MedTrace Logo

Urine Retention Rate Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery

NCT05571202 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1400

Last updated 2023-01-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Anorectal surgery includes pilonidal sinus, hemorrhoidectomy, anal fissure, and anal fistula operations. General and spinal anesthesia were common anesthetic methods in anorectal surgery. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that general anesthesia was superior than spinal anesthesia with respect to urine retention rate, pain score, recovery time, and side effects.

Conditions

  • Anorectal Disorder

Interventions

PROCEDURE

General anesthesia plus local infiltration

The eligible patients underwent anorectal surgery under general anesthesia (GE, GM, IVG) plus locally injected analgesics.

PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia

The eligible patients underwent anorectal surgery under spinal anesthesia alone.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Chun-Yu Lin, M.D. · Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-01
Primary Completion
2022-05-30
Completion
2022-09-30

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05571202 on ClinicalTrials.gov