Trial Outcomes & Findings for PE Audit and Feedback Pilot Study (NCT NCT05509803)
NCT ID: NCT05509803
Last Updated: 2026-03-27
Results Overview
Linear mixed effects models with random effects for school and grade were used to determine within group difference in change between baseline and follow up in scheduled minutes of physical education/week
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
Change from baseline (spring of year 1) to follow-up (spring of year 2)
2026-03-27
Participant Flow
This two-year (2022/23-2023/24) cluster-randomized controlled trial involved 10 elementary schools conducted in partnership with the district's teacher on special assignment for physical education (hereafter, "Physical Education Director"). Study schools were chosen using a survey of school principals which identified schools that were noncompliant (or unsure about compliance) with California law mandating 200 min of physical education every 10 school days.
Schools were randomized to intervention (n = 5) and control (n = 5) arms using block randomization, ensuring equal representation by total enrollment and proportion of low-income students enrolled across groups. School PE teachers and other teachers who taught PE, along with the school principal at each school were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews about PE at their school.
Unit of analysis: Schools
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention - Physical Education Audits, Feedback, and Coaching (PEAFC)
5 elementary schools were randomized to receive the intervention, which was adapted from a prior version using: 1) findings from another school district; 2) data collected through semistructured interviews with 20 principals from non-study schools on potential best-practices for the tool; and 3) in collaboration with the district's Physical Education Director. It consisted of five yes/no indicators of physical education quantity and quality indicators: 1) Schedule all students for physical education that meets California time requirements of the equivalent of 100 min physical education/week; 2) Hire credentialed physical education teachers and assign them with appropriate student-to-staff ratios; 3) Encourage and support teachers in participating in professional development learning opportunities; 4) Observe instruction to ensure physical education content standards and grade-level outcomes; 5) Educate school community, including teachers and parents, about physical activity and other wellness opportunities. The Physical Education Director was trained to implement PEAFC in the summer prior to Year 1 and collected audit data during Fall of Year 1 through visits to each intervention school. During these visits, he spoke with principals, physical education teachers, and classroom teachers, as well as observed physical education classes, to determine which of, and to what extent, the five audit indicators were being met.
|
Control - PE as Usual
5 elementary schools were randomized to the control condition, in which they received PE-related support as usual.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16 5
|
19 5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16 5
|
19 5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
PE Audit and Feedback Pilot Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention - Physical Education Audits, Feedback, and Coaching (PEAFC)
n=5 Schools
5 elementary schools were randomized to receive the intervention, which was adapted from a prior version using: 1) findings from another school district; 2) data collected through semistructured interviews with 20 principals from non-study schools on potential best-practices for the tool; and 3) in collaboration with the district's Physical Education Director. It consisted of five yes/no indicators of physical education quantity and quality indicators: 1) Schedule all students for physical education that meets California time requirements of the equivalent of 100 min physical education/week; 2) Hire credentialed physical education teachers and assign them with appropriate student-to-staff ratios; 3) Encourage and support teachers in participating in professional development learning opportunities; 4) Observe instruction to ensure physical education content standards and grade-level outcomes; 5) Educate school community, including teachers and parents, about physical activity and other wellness opportunities. The Physical Education Director was trained to implement PEAFC in the summer prior to Year 1 and collected audit data during Fall of Year 1 through visits to each intervention school. During these visits, he spoke with principals, physical education teachers, and classroom teachers, as well as observed physical education classes, to determine which of, and to what extent, the five audit indicators were being met.
|
Control - PE as Usual
n=5 Schools
5 elementary schools were randomized to the control condition, in which they received PE-related support as usual.
|
Total
n=10 Schools
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
16 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=123 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline (spring of year 1) to follow-up (spring of year 2)Population: 5 schools were randomized to intervention and 5 were randomized to control condition. Data collection on PE schedules took place within each school. Data were aggregated at the school level.
Linear mixed effects models with random effects for school and grade were used to determine within group difference in change between baseline and follow up in scheduled minutes of physical education/week
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PE Audit and Feedback Intervention
n=5 schools
Schools in this arm will receive a PE audit and feedback tool delivered by the school district's teacher on special assignment for PE, which will consist of an audit of the school's existing PE program; Feedback on ways to improve the PE program; and technical assistance to help improve the PE program.
|
PE Support as Usual
n=5 schools
Schools in this arm will receive district-level support for PE as is typically provided by the school district.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scheduled Minutes of Physical Education/Week
|
-4.0 scheduled minutes of PE per week
Standard Error 6.5
|
2.3 scheduled minutes of PE per week
Standard Error 1.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline (spring of year 1) to follow-up (spring of year 2)Population: 5 schools were randomized to intervention and 5 were randomized to control condition. Data collection on PE schedules took place within each school and PE classes were randomly observed to ensure they were happening according to schedule. Data were aggregated at the school level.
Linear mixed effects models with random effects for school and grade were used to determine within group difference in change between baseline and follow up in estimated minutes of physical education/week based on data collected with the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PE Audit and Feedback Intervention
n=5 Schools
Schools in this arm will receive a PE audit and feedback tool delivered by the school district's teacher on special assignment for PE, which will consist of an audit of the school's existing PE program; Feedback on ways to improve the PE program; and technical assistance to help improve the PE program.
|
PE Support as Usual
n=5 Schools
Schools in this arm will receive district-level support for PE as is typically provided by the school district.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Estimated Minutes of Physical Education/Week
|
-1.3 Minutes of physical education/week
Standard Error 6.0
|
-8.0 Minutes of physical education/week
Standard Error 7.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline (spring of year 1) to follow-up (spring of year 2)Population: 5 schools were randomized to intervention and 5 were randomized to control condition. Data collection on PE schedules took place within each school and PE classes were randomly observed. Data were aggregated at the school level.
Linear mixed effects models with random effects for school and grade were used to determine within group difference in change between baseline and follow up in proportion of PE class time in MVPA based on data collected with the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PE Audit and Feedback Intervention
n=5 Schools
Schools in this arm will receive a PE audit and feedback tool delivered by the school district's teacher on special assignment for PE, which will consist of an audit of the school's existing PE program; Feedback on ways to improve the PE program; and technical assistance to help improve the PE program.
|
PE Support as Usual
n=5 Schools
Schools in this arm will receive district-level support for PE as is typically provided by the school district.
|
|---|---|---|
|
% of PE Lesson Time in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity
|
9.8 % minutes
Standard Error 3.9
|
8.5 % minutes
Standard Error 3.0
|
Adverse Events
PE Audit and Feedback Intervention
PE Support as Usual
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place