Enamel Matrix Derivative for Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT05517798 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2022-08-26
Summary
The Global Burden of Disease Study of 2016 considered oral disease as the most common noncommunicable disease that affected half of the world population throughout their lifetime. Dental caries and periodontal diseases may cause pain and discomfort with severe forms of periodontal diseases causing tooth loss. Periodontal disease and tooth loss were estimated to be one of the ten causes of Years Lived with Disability. The dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge following tooth loss have been extensively investigated in the literature. At six months after tooth loss, a systematic review on bone remodelling showed horizontal and vertical bone loss of 29-63% and 11-22%, respectively. Such bone loss may complicate replacement of missing teeth with dental implants.
Dental implant is now a common treatment modality. However, the loss of bone volume may not allow the placement of dental implant in an optimal position and may subsequently jeopardize functional and aesthetic implant outcomes. Therefore, the use of bone replacement graft following tooth extraction, as part of a procedure termed alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), has increasingly becoming a common treatment protocol to optimize dental implant placement in the future.
A Cochrane review on ARP has demonstrated that there are no significant differences between the plethora of synthetic or biologically driven grafting materials used to minimize changes in width and height of the extraction sockets. Nevertheless, a regenerative agent, known as enamel matrix derivative (EMD), has gained more attention in regenerative therapy over the last 20 years. Several studies demonstrated its ability to enhance wound healing, induce new attachment and promote bone formation in recession and intrabony defects. Over the last two decades, EMD has been successfully used in the periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects. EMD has the potential to cause early vascularization and support early bone formation, hence, it can be considered as a potential regenerative agent for ARP when used with appropriate carrier material.
Moreover, the majority of studies showed that bone substitutes generally performed well in small or contained defects compared with non-grafted sites, but there is lack of information regarding the efficacy of different bone substitute materials in large defects. Short-term follow-up studies of three to six months have also dominated the literature when the main aim of the ARP is to develop a site that optimise long-term implant outcomes. Such aim requires evaluating the long-term performance of dental implants placed in preserved ridges and reporting patient outcomes in well-conducted randomized controlled trial.
The aim of the present clinical trial is to evaluate the adjunctive use of EMD in promoting the desired vascularization and bone fill in small and large defects following tooth extraction and report on the long-term implant and patient outcomes.
Conditions
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Alveolar ridge preservation
Alveolar ridge preservation is a method of decreasing bone resorption following tooth extraction and facilitating prosthetically-driven implant placement
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-09-01
- Completion
- 2024-09-01
Countries
- United Arab Emirates
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Post Extraction Changes After Ridge Preservation Using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Vs Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft
NCT06318650 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Collagen Sponge Versus Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation of Periodontally Compromised Teeth
NCT05188196 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Site Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT05258019 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Demineralized and Mineralized Dentin Grafts in Ridge Preservation
NCT07242313 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05347017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft for Ridge Preservation With and Without Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT05437172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Alveolar Ridge Preservation Technique on the Need of Performing Guided Bone Regeneration for Dental Implant Placement
NCT04299750 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Demineralized Whole-tooth vs Demineralized Particulate Dentin Grafts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05336149 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Changes After Immediate Implant Placement or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone
NCT03690973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to FDBA
NCT05311735 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Layer Seeded on Platelet-rich Fibrin on an Alveolar Socket After Extraction
NCT05465421 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Preservation After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar
NCT06716736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Straumann Bone Ceramic and Bio-Oss With Guided Tissue Regeneration for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT00900718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Post-extraction Alveolar Ridge Healing/Preservation as a Stand-alone or Adjunct to Particulate Graft
NCT02707536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A 14 Weeks Longitudinal Study to Investigate the Effect of Leukocyte- Platelet Rich Fibrin Plug on the Quality of the Newly Formed Bone in Ridge Preservation Procedure Following a Tooth Extraction. It is a Clinical, Radiographic and Histomorphometric Study.
NCT03487718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Histological Comparison of Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized FDBA Alone Versus a Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
NCT01924390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT01794806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bovine-derived Xenograft With or Without L-PRF for Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06172114 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Sticky Bone and Bio-Oss Collagen in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05902689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft From Extracted Tooth Combined With Simvastatin 1:1 Versus Autogenous Tooth Graft
NCT06879171 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Tooth Extraction Using Bovine Xenograft With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane
NCT05791123 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adjunctive Use of Polynucleotide and Hyaluronic Acid-based Gel in Alveolar Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT06633211 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Behavior in Maxillary Post-extractive Sites Treated With Guided Bone Regeneration (G.B.R.) Techniques in Alveolar Socket Preservation (A.S.P.) Procedures With Different Autologous and Heterologous Biomaterials.
NCT07269990 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1