Rhomboid Intercostal Block Combined With Sub-Serratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block

NCT05506761 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75

Last updated 2022-08-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to assess the quality of analgesic efficacy and improvement of pulmonary function in patients with fracture ribs receiving either continuous rhomboid intercostal block combined with sub-serratus block or continuous erector spinae plane block by comparing and evaluating the differences between the two techniques.

Conditions

  • Rib Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block

Patients will receive 20 ml plain bupivacaine 0.25 % bolus, then 10 ml per hour plain bupivacaine 0.125 % continuous infusion via ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block

PROCEDURE

ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block combined with sub-serratus plane block

Patients will receive 20 ml plain bupivacaine 0.25 % bolus, then 10 ml per hour plain bupivacaine 0.125 % continuous infusion via ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block combined with sub-serratus plane block

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tanta University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-01-01
Primary Completion
2023-01-01
Completion
2023-01-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05506761 on ClinicalTrials.gov