Prospective Comparison of the Four Biopsy Methods for Prostate Cancer Detection

NCT05589558 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 102

Last updated 2022-10-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate by the 4 biopsy methods: TRUS-guided, cognitive, fusion and transperineal template mapping biopsy.

It is recommended to combine MRI-guided biopsy with systematic (TRUS-guided or transperineal template mapping biopsy) biopsy for high yield of prostate cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which biopsy combination is more precise for prostate cancer detection.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

consequently performed 4 biopsy methods (TRUS-guided biopsy, cognitive, fusion and transperineal template mapping biopsy)

TRUS-guided biopsy - extensive number of biopsies taken transrectally involving peripheral and transitional zones (8-12 cores); cognitive biopsy - targeted biopsy with MRI information and TRUS guidance but without fusion technology (2-4 cores); fusion biopsy - targeted biopsy with MRI information using MRI/TRUS fusion technology (2-4 core); transperineal template mapping biopsy - systematic transperineal TRUS-guided biopsy with special template use to aid accurate placement of biopsy needles (more than 20 cores).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-10-01
Primary Completion
2022-02-25
Completion
2022-02-25

Countries

  • Russia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05589558 on ClinicalTrials.gov