The Impact of Single-shot Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Femoral Nerve Block on Rehabilitation After Total Knee Replacement

NCT05487053 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 220

Last updated 2026-04-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Total knee replacement (TKR) is considered the most effective and safe method of radical treatment of late stages of knee osteoarthritis. A well-known problem of TKR is a severe postoperative pain syndrome, which is observed in more than 50% of patients.

Femoral nerve block (FNB) is the "gold standard" for continuous postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement, as it is effective in reducing the frequency of use of opioid analgetics and reduce the duration of hospitalization. At the same time, the negative effect of this method is the motor blockade of the quadriceps femoris muscle which leads to functional impairment and is associated with an increased risk of falling.

Adductor canal block (ACB) provides adequate analgesia comparable to femoral nerve block. Moreover, ACB doesn't affect the motor function of the quadriceps femoris muscle.

The possibility of enhanced recovery after total knee replacement is the reason to compare single-shot adductor canal block and continuous femoral nerve block.

Conditions

  • Osteo Arthritis Knee
  • Gonarthrosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Single-shot adductor canal block

Postoperative analgesia in this group will be carried out by a single-shot bolus of 20 ml Ropivacaine 0.5% in the region of the middle third of the adductor canal.

PROCEDURE

Continuous femoral nerve block

Postoperative analgesia in this group will be carried out by continuous infusion of local anesthetics through a catheter installed to the femoral nerve in the area of the femoral triangle. Ropivacaine 0.2% solution will be used for postoperative analgesia. Local anesthetic infusion rate is 4 ml/h to 10 ml/h.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Valery Likhvantsev · Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-02-03
Primary Completion
2027-12-01
Completion
2028-07-01

Countries

  • Russia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05487053 on ClinicalTrials.gov