Idea Density in Exam Performance

NCT05526365 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 204

Last updated 2023-10-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Text can be written in multiple ways to mean the same thing; changing how a text is written can make it easier or harder to understand. How many concepts or ideas there are in a text, divided by the total number of words, is one possible way to determine how easy or hard it is to understand. This ratio is called idea density (ID).

Varying ID has been shown to affect the speed at which a reader understands; it impacts certain people more than others, such as second language speakers. This effect may be of particular importance in an exam, where understanding a question in a limited time is key. In the UK, pharmacy students must undertake an exam set by the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) to be registered as pharmacists. The exam involves pharmaceutical calculations and shows variable pass rates. This study aims to evaluate the impact of reducing ID in a pharmaceutical calculation test and will be conducted in 14 schools of pharmacy in the UK. All participants will take a GPhC style test. Then, participants will be divided into two groups of equal size; one group will undertake a second test with the same ID as the first, while the second group will undertake a test with a lower ID. Finally, the investigators will compare the second test scores between the two groups as cohorts and question by question, evaluating whether lowering ID has increased students' scores.

If and effect is seen, ensuring that questions are written with a controlled ID may help ensure we are examining more fairly and allowing students with the requisite knowledge to pass.

Conditions

  • Medical Education
  • Health Education
  • Educational Assessment

Interventions

OTHER

Reduced Idea Density

Question idea density reduced (ratio of propositions to total words used).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Central Lancashire

    collaborator OTHER
  • Aston University

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Birmingham

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Bradford

    collaborator OTHER
  • De Montfort University

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Greenwich

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Huddersfield

    collaborator OTHER
  • Kingston University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Newcastle University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Queen's University, Belfast

    collaborator OTHER
  • Robert Gordon University

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Ulster

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Wolverhampton

    collaborator OTHER
  • Liverpool John Moores University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-10-03
Primary Completion
2022-11-06
Completion
2022-12-06

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05526365 on ClinicalTrials.gov