Comparative Study Between Pulsed and Continuous Itraconazole for the Treatment of Onychomycosis

NCT05567484 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2022-10-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The term onychomycosis is used for a chronic fungal infection of the nail which when caused by dermatophytes, becomes tinea unguium. It not only includes the dermatophytes but also saprophytic molds infections and yeasts. Thorough literature research has revealed that 90% toenail and 75% fingernail onychomycosis are a result of dermatophytes arguably by Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum. Comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease and immunosuppression due to HIV plays a catalytic role in its prognosis. In a study, upon comparison of placebo with continuous terbinafine 250 mg daily for 24 weeks and continuous terbinafine 250 mg daily for 16 weeks, no significant differences were observed by the researchers between the two methods i.e continuous and pulse regimens of terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole respectively. Moreover, in one another research study, the researchers also did not find significant superiority of continuous itraconazole 200 mg daily for 12 weeks over pulsed itraconazole 400 mg in the treatment of terms onychomycosis of mycological cure that is the reason why continuous daily itraconazole 200 mg for 24 weeks has so far performed best in rank probabilities over other therapies, but its clinical significance is still debated. The purpose of carrying out this study was to carry out comparison between pulsed and continuous itraconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis as previous literature shows ambiguous results, therefore, this study will cement the rare evidence pertaining to the efficacy of pulsed and continuous itraconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis in our local population

Conditions

  • Onychomychosis

Interventions

DRUG

Itraconazole

100 mg two capsules of itraconazole were given twice daily to 30 patient group A for one week per month.baseline LFTs were also monitered

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-01
Primary Completion
2021-12-31
Completion
2021-12-31

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05567484 on ClinicalTrials.gov