High Voltage VS Standard Voltage Radiofrequency in a Patient With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT05563636 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2025-01-01
Summary
Postoperative lumbar spine pain syndrome (FBSS) refers to patients who have undergone surgery for lumbar spine disease one or more times and still have intractable lumbosacral pain after surgery, with or without lower limb sensory and motor dysfunction. Pain is the main reason for reducing patients' quality of life. Hussain and Erdek believe that despite up to 3 months of postoperative intervention, pain may still exist. Since persistent pain seriously affects patients' daily life and work, optimizing the FBSS treatment plan and improving the quality of life of FBSS patients cannot be ignored. At present, the treatment methods for neuropathic pain radiated to the lower extremity after lumbar spine surgery mainly include oral drug therapy, nerve block, pulsed radio frequency (PRF) and spinal cord electrical stimulation, and other minimally invasive interventional methods. Still, there is no domestic or foreign treatment method is reported in the literature to be effective.
Conditions
- Neuralgia
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
standard pulsed radio frequency (PRF)
patients will be given standard pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment: temperature 42 ℃, frequency 2 Hz, pulse width 20 ms, voltage 37-41 V, time 120 s.
- DEVICE
-
high-voltage long-term pulsed radio frequency (PRF)
patients will be given standard pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment: temperature 42 ℃, frequency 2 Hz, pulse width 20 ms, voltage 50-90 V, At the beginning, the patient will feel a severe burning sensation in the original pain area, and slowly after the patient tolerates it. Increase the voltage and gradually increase to the maximum voltage that the patient can tolerate (up to 70-90 V) until the end of 900 s.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Amani H Abdel-wahab, MD · Assiut University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-12-01
- Completion
- 2024-12-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effectiveness of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy Guided S1 Injections and Radiofrequency
NCT05247892 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Surgical Injection Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT05630404 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Drug Spread in Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spina Plane Block With Fluoroscopy
NCT05114200 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Erector Spinae Block Versus Local Field Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05570565 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Using Rac'z Catheter Versus Navi Catheter in Management of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT05018377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Block Versus Caudal in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05351203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Three Different Anagesic Techniques In Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fixation Surgery
NCT06801574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Facet Joint Injections
NCT06325631 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Caudal Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block in Lumbar Surgery
NCT06398600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Mastectomy Surgery
NCT05518292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer.
NCT05574283 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block for Post Hepatectomy Pain
NCT07337330 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
NCT06571188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus or Cervical Erector Spinae Block for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT05577559 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Pectoral Nerve Block II
NCT06188156 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block For Postoperative Pain ReliefFollowing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
NCT06655298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Volumes Spread of Erector Spinae Block in Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome Management
NCT05192278 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Interscalene and ıntertuberculary Pulsed Radiofrequency for Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT07112300 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block Regarding Analgesia Post Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT06947330 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Laparotomies
NCT04965194 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Timing of Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Block Application for Acute Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery
NCT05363540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Breast Surgery
NCT03660020 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Modified Thoracoabdominal Block for Analgesia in Obese Patients
NCT06841783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Anelgesic Effect of Rhomboid Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT05452369 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Central Sensitization in Radicular Pain in Patients With Failed Low Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT06508918 ·Status: COMPLETED