Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Validation Study for CPM Device (NCT NCT05445206)
NCT ID: NCT05445206
Last Updated: 2024-06-12
Results Overview
Accuracy of CPM System calculated RR versus reference device reported as percentage of respiration rate error within +/- breath rates per minute. Acceptance for clinical utility is \>= 85%. Percentage of respiration rate error within ± 2bpm. Acceptance criteria for clinical utility is \>= 85%. The percentage of respiration rate within ± 2brpm was calculated by data points, regardless of its rate and breathing condition, which the CPM System did not screen, therefore reporting the numeric values. Each data point will produce binary result (True or False) if the error is within ± 2 brpm. Assuming this binary result follows a binominal distribution, its confidence interval is also calculated.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
up to 3 hours
2024-06-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Health Adult
The target population is healthy adult volunteers who do not have preexisting heart or lung conditions or illness. The goal is to recruit a participant population with a range of body types and BMIs and an approximately even split of genders.
CardioPulmonary Management Device (CPM): CPM device is used in tangent with reference capnography device.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Validation Study for CPM Device
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Health Adult
n=40 Participants
The target population is healthy adult volunteers who do not have preexisting heart or lung conditions or illness. The goal is to recruit a participant population with a range of body types and BMIs and an approximately even split of genders.
CardioPulmonary Management Device (CPM): CPM device is used in tangent with reference capnography device.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
39 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
36 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
26.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Height
|
171.4 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
78.2 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9 • n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 hoursAccuracy of CPM System calculated RR versus reference device reported as percentage of respiration rate error within +/- breath rates per minute. Acceptance for clinical utility is \>= 85%. Percentage of respiration rate error within ± 2bpm. Acceptance criteria for clinical utility is \>= 85%. The percentage of respiration rate within ± 2brpm was calculated by data points, regardless of its rate and breathing condition, which the CPM System did not screen, therefore reporting the numeric values. Each data point will produce binary result (True or False) if the error is within ± 2 brpm. Assuming this binary result follows a binominal distribution, its confidence interval is also calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supine Position Measurements
n=716 device measurements
This arm includes measurements taken in position 1 of a CPM system device reading (supine position).
|
Upright Position Measurements
n=716 device measurements
This arm includes measurements taken in position 2 of a CPM system device reading (upright position).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of CPM System Calculated RR Versus Reference Device Via Percent of Error Accuracy of Respiration Rate
|
96.3 Percent
Interval 94.5 to 97.6
|
95.7 Percent
Interval 93.8 to 97.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 hoursRoot mean square (RMS) of residual relative error of relative tidal volume. Acceptance criteria for clinical utility is \<= 35%. First, the subject-specific linear fitting is performed after taking the natural log of both CPM's rTV and reference TV. Then, the residual errors in rTV after the fitting were calculated. Finally, all subject's residual errors are pooled together to calculate the root mean squared (RMS) residual relative errors. The confidence interval was calculated assuming the square of this error follows Chi-square distribution. This error characterized in a log-log domain is converted back to characterize a relative accuracy by taking an exponential of natural constant followed by subtraction of one. The RMS of residual error in % is characterized in this way because the linear fitting in the log-log domain and its residual errors represents faithful relative residual error regardless of an absolute value of TV.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supine Position Measurements
n=716 device measurements
This arm includes measurements taken in position 1 of a CPM system device reading (supine position).
|
Upright Position Measurements
n=716 device measurements
This arm includes measurements taken in position 2 of a CPM system device reading (upright position).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of Respiration Rates From the CPM System vs Reference Device for Metronome Guided Breathing and Non-metronome Guided Breathing.
|
23.6 Percent RMS residual relative error
Interval 22.2 to 25.3
|
32.6 Percent RMS residual relative error
Interval 30.4 to 35.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 hoursAccuracy of CPM System calculated RR versus reference device. It is reported in Root Mean Squared error for both exercises with metronome guided breathing and non-metronome guided breathing. Acceptance criteria of substantial equivalence is \~1.6 breath rates per minute (BRPM) for metronome guided breathing and 3.0 BRPM for non-metronome guided breathing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supine Position Measurements
n=570 relative tidal volume data points
This arm includes measurements taken in position 1 of a CPM system device reading (supine position).
|
Upright Position Measurements
n=546 relative tidal volume data points
This arm includes measurements taken in position 2 of a CPM system device reading (upright position).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of CPM System Calculated Respiration Rate Versus Reference Device, Reported as Root Mean Squared (RMS) Error
Root Mean Squared Error - Metronome Guided breathing
|
1.09 BRPM
|
1.29 BRPM
|
|
Accuracy of CPM System Calculated Respiration Rate Versus Reference Device, Reported as Root Mean Squared (RMS) Error
Root Mean Squared Error - Non-Metronome Guided breathing
|
0.91 BRPM
|
1.91 BRPM
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 hoursPopulation: Subject's ECG strips that did not pass the quality check were not included in the analysis, leading to a different number of participants than for the respiration parameters.
Test the CPM System ECG strip against a lead II ECG strip. Results are displayed as % of CPM strips equivalent to Lead II ECG strips. One CPM ECG strip and one reference lead II strip were analyzed per patient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supine Position Measurements
n=58 strips analyzed
This arm includes measurements taken in position 1 of a CPM system device reading (supine position).
|
Upright Position Measurements
This arm includes measurements taken in position 2 of a CPM system device reading (upright position).
|
|---|---|---|
|
CPM's ECG Metrics Compared to Reference Device Lead II ECG Metrics (Results Displayed as % Comparasion)
Quality QRS presentation
|
100 Percent
|
—
|
|
CPM's ECG Metrics Compared to Reference Device Lead II ECG Metrics (Results Displayed as % Comparasion)
QRS width measurability
|
100 Percent
|
—
|
|
CPM's ECG Metrics Compared to Reference Device Lead II ECG Metrics (Results Displayed as % Comparasion)
Accurate Determination of QRS widening
|
94.9 Percent
|
—
|
|
CPM's ECG Metrics Compared to Reference Device Lead II ECG Metrics (Results Displayed as % Comparasion)
QT interval measurability
|
100 Percent
|
—
|
|
CPM's ECG Metrics Compared to Reference Device Lead II ECG Metrics (Results Displayed as % Comparasion)
A-Fib Rhythm readability
|
100 Percent
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 hoursThe accuracy is characterized as mean error across all measurement items and all subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Supine Position Measurements
n=40 Participants
This arm includes measurements taken in position 1 of a CPM system device reading (supine position).
|
Upright Position Measurements
This arm includes measurements taken in position 2 of a CPM system device reading (upright position).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Test Device Skin Temperature vs Reference Device Skin Temperature Comparison
|
0.02 degrees Celcius
Standard Error .81
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Health Adult
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place