HM vs Fibreglass Cast Immbolization for Supracondylar Fractures
NCT05430074 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 79
Last updated 2024-10-17
Summary
Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children and cast immobilization continues to remain as the recommended treatment for modified Gartland's classification Type I and Type IIa injuries. Apart from plaster of Paris and fibreglass casts, the use of waterproof, tubular hybrid mesh (HM) casts have been gaining traction for cast immobilization. Although the use of HM cast has been reported to have similar clinical outcomes and overall patient satisfaction scores to the fibreglass cast, the results of the recent studies are only limited and generalizable only to paediatric distal radius fractures.
As the application method of HM and fibreglass casts are fundamentally different, it has not been reported if the difference in application duration between the cast materials is significant and its potential implications in outpatient clinic operation.
Hence, through a randomized controlled trial, this study primarily aims to investigate if the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and duration of cast application with the HM casts would be comparable with fibreglass casts in children with supracondylar humeral fractures.
Through this study, the investigators hope to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the respective casting material which may better aid physicians in deciding a more appropriate cast material for treating paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures with cast immobilization and the implications of casting duration on clinic operations.
Conditions
- Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fracture
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
HM Cast
Subjects assigned to this arm will be treated via cast immobilisation with the use of HM casts.
- DEVICE
-
Fibreglass Cast
Subjects assigned to this arm will be treated via cast immobilisation with the use of Fibreglass casts.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 0 Years
- Max Age
- 10 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-16
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-28
- Completion
- 2022-11-28
Countries
- Singapore
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Treatment of Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Children and Adolescents
NCT04531085 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Type II Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Management and Outcomes: A Prospective Multi-centre Cohort Study
NCT02963233 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Short and Long-arm Fiberglass Cast Immobilization for Distal Salter Harris I and II Forearm Fractures in Children
NCT05156749 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures With Novel Kirschner Wire Fixation Devices
NCT04122781 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
KT Tape for Pediatric Clavicle Fractures
NCT04161534 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Type II Supracondylar Fractures in Children
NCT00207870 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
ORIF Versus CRIF of Completely Displaced and Rotated Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
NCT04640727 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Splinting Versus Casting for Type I Supracondylar Fractures
NCT01912365 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Kirschner Wires Fixation Versus Cannulated Screws Internal Fixation for Displaced Lateral Condyle Humeral Fracture in Children
NCT05409053 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Forearm and Upper Arm Combi Cast for Distal Forearm Fractures in Children
NCT03297047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Internal Fixation of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures With Absorbable Screws in Children
NCT02733666 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Humeral Fracture
NCT04780308 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral vs. Crossed K-wires
NCT00358787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-Arm vs Sugar-Tong
NCT03724773 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cross Pin Configurations in Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Treatment: 2 Pins Versus 3 Pins
NCT04582123 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Results of "Four Not Techniques" in Delayed and Nonunion Fractures of Lateral Humeral Condyle in Children
NCT03545230 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Casting Versus Flexible Intramedullary Nailing in Displaced Pediatric Forearm Shaft Fractures
NCT04664517 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biobased Polyester Versus Synthetic Fiberglass Casts for Treating Stable Upper Limb Fractures in Children
NCT06102603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cast or Operation for Medial Epicondyle Fracture Treatment in Children
NCT05131672 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Displaced Medial Epicondyle Fractures In Children
NCT06454929 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Control Trial: Elbow Extension Versus Flexion Cast in Proximal Half Both Bone Forearm Fractures
NCT05470257 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Femur Fracture: Functional Bracing vs. Hip Spica Cast
NCT03948139 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Elastic Nailing With Pollar K-wire in Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Fracture of Distal Radius in Pediatric Patients
NCT07162142 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immobilization Without Reduction vs. Reduction Under General Anesthesia in Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Radius
NCT05008029 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Cast Versus Splint in Children With Acceptably Angulated Wrist Fractures
NCT00610220 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4