MedTrace Logo

Outflow Facility AIT vs Microshunt

NCT05548959 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 68

Last updated 2022-09-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study was to asses differences in nycthemeral (24-h) intraocular pressure (IOP) profiles and outflow facilities between patients who have undergone epibulbar microshunt implantation and ab interno trabeculectomy, respectively.

Conditions

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pneumatonometry after microshunt implantation

Pneumatonometry was perfomed over 24 hours at 5 point in time (5 AM, 11 AM, 4 PM, 8 PM, and midnight) using a Pneumatonometer. The measurement was conducted in the habitual position.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pneumatonometry after ab interno trabeculectomy

Pneumatonometry was perfomed over 24 hours at 5 point in time (5 AM, 11 AM, 4 PM, 8 PM, and midnight) using a Pneumatonometer. The measurement was conducted in the habitual position.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Wuerzburg University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-01
Primary Completion
2022-07-01
Completion
2022-07-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05548959 on ClinicalTrials.gov