stent retriever thrombetomy is an approach that utilize sself-expandable stent for thrombectomy. The stent retriever is expanded to capture the thrombus, which immediately may restore blood flow.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-11-07
Primary Completion
2025-02-21
Completion
2025-06-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05615038 on ClinicalTrials.gov